journal article·2018-09-28Open access

End of aging as a probe of finite-size effects near the spin-glass transition temperature

Gregory G. Kenning, Daniel M. Tennant, Christina M. Rost, Fagner Garrote da Silva, Brian J. Walters, Qiang Zhai, David C. Harrison, E. Dan Dahlberg, Raymond L. Orbach

Physical Review B· Volume 98· Issue 10

Abstract

We have measured the growth of the spin glass correlation length through the aging effect. Measurements were made on bulk ${\mathrm{Cu}}0.95{\mathrm{Mn}}0.05$ and a ${\mathrm{Cu}}0.88{\mathrm{Mn}}0.12$ thin film multilayer with CuMn layer thicknesses of 4.5 nm separated by 60-nm Cu layers. As the glass temperature ${T}g$ is approached ($0.9{T}g0.96{T}g$, there is no waiting time effect on the magnetization decay. In the temperature region $0.96{T}g\text{--}1.00{T}g$, all decays collapse onto a single decay curve indicating an end of aging even for long waiting times (${t}w=10\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}000s$). For the thin film, all effects due to the waiting time disappear at around $0.89{T}f$, where ${T}f$ is the freezing temperature marking the onset of irreversibility. These results are interpreted in terms of the spin glass correlation length saturating at a constant value after reaching a characteristic length scale, either the size of the crystallites in the bulk, or the thickness of the 4.5-nm film.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Material Dynamics and Properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.422010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4220 ↗
2. 10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/01710.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 ↗
3. 10.1016/0038-1098(85)90033-X10.1016/0038-1098(85)90033-X ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.259610.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2596 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.239310.1103/PhysRevB.42.2393 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.05430410.1103/PhysRevB.95.054304 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.36205510.1063/1.362055 ↗
8. 10.1016/0921-4526(94)90484-710.1016/0921-4526(94)90484-7 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.507310.1103/PhysRevB.44.5073 ↗
10. 10.12693/APhysPolA.88.103810.12693/APhysPolA.88.1038 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.178010.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1780 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.86910.1103/PhysRevB.40.869 ↗
13. 10.1051/jp1:199421310.1051/jp1:1994213 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.161510.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1615 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.01443410.1103/PhysRevB.91.014434 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.05440810.1103/PhysRevB.96.054408 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.12640110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.126401 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.43810.1103/PhysRevLett.82.438 ↗
19. J. Clarke · 200410.1002/3527603646 ↗
20. Daniel Tennant · Ph.D. Thesis · 2017
21. 10.1063/1.33866110.1063/1.338661 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.01442410.1103/PhysRevB.81.014424 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.05430210.1103/PhysRevB.88.054302 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.05720110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.057201 ↗
25. 10.1088/0305-4470/26/15/00110.1088/0305-4470/26/15/001 ↗
26. 10.1209/0295-5075/27/6/01310.1209/0295-5075/27/6/013 ↗