Influence of the sputtering flow regime on the structural properties and magnetic behavior of Fe-Ga thin films (Ga ∼ 30 at.%)
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper we analyze the structure of Fe-Ga layers with a Ga content of \ensuremath{\sim}30 at.% deposited by the sputtering technique under two different regimes. We also studied the correlation between the structure and magnetic behavior of the samples. Keeping the Ar pressure fixed, we modified the flow regime from ballistic to diffusive by increasing the distance between the target and the substrate. X-ray diffraction measurements have shown a lower structural quality when growing in the diffusive flow. We investigated the impact of the growth regime by means of x-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements and obtained signs of its influence on the local atomic order. Full multiple scattering and finite difference calculations based on XAFS measurements point to a more relevant presence of a disordered $A2$ phase and of orthorhombic Ga clusters on the Fe-Ga alloy deposited under a diffusive regime; however, in the ballistic sample, a higher presence of $D{0}3/B2$ phases is evidenced. Structural characteristics, from local to long range, seem to determine the magnetic behavior of the layers. Whereas a clear in-plane magnetic anisotropy is observed in the film deposited under ballistic flow, the diffusive sample is magnetically isotropic. Therefore, our experimental results provide evidence of a correlation between flow regime and structural properties and its impact on the magnetic behavior of a rather unexplored compositional region of Fe-Ga compounds.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/20.90875210.1109/20.908752 ↗
2. 10.1109/20.95127210.1109/20.951272 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.02720210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027202 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.14720210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.147202 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.12720110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.127201 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.18040510.1103/PhysRevB.82.180405 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00791-010.1016/S0925-8388(02)00791-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.01110.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.08010.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.080 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.274947110.1063/1.2749471 ↗
11. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/20/01510.1088/0953-8984/18/20/015 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.199682910.1063/1.1996829 ↗
13. 10.1109/TMAG.2006.87966610.1109/TMAG.2006.879666 ↗
14. 10.1109/TMAG.2002.80246810.1109/TMAG.2002.802468 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/05501310.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.08.02210.1016/j.jmmm.2007.08.022 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.17441110.1103/PhysRevB.91.174411 ↗
18. 10.1002/ppap.20130020110.1002/ppap.201300201 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.57239610.1116/1.572396 ↗
20. 10.1116/1.57817110.1116/1.578171 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.34302210.1063/1.343022 ↗
22. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.756510.1103/PhysRevB.58.7565 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.12512010.1103/PhysRevB.63.125120 ↗
25. R. W. G. Wyckoff · 1963
26. 10.1088/1742-6596/190/1/01203410.1088/1742-6596/190/1/012034 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00030-210.1016/S0169-4332(02)00030-2 ↗
28. Donald H. Buckley · 1981
29. 10.1016/j.intermet.2006.05.00710.1016/j.intermet.2006.05.007 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.18440610.1103/PhysRevB.77.184406 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.180910.1103/PhysRevB.56.1809 ↗
32. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/35/35500410.1088/0022-3727/47/35/355004 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.02441110.1103/PhysRevB.89.024411 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.22441110.1103/PhysRevB.92.224411 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.474812210.1063/1.4748122 ↗
36. 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00163-410.1140/epjb/e2008-00163-4 ↗
37. 10.1143/JPSJ.28.25410.1143/JPSJ.28.254 ↗
38. 10.1109/20.48978210.1109/20.489782 ↗
39. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/2/02502710.1088/0964-1726/17/2/025027 ↗