journal article·2020-11-23

Effective-medium theory for multilayer metamaterials: Role of near-field corrections

Tong Liu, Shaojie Ma, Bowen Yang, Shiyi Xiao, Lei Zhou

Physical Review B· Volume 102· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Although many effective-medium theories have been proposed for studying metamaterials, most of them do not work well for multilayer metamaterials with small interlayer distances. Based on rigorous mode-expansion analyses on a model system consisting of multiple layers of subwavelength gratings, we identify that the failures of conventional effective-medium theories are caused by neglecting strong near-field couplings in homogenizing such systems. These understandings motive us to propose an alternative homogenization approach for strongly coupled multilayer metamaterials, in which predominant near-field corrections have been considered automatically. Our effective-medium theory can well describe multilayer metamaterials with arbitrary interlayer distances including particularly those systems for which conventional effective-medium theories fail. We finally extend our theory to multilayer metamaterials with complicated microstructures and validate the theory by full-wave simulations as well as microwave experiments. Our theory not only well complements the available effective-medium theory formalisms, but also provides a powerful tool to study the properties of strongly coupled metamaterials, which may find many applications in practice.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Microwave Engineering and Waveguides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.477310.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4773 ↗
2. 10.1109/22.79800210.1109/22.798002 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.418410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.15410.1038/nphoton.2011.154 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.105884710.1126/science.1058847 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.396610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.110875910.1126/science.1108759 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.20740210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.207402 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16510710.1103/PhysRevB.83.165107 ↗
10. 10.1364/OE.19.00940110.1364/OE.19.009401 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.06390810.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063908 ↗
12. 10.1002/adom.20150070510.1002/adom.201500705 ↗
13. 10.1515/nanoph-2016-012110.1515/nanoph-2016-0121 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.19510410.1103/PhysRevB.65.195104 ↗
15. 10.1209/0295-5075/102/1800310.1209/0295-5075/102/18003 ↗
16. 10.1364/JOSAB.23.00039110.1364/JOSAB.23.000391 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.09390310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.093903 ↗
18. P. Sheng · 1995
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.07390510.1103/PhysRevLett.97.073905 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.08511110.1103/PhysRevB.74.085111 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.06660410.1103/PhysRevE.79.066604 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.20390310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203903 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl500174610.1021/nl5001746 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa45110.1088/1361-6463/aaa451 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.scib.2019.05.02810.1016/j.scib.2019.05.028 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.photonics.2007.10.00310.1016/j.photonics.2007.10.003 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.03512610.1103/PhysRevB.77.035126 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.197401 ↗
29. 10.1038/nature0977610.1038/nature09776 ↗
30. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.12410.1038/nphoton.2012.124 ↗
31. 10.1088/1464-4258/7/2/01310.1088/1464-4258/7/2/013 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.22740110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227401 ↗
33. 10.1364/OE.21.02721910.1364/OE.21.027219 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.04530510.1103/PhysRevB.93.045305 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.17420110.1103/PhysRevB.91.174201 ↗