journal article·2020-01-21

Quantitative electronic stopping power from localized basis set

Ivan Maliyov, Jean-Paul Crocombette, Fabien Bruneval

Physical Review B· Volume 101· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The electronic stopping power of a swift ion in matter can be obtained from ab initio calculations within time-dependent density functional theory. Most implementations rely today on a plane-wave plus pseudopotential approach, but at the expense of very cumbersome calculations. We show here that localized orbitals, especially with Gaussian-type orbitals, are a valuable alternative. These calculations can yield electronic stopping powers in quantitative agreement with the plane-wave results while maintaining a computational burden that is relatively low. These positive results are possible only when using Gaussian basis sets that were specially designed for the stopping power calculations. With this tool, we investigate the discrepancy between ab initio calculations and experiment at large velocity, the effect of the exchange-correlation functional, and the role of core excitations in the total stopping power. We rule out the widespread centroid path approximation as soon as the core electrons are involved in the process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.07810.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.078 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.00610.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0539510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05395 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.00710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.007 ↗
6. J. Lindhard · Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. · 1953 · 27 · 1
7. 10.1063/1.32675010.1063/1.326750 ↗
8. 10.1016/0038-1098(81)91173-X10.1016/0038-1098(81)91173-X ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.98710.1103/PhysRevA.40.987 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.102410.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1024 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.6.101310.1103/PhysRevA.6.1013 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssb.222161011010.1002/pssb.2221610110 ↗
13. 10.1016/0168-583X(92)95734-910.1016/0168-583X(92)95734-9 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.99710.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.06410.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.064 ↗
16. 10.1147/rd.521.013710.1147/rd.521.0137 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.01430610.1103/PhysRevB.91.014306 ↗
18. 10.1002/pssb.20064206710.1002/pssb.200642067 ↗
19. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.23550110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.235501 ↗
21. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.01910.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.019 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.11513410.1103/PhysRevB.96.115134 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.11640110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.116401 ↗
25. 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90289-y10.1140/epjb/e2018-90289-y ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.05.02710.1016/j.chemphys.2004.05.027 ↗
27. A. Szabó · 1996
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.03512810.1103/PhysRevB.93.035128 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.11510710.1103/PhysRevB.94.115107 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.8b1214810.1021/jacs.8b12148 ↗
31. I. Maliyov · Ph.D. thesis · 2019
32. 10.1063/1.45615310.1063/1.456153 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.46256910.1063/1.462569 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.46430310.1063/1.464303 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.06640110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.066401 ↗
36. 10.1002/jcc.2380210.1002/jcc.23802 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00214-015-1770-z10.1007/s00214-015-1770-z ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.09110.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
39. 10.1093/jicru/os25.2.7610.1093/jicru/os25.2.76 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.04110810.1103/PhysRevB.94.041108 ↗
41. 10.1557/mrs.2013.17810.1557/mrs.2013.178 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.47852210.1063/1.478522 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.03512010.1103/PhysRevB.89.035120 ↗