Predicting impurity spectral functions using machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The Anderson Impurity Model (AIM) is a canonical model of quantum many-body physics. Here we investigate whether machine learning models, both neural networks (NN) and kernel ridge regression (KRR), can accurately predict the AIM spectral function in all of its regimes, from empty orbital, to mixed valence, to Kondo. To tackle this question, we construct two large spectral databases containing approximately 410 000 and 600 000 spectral functions of the single-channel impurity problem. We show that the NN models can accurately predict the AIM spectral function in all of its regimes, with pointwise mean absolute errors down to 0.003 in normalized units. We find that the trained NN models outperform models based on KRR and enjoy a speedup on the order of ${10}5$ over traditional AIM solvers. The required size of the training set of our model can be significantly reduced using farthest point sampling in the AIM parameter space, which is important for generalizing our method to more complicated multichannel impurity problems of relevance to predicting the properties of real materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Basic Energy Sciences · Brookhaven National Laboratory
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1710.1103/RevModPhys.78.17 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.45710.1103/RevModPhys.87.457 ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/39/00510.1088/0953-8984/9/39/005 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.119119510.1126/science.1191195 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598-018-29909-210.1038/s41598-018-29909-2 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.02319010.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023190 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:100869842218310.1023/A:1008698422183 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.32410.1103/PhysRevLett.62.324 ↗
9. 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1310.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aat597510.1126/science.aat5975 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0031-8914(34)80310-210.1016/S0031-8914(34)80310-2 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.05680210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.056802 ↗
13. 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.110.1103/RevModPhys.59.1 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.281.5376.54010.1126/science.281.5376.540 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature1020410.1038/nature10204 ↗
16. 10.1038/nphys304810.1038/nphys3048 ↗
17. 10.1088/0022-3719/3/12/00810.1088/0022-3719/3/12/008 ↗
18. 10.1143/PTP.32.3710.1143/PTP.32.37 ↗
19. 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.34910.1103/RevModPhys.83.349 ↗
20. 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.77910.1103/RevModPhys.86.779 ↗
21. 10.1103/RevModPhys.47.77310.1103/RevModPhys.47.773 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.286310.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.15513610.1103/PhysRevB.90.155136 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
25. 10.1038/nphys403710.1038/nphys4037 ↗
26. J. Gilmer · 2017
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.39510.1103/RevModPhys.80.395 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.19680110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.196801 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.07640210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.076402 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.13640110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.136401 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.23640210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.236402 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRev.124.4110.1103/PhysRev.124.41 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.24110510.1103/PhysRevB.101.241105 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.24512310.1103/PhysRevB.100.245123 ↗
35. F. Pedregosa · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
36. Y. You · 2018
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/10/37/02110.1088/0953-8984/10/37/021 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.304810.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3048 ↗
39. 10.1038/3437310.1038/34373 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.41610.1103/PhysRevLett.40.416 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0190710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907 ↗
42. 10.1214/ss/117701063810.1214/ss/1177010638 ↗
43. M. Mohri · 2018
44. T. Hastie · 200910.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
45. N. Srivastava · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2014 · 15 · 1929
46. 10.1002/qua.2495410.1002/qua.24954 ↗