journal article·2025-02-28

Fluorescent Calcium Nanocluster-Driven Theranostic Nanoplatforms for Advanced Imaging and Therapy in Breast Tumor

Abhishesh Kumar Mehata, Vivek Kumar Verma, Virendra Singh, Aseem Setia, Vikas, Matte Kasi Viswanadh, Shivesh Sabbarwal, Manoj Kumar, Biplob Koch, Madaswamy S. Muthu

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Biocompatible CaCO 3 nanoclusters were prepared by using a simple biomineralization technique. Employing CaCO 3 nanoclusters in breast cancer treatment provides an exciting avenue for theranostics, which merges precise imaging with individualized treatment plans. They were highly suitable for improving the efficacy and precision of breast cancer detection and therapy with minimal adverse effects due to their biocompatibility, controlled drug release, pH sensitivity, and adaptability. In our current study, we proposed a palbociclib (PBB)-loaded fluorescent calcium nanocluster-based redox-sensitive drug delivery system for efficient breast cancer imaging and therapy. The developed nanoparticles were analyzed for their morphology and various physicochemical properties. The particle sizes of the formulated FNC-PBB-CS-NPs (nonredox-sensitive) and FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs (redox-sensitive) nanoparticles were 150.2 ± 2.1 and 160.4 ± 1.4 nm, respectively. The zeta potential of nonredox-sensitive nanoparticles was measured to be +17.12 ± 1.34 mV, while the zeta potential of redox-sensitive nanoparticles was +14.32 ± 1.17 mV. The entrapment efficiencies of FNC-PBB-CS-NPs and FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs were determined to be 88.74 ± 2.34 and 89.26 ± 1.21%, respectively. FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs demonstrated quicker drug release at acidic pH compared to FNC-PBB-CS-NPs. The cytotoxicity assay conducted on MCF-7 and T-47D cells indicated that FNC-PBB-CS-NPs and FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs exhibited greater cytotoxicities than free PBB. Furthermore, the Hoechst/PI dual-staining experiment demonstrated the superior activity of FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs over FNC-PBB-CS-NPs and free PBB. Ultrasound/photoacoustic imaging revealed that FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs effectively reduced tumor size, hypoxic tumor regions, and tumor vascularity compared to FNC-PBB-CS-NPs and free PBB. Additionally, in vivo optical imaging showed that the FNC-PBB-CS-SS-NPs accumulated more specifically in tumors than the other formulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology

Indian Institute of Technology (BHU)

Nano & Micro System Fabrication and Design Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology

IIT (BHU)

Genotoxicology and Cancer Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, Institute of Science

Banaras Hindu University

Department of Pharmaceutics, KL College of Pharmacy

Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation

Funding

Banaras Hindu University · Ministry of Education, India

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2159010.3322/caac.21590 ↗
2. 10.1259/bjr.2021103310.1259/bjr.20211033 ↗
3. 10.1387/ijdb.113396se10.1387/ijdb.113396se ↗
4. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.00510.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.005 ↗
5. 10.1097/PAP.000000000000023210.1097/PAP.0000000000000232 ↗
6. 10.7762/cnr.2015.4.1.110.7762/cnr.2015.4.1.1 ↗
7. 10.1039/D0TB00881H10.1039/D0TB00881H ↗
8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-118510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1185 ↗
9. 10.1242/dev.09174410.1242/dev.091744 ↗
10. 10.1038/nbt0415-32310.1038/nbt0415-323 ↗
11. 10.7150/ntno.9436410.7150/ntno.94364 ↗
12. 10.1039/D4TB01362J10.1039/D4TB01362J ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carres.2021.10836810.1016/j.carres.2021.108368 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.008 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0144610.1021/acsanm.3c01446 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.036 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.09.04510.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.09.045 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.a.3641010.1002/jbm.a.36410 ↗
19. 10.7150/ntno.9498710.7150/ntno.94987 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0150210.1021/acsanm.2c01502 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11988210.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119882 ↗
22. 10.3109/10408363.2015.113625910.3109/10408363.2015.1136259 ↗
23. 10.1002/cbic.20190055010.1002/cbic.201900550 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12065210.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120652 ↗
25. 10.7150/thno.869810.7150/thno.8698 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.04510.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.045 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.12388110.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123881 ↗
28. 10.1080/14712598.2018.145290610.1080/14712598.2018.1452906 ↗
29. 10.1177/0967391121105615410.1177/09673911211056154 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11728610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117286 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-020-63767-110.1038/s41598-020-63767-1 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.09610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.096 ↗
33. 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.318910.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3189 ↗
34. 10.1039/D1MA00410G10.1039/D1MA00410G ↗
35. 10.1007/s12035-015-9235-x10.1007/s12035-015-9235-x ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b0015510.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00155 ↗
37. 10.33899/ijvs.2020.16581210.33899/ijvs.2020.165812 ↗
38. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.59897710.3389/fbioe.2020.598977 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.00510.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.005 ↗
40. 10.2147/IJN.S11363810.2147/IJN.S113638 ↗
41. 10.2147/IJN.S20977310.2147/IJN.S209773 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10904-020-01791-410.1007/s10904-020-01791-4 ↗
43. 10.3791/6068210.3791/60682 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0595910.1021/acsanm.3c05959 ↗
45. 10.1371/journal.pone.015353210.1371/journal.pone.0153532 ↗
46. 10.1002/jbt.2314610.1002/jbt.23146 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0252110.1021/acsanm.0c02521 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.02.01210.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.02.012 ↗
49. 10.1177/1533033821103630410.1177/15330338211036304 ↗
50. 10.1259/bjr.2017084310.1259/bjr.20170843 ↗
51. 10.1111/joim.1201910.1111/joim.12019 ↗
52. 10.1038/nrc.2017.5110.1038/nrc.2017.51 ↗
53. 10.1002/adfm.20180184010.1002/adfm.201801840 ↗