journal article·2023-02-10

Nanocarriers Based on NaTmF4:0.5%Er3+@NaLuF4 Upconversion Nanoparticles with Enhanced Near-Infrared Luminescence for Combination Tumor Treatment

Yue Wu, Na Liu, Xiao-Xia Ren, Wen-Chao Zhang, Jing Qian

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Combination therapy could significantly improve the therapeutic effect of tumors. However, due to the lack of reasonable integration of different treatment modes, it is difficult to maximize the effect of combination treatment. To solve this problem, by adjusting the dosage of NH 4 F/NaOH, we developed NaTmF 4:0.5%Er 3+ @NaLuF 4 upconversion nanoparticles with strong near-infrared luminescence. On this basis, nanocarriers (USFH-CI) encapsulated with high-loading (33.35%) Fe(acac) 3, wrapped by human serum albumin, and grafted with cinnamic aldehyde (CA) and the IR780 photosensitizer were constructed. The dense extracellular matrix (ECM) in tumor tissues prevented the drug from diffusing into the tumors. Once USFH-CI nanocarriers were delivered to the tumor area, CA pH-responsively released H 2 O 2, which promoted photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) of IR780 driven by upconversion luminescence. A large number of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were generated, which led to the disintegration of the ECM and penetration into the tumors. Then, abundant Fe 3+ consumed GSH to generate ample GSSG and Fe 2+, which enhanced the sensitivity of tumor cells to oxidative stress, thus leading to the accumulation of lipid peroxide (LPO) and finally inducing ferroptosis. At the same time, substantial H 2 O 2 and Fe 2+ triggered off the Fenton-like reaction, releasing affluent free radicals. Beyond that, PTT of IR780 further promoted the Fenton-like reaction, and the generation of ROS was amplified. Free radicals generated in the process of ferroptosis destroyed heat shock protein produced by PTT, which solved the self-protection of cancer cells against heat. In situ ROS generation by the PTT/PDT of IR780 and the Fe 2+ Fenton-like reaction further promoted the accumulation of LPO and ferroptosis as well as deep penetration, which maximized the effect of combination treatment and achieved a high tumor inhibition rate (84.71%). Also, there was negligible damage to normal tissues with good tumor targeting and digestive metabolism.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry & Tianjin Key Laboratory of Structure and Performance for Functional Molecules & Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Inorganic−Organic Hybrid Functional Materials Chemistry, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin300387, P.R. China

Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology & National Clinical Research Center for Cancer & Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy & Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin300060, P.R. China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City · National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Foundation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2155110.3322/caac.21551 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0052510.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00525 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41568-022-00459-010.1038/s41568-022-00459-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.025 ↗
5. 10.1039/C6CS00415F10.1039/C6CS00415F ↗
6. 10.1038/cdd.2016.810.1038/cdd.2016.8 ↗
7. 10.1111/imr.1253310.1111/imr.12533 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.03.02510.1016/j.cclet.2019.03.025 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20200170410.1002/smll.202001704 ↗
10. 10.1186/s13045-019-0720-y10.1186/s13045-019-0720-y ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0328610.1021/acsnano.0c03286 ↗
12. 10.1042/BJ2008138610.1042/BJ20081386 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.01110.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.011 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0529210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05292 ↗
15. 10.1002/smll.20220011610.1002/smll.202200116 ↗
16. 10.7150/thno.5912110.7150/thno.59121 ↗
17. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0005210.3389/fchem.2020.00052 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0141510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01415 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.01310.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.06610.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.066 ↗
21. 10.1039/d1nr02043a10.1039/d1nr02043a ↗
22. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0183710.1021/acssensors.0c01837 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.0c2109910.1021/acsami.0c21099 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8CP03935F10.1039/C8CP03935F ↗
25. 10.1039/C5RA12852H10.1039/C5RA12852H ↗
26. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0186710.1021/acsanm.9b01867 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.9b0044510.1021/acsami.9b00445 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0526510.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05265 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0161610.1021/acsami.7b01616 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.10810.1016/j.snb.2018.05.108 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0239510.1021/acsnano.9b02395 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20151003110.1002/anie.201510031 ↗
33. 10.3322/caac.2011410.3322/caac.20114 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0406010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04060 ↗
35. 10.1002/ijc.2822610.1002/ijc.28226 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41575-020-0300-110.1038/s41575-020-0300-1 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb03669.x10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb03669.x ↗
38. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0620110.1021/acsnano.8b06201 ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20090069210.1002/smll.200900692 ↗