journal article·2026-01-09

Portable SERS Detection of Dipicolinic Acid with AgAu Nanostructures

Flavia Gontijo da Silva, Shiqi Wang, Parisa Talebi, Elisabeth Lemetti, Tiago Vinicius Alves, Matti Kuula, Hanna Hakulinen, Markku Vainio, Pedro H. C. Camargo

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has emerged as a powerful analytical tool, but translating its sensitivities from laboratory Raman microscopes to portable platforms remains a critical challenge for real-world deployment. Here we present a systematic evaluation of Au nanoparticles (Au NPs), Au@Ag core–shells (CS), and Au@AgAu nanorattles (NRs) as SERS substrates for dipicolinic acid (DPA), a key biomarker of Bacillus anthracis spores, using a benchtop portable Raman spectrometer. The nanostructures were synthesized through a stepwise route that yields a coherent series of Au, Ag-rich, and mixed AgAu surface architectures, enabling nanoparticle number-normalized performance comparisons. Benchmarking with 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) revealed that while nanorattles provided the strongest per-particle enhancements, core–shell substrates delivered the lowest detection limits, achieving reliable detection of 4-ATP at picomolar levels. Extending to DPA, both CS and NRs achieved detection down to 10 –6 M under alkaline conditions, with performance governed by pH-controlled speciation: nanorattles excelled under neutral conditions due to mixed-domain adsorption, while core–shells outperformed under alkaline conditions where the dianion binds strongly to Ag surfaces. DFT calculations of adsorption energies, binding geometries, and theoretical Raman spectra corroborated the experimental findings, showing stronger binding on Ag followed by AgAu surfaces. Importantly, the ∼10 –6 M detection limit corresponds to ∼ 10 6 –10 7 spores mL –1, directly relevant to practical screening scenarios such as enriched swabs or suspicious powders. These findings establish a proof-of-concept baseline for portable SERS detection of spore biomarkers and highlight the interplay between nanostructure architecture, analyte speciation, and excitation wavelength, offering generalizable design principles for the development of field-ready nanosensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, A.I. Virtasen aukio 1, PO Box 55, FIN-0014 Helsinki, Finland

Departamento de Físico-Química, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 147, Salvador, BA 40170-115, Brazil

Finnish Institute for Verification of the Chemical Weapons Convention (VERIFIN), Department of Chemistry

University of Helsinki

Funding

Jane ja Aatos Erkon S??ti? · Helsingin Yliopisto · Ministry of Defence, Finland

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.14429/dsj.56.191510.14429/dsj.56.1915 ↗
2. 10.1351/pac20027412228110.1351/pac200274122281 ↗
3. 10.3390/bios1305055710.3390/bios13050557 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60252-010.1016/S0065-2911(08)60252-0 ↗
5. 10.1038/183124a010.1038/183124a0 ↗
6. 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30111-110.1016/S2542-5196(19)30111-1 ↗
7. 10.1039/B415290E10.1039/B415290E ↗
8. 10.1021/ja063876010.1021/ja0638760 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6CC03521C10.1039/C6CC03521C ↗
10. 10.3390/nano1110267910.3390/nano11102679 ↗
11. 10.1039/D4SM01272K10.1039/D4SM01272K ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12435310.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124353 ↗
13. 10.1002/bio.379610.1002/bio.3796 ↗
14. 10.1002/bio.438310.1002/bio.4383 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.2c1220110.1021/acsami.2c12201 ↗
16. 10.3390/bios1303032810.3390/bios13030328 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12211310.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122113 ↗
18. 10.1002/EXP.2022007210.1002/EXP.20220072 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.06.00110.1016/j.talanta.2007.06.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.12086910.1016/j.saa.2022.120869 ↗
21. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0662610.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06626 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.aca.2024.34303410.1016/j.aca.2024.343034 ↗
23. 10.1039/c3cp55087g10.1039/c3cp55087g ↗
24. 10.1021/jp071219410.1021/jp0712194 ↗
25. 10.1039/df951110005510.1039/df9511100055 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.05710.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.057 ↗
27. 10.1039/D2DT02389J10.1039/D2DT02389J ↗
28. 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.02.01510.1016/j.theochem.2005.02.015 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
31. 10.1002/adom.20130045710.1002/adom.201300457 ↗
32. Feser, J.; Sobh, A. N. DDSCAT Convert: A Target Generation Tool. https://nanohub.org/resources/ddaconvert 10.21981/W4GM-SD35.10.21981/W4GM-SD35 ↗
33. 10.1364/JOSAA.21.00202310.1364/JOSAA.21.002023 ↗
34. 10.1086/17239610.1086/172396 ↗
35. 10.1364/OL.16.00119810.1364/OL.16.001198 ↗
36. 10.1364/JOSAA.11.00149110.1364/JOSAA.11.001491 ↗
37. Draine, B. T.; Flatau, P. J. User Guide for the Discrete Dipole Approximation Code DDSCAT 7.3 arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6497 (accessed Oct 27, 2025).
38. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.01810.1016/j.trac.2018.06.018 ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20250752510.1002/smll.202507525 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1455710.1021/acsnano.4c14557 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.21647610.1016/j.ccr.2025.216476 ↗
42. 10.1002/adom.20250137610.1002/adom.202501376 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp074902z10.1021/jp074902z ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0178310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01783 ↗
45. 10.1002/anie.20160174010.1002/anie.201601740 ↗
46. 10.1021/jp502236e10.1021/jp502236e ↗
47. 10.1021/jp052829b10.1021/jp052829b ↗
48. 10.1021/la011706p10.1021/la011706p ↗
49. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.11070410.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110704 ↗
50. 10.1038/srep3019310.1038/srep30193 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0012110.1021/acsomega.4c00121 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.12037210.1016/j.saa.2021.120372 ↗
53. 10.1039/C7AN01595J10.1039/C7AN01595J ↗
54. 10.1016/j.saa.2025.12616010.1016/j.saa.2025.126160 ↗
55. 10.1039/c2cp40558j10.1039/c2cp40558j ↗
56. Farquharson, S.; Gift, A.; Maksymiuk, P.; Inscore, F. E.; Smith, W. W. PH Dependence of Methyl Phosphonic Acid, Dipicolinic Acid, and Cyanide by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy , Proc. SPIE 5269, Chemical and Biological Point Sensors for Homeland Defense, 2004 10.1117/12.510626.10.1117/12.510626 ↗
57. 10.1002/jrs.549310.1002/jrs.5493 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0095510.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00955 ↗
59. 10.1002/cnma.20180064810.1002/cnma.201800648 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.10.09210.1016/j.snb.2018.10.092 ↗
61. 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00728-010.1016/S0009-2614(03)00728-0 ↗
62. 10.1002/jrs.419010.1002/jrs.4190 ↗
63. 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01145-210.1016/S0022-0728(02)01145-2 ↗
64. 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1274-1279.200110.1128/AEM.67.3.1274-1279.2001 ↗
65. 10.1128/jb.89.4.984-987.196510.1128/jb.89.4.984-987.1965 ↗
66. 10.1021/ac034689c10.1021/ac034689c ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b0217210.1021/acs.analchem.7b02172 ↗
68. 10.1021/acssensors.4c0315110.1021/acssensors.4c03151 ↗