journal article·2025-03-14Open access

Electrical Conduction Mechanism of Gels and Films Formed by Self-Assembled Elastin-Like Polypeptide Nanofibers: Implications for Tissue Regeneration

Rei Shibata, Md. Zahidul Islam, Rintaro Takahashi, Masato Nakaya, Jun Onoe, Ayae Sugawara-Narutaki

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrically conductive scaffolds have been developed for effective tissue regeneration. However, most of these are composites of biocompatible polymers and conductive additives, with little attention being paid to the conductivity of the biocompatible polymers. Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs), which can self-assemble to form nanofibers and hydrogels, are promising scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. In this study, we investigated the electrical conduction mechanism of nanofibers composed of GPPG, an ELP consisting of Gly-rich and Pro-rich sequences derived from elastin, and a terminal oligohistidine tag (His-tag). The aqueous dispersion of the GPPG nanofibers was weakly acidic, and its electrical conductivity was approximately three times higher than that of an aqueous acetic acid solution at the same pH. Dynamic viscoelasticity measurements and small-angle X-ray scattering suggested that the nanofibers formed a network (gel) with charged amino acids on their surfaces. Humidity-dependent current increase and hysteresis were observed in the current–voltage characteristics of the GPPG nanofiber films, whereas current was not observed under vacuum conditions. These results showed that proton conduction was dominant in the electrical conductivity of this system. Impedance spectroscopy revealed that the resistance of bulk nanofiber films decreased with increasing relative humidity. The resistance of the GPPG nanofiber film was ten times lower than that of the film of bovine serum albumin, regardless of the lower content of charged amino acids in GPPG. Wide-angle X-ray scattering of GPPG nanofiber films suggested that His-tags linked to Gly-rich sequences forming β-sheets were in close proximity to each other. Furthermore, the coordination of cobalt ions to His residues resulted in the loss of electrical conductivity of GPPG nanofibers. These results suggest that His residues are densely presented on the surface of the self-assembling network of GPPG, causing effective proton conduction at the nanofiber–water interface. ELP nanofibers with proton conductivity and biocompatibility are expected to be applied not only as scaffold materials, but also for wearable sensors and biofuel cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Connective tissue disorders research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Laboratory for Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan

Department of Macromolecular Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.coelec.2024.10155110.1016/j.coelec.2024.101551 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.12.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2020.12.005 ↗
3. 10.1002/cjce.2383610.1002/cjce.23836 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12274-020-2825-610.1007/s12274-020-2825-6 ↗
5. 10.1002/aelm.20200072110.1002/aelm.202000721 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-020-2010-910.1038/s41586-020-2010-9 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-020-15759-y10.1038/s41467-020-15759-y ↗
8. 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.01510.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.015 ↗
9. 10.1002/bip.1973.36012100810.1002/bip.1973.360121008 ↗
10. 10.1002/bip.1973.36012100910.1002/bip.1973.360121009 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0MA00951B10.1039/D0MA00951B ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20210120810.1002/adma.202101208 ↗
13. 10.1038/nchem.196010.1038/nchem.1960 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.abc081010.1126/sciadv.abc0810 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20140111110.1002/adfm.201401111 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20160462410.1002/adfm.201604624 ↗
17. 10.1039/c5nr06750b10.1039/c5nr06750b ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2011.11910.1038/nnano.2011.119 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5RA28092C10.1039/C5RA28092C ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20160111210.1002/smll.201601112 ↗
21. 10.1128/mbio.00084-1510.1128/mbio.00084-15 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.03.03410.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.03.034 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0875610.1021/acsnano.7b08756 ↗
24. 10.1021/bm301887m10.1021/bm301887m ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.a.3610510.1002/jbm.a.36105 ↗
26. 10.1093/rb/rbac11110.1093/rb/rbac111 ↗
27. 10.3390/ijms2208410410.3390/ijms22084104 ↗
28. 10.3390/ijms2024626210.3390/ijms20246262 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20190136910.1002/adfm.201901369 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c0032610.1021/acs.biomac.3c00326 ↗
31. 10.5796/electrochemistry.21-0001010.5796/electrochemistry.21-00010 ↗
32. 10.1107/S002188989901224810.1107/S0021889899012248 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6528/aadd3a10.1088/1361-6528/aadd3a ↗
34. 10.1039/c7ra06289c10.1039/c7ra06289c ↗
35. 10.1149/2.0291816jes10.1149/2.0291816jes ↗
36. 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80083-X10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80083-X ↗
37. 10.1039/C9ME00002J10.1039/C9ME00002J ↗