Nanoscale Metafoils with Enhanced Mechano-Optical Properties for Solar Radiation Isolation
Source abstract
Abstract
Thin metal films on flexible polymer substrates (foils) are used widely in satellite missions as they show extreme thermal isolation and high interface strength. Here, we show nanoscale “metafoils” with plasmon resonances, allowing interplay with visible radiation while reflecting the unwanted infrared responsible for device heating. The nanomechanical design of metafoils results in crack-free nanodomains, leading to resilient optical resonances withstanding strains up to ∼20%. We perform nanoscale electromagnetic and mechanical simulations to evaluate the metafoils’ mechano-optical behavior. Our simulations well fit the experimental positions of strain localization, resulting in material damage. The central nanodomains of metafoils remain crack-free at strains exceeding the crack offset strain of unpatterned foils by >84%. Fragmentation tests show that the crack spacing in metafoils can be tailored, in contrast to unpatterned films, by choosing appropriate structural parameters. Such small-footprint, resilient, and lightweight devices are highly desirable for heat rejection, communications, and spectroscopies in harsh environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Mechanics of Materials and Nanostructures, Thun 3602, Switzerland
Department of Materials Science, Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben 8700, Austria
Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-WaveCore), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
Funding
KU Leuven · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · European Space Agency · Eidgen?ssische Materialpr?fungs- und Forschungsanstalt
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsami.7b1294910.1021/acsami.7b12949 ↗
2. 10.1002/adhm.20180027510.1002/adhm.201800275 ↗
3. 10.1039/c9tc04246f10.1039/c9tc04246f ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0057310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573 ↗
5. 10.3389/fmats.2016.0001110.3389/fmats.2016.00011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.02.00510.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.02.005 ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-648x/abe96c10.1088/1361-648x/abe96c ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mee.2016.10.01210.1016/j.mee.2016.10.012 ↗
9. 10.1088/0954-0083/12/1/31010.1088/0954-0083/12/1/310 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.07.07910.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.07.079 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.04310.1016/j.msea.2018.08.043 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2021.13905110.1016/j.tsf.2021.139051 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0841-6_4510.1007/978-1-4613-0841-6_45 ↗
14. 10.1002/ecjb.442069091110.1002/ecjb.4420690911 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41566-019-0394-610.1038/s41566-019-0394-6 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aas976810.1126/science.aas9768 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2015.30410.1038/nnano.2015.304 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41377-022-00709-810.1038/s41377-022-00709-8 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.abk259310.1126/science.abk2593 ↗
20. 10.1039/c9nh00067d10.1039/c9nh00067d ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20180015310.1002/adom.201800153 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aaf664410.1126/science.aaf6644 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.aaa249410.1126/science.aaa2494 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.00410.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.004 ↗
25. 10.1364/oe.44657010.1364/oe.446570 ↗
26. 10.1002/pip.346310.1002/pip.3463 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.abb097110.1126/science.abb0971 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.aai789910.1126/science.aai7899 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.150945311210.1073/pnas.1509453112 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0008910.1021/acsphotonics.7b00089 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.02710.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.027 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-019-12451-810.1038/s41467-019-12451-8 ↗
33. Ashcroft N. W. · 1976
34. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.022 ↗
35. 10.1080/09500839.2013.83079210.1080/09500839.2013.830792 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.13790610.1016/j.tsf.2020.137906 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.04010.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.040 ↗
38. 10.1080/14786435.2012.72314510.1080/14786435.2012.723145 ↗
39. Revie, R. W.; Uhlig, H. H. Corrosion and Corrosion Control: An Introduction to Corrosion Science and Engineering; John Wiley & Sons, 2008, pp 215–240.10.1002/9780470277270 ↗
40. 10.1002/sia.643410.1002/sia.6434 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.03210.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.032 ↗
42. 10.1364/oe.26.01572610.1364/oe.26.015726 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.06.02010.1016/j.matlet.2009.06.020 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.36210.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.362 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.04410.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.044 ↗
46. Edward D. P. · 1985
47. Abràmoff M. D. · Biophot. Int. · 2003 · 11 · 36
48. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗