journal article·2022-12Open access

Study on numerical seismic performance evaluation of 3D building frame with smart self-centering BRBs system

Young Chan Kim, Hasan Shahriyer, Jong Wan Hu

Abstract

Structures are generally designed to withstand the applied loads safely. However, in order to secure the stability of structures from earthquakes, which are unpredictable natural disasters, seismic damage reduction technology is required, and various technologies are being developed so far. Recently, to resist seismic loads, new materials are used to reinforce structural members, or technologies to control vibration by applying seismic devices are being developed. In particular, Shape Memory Alloy (SMA), also known as a smart alloy, has a unique re-centering capacity that exhibits a flag-shaped hysteresis curve, so when applied in a structural system, it can provide safer structural performance with higher serviceability. In this study, to prove the structural stability of the SMA buckling restrained brace (BRB) system to which the seismic isolation is applied, a study was conducted to evaluate the seismic performance according to the structural material, type, and device. Response of SMA BRB and base isolation system has been calibrated by following quasi-static and dynamic loading test and substantially matches empirical results. A prototype steel frame has been designed by following standard code which has a single-story basement assumed to be surround by well graded sandy soil. In addition, two different column system has been considered namely as, Hollow Steel Section (HSS) and Concrete Filled Steel Tubes (CFST). For the nonlinear dynamic analysis, two sets of 11 bidirectional artificial earthquakes were considered, and the interstory drift ratio (IDR) and residual interstory drift ratio (RIDR) were considered as main performance evaluation parameters. In moderate ground motion, the performance of the SMA BRB was found to be higher compared to the steel BRB and base isolation system due to its superior self-centering capacity. However, in strong ground motions, periodic damage degrades the performance of the SMA BRB, which was found to be nearly identical to the steel BRB, but still superior to the base isolation system. This performance evaluation study will help to understand design aspects of seismic protection systems for similar types of building frames.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Jaiswal · 2017
2. Toward performance-based seismic design of structures10.1193/1.1586052 ↗
3. Hazus · Tech. Man., Natl. Inst. Build. Fed. Emerg. Manag. Agency, Wash. (DC) · 1997
4. Seismic reliability of steel frames, Proc., 9th IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems
5. Bollard · Econ. Impacts Seism. Risk: Lessons Wellingt., Speech Deliv. Rotary Club Wellingt. Vic. Univ. Wellingt. Organ. Eff. Seism. Risk Conf., Wellingt. · 2011
6. Damage to non-structural components and contents in 2010 Darfield earthquake
7. Performance and calculations of concrete filled steel tubes (CFST) under axial tension10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.005 ↗
8. Experimental study discussion of the seismic behavior on new types of internal/external stiffeners in rigid beam-to-CFST/HSS column connections10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.032 ↗
9. Experimental and numerical study of double-through plate connections to CFST column10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.10.024 ↗
10. Performance of the high-strength self-stressing and self-compacting concrete-filled steel tube columns subjected to the uniaxial compression10.1007/s40999-017-0257-9 ↗
11. Thin-walled CFST columns for enhancing seismic collapse performance of high-rise steel frames10.3390/app7010053 ↗
12. Axial compressive behaviour of high-strength steel spiral-confined square concrete-filled steel tubular columns10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107245 ↗
13. Prediction of axial load capacity of stub circular concrete-filled steel tube using fuzzy logic10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.011 ↗
14. Cyclic loading tests of thin-walled square steel tube beam-column joint with different joint details
15. Seismic analysis and evaluation of several recentering braced frame structures10.1177/0954406213490600 ↗
16. Seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluation of recentering buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs)10.1007/s13296-014-1201-3 ↗
17. Inelastic behavior of smart recentering buckling-restrained braced frames with superelastic shape memory alloy bracing systems10.1177/0954406212457730 ↗
18. Seismic Behavior and Recentering Capability Evaluation of Concentrically Braced Frame Structures using Superelastic Shape Alloy Active Control Bracing System10.5000/EESK.2012.16.6.001 ↗
19. Analyses and evaluations for composite-moment frames with SMA PR-CFT connections10.1007/s11071-010-9903-3 ↗
20. Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1046) ↗
21. Gjorv · 2000
22. Peak and residual responses of steel moment-resisting and braced frames under pulse-like near-fault earthquakes10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.013 ↗
23. Pilot study for investigating the inelastic response of a new axial smart damper combined with friction devices
24. Estimating optimum parameters of a new SMA damper under different earthquake ground motions
25. Enhancing the seismic performance of EBFs with vertical shear link using a new self-centering damper
26. Seismic performance evaluation of a structure retrofitted using steel slit dampers with shape memory alloy bars10.1007/s13296-017-1227-4 ↗
27. Energy-Based Seismic Design Methodology of SMABFs Using Hysteretic Energy Spectrum10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002515 ↗
28. Performance-based plastic design approach for multi-story self-centering concentrically braced frames using SMA braces
29. Performance-based seismic design of self-centering steel frames with SMA-based braces
30. Seismic design method for multi-story SMA braced frames based on inelastic displacement ratio10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106794 ↗
31. Experimental investigation of smart shear dampers with re-centering and friction devices
32. Studying the rehabilitation of existing structures using compound system of cables and shape memory alloys
33. Computational study of self‐centering buckling‐restrained braced frame seismic performance10.1002/eqe.2428 ↗
34. Numerical evaluation of SMA-based multi-ring self-centering damping devices10.1088/1361-665X/ac1d94 ↗
35. Experimental investigation on the behavior of bracing damper systems by utilizing metallic yielding and recentering material devices
36. Characterization of cyclic properties of superelastic monocrystalline Cu–Al–Be SMA wires for seismic applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.065 ↗
37. Shape memory alloy cables for structural applications10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001457 ↗
38. Superelastic NiTi SMA cables: Thermal-mechanical behavior, hysteretic modelling and seismic application10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.049 ↗
39. Seismic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy spring in base isolation system of multi-story steel frame10.3390/ma12060997 ↗
40. Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
41. Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-0 ↗
42. Behavior and application of self-centering dampers equipped with buckling-restrained SMA bars
43. Application of ancient earthquake resistant method in modern construction technology
44. Kelly · 2001
45. Cyclic compressive behavior of polyurethane rubber springs for smart dampers
46. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—overview, limits and new ideas10.1007/BF02479550 ↗
47. Buildings
48. Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete building retrofitted with self-centering shape memory alloy braces10.1007/s11803-022-2113-4 ↗
49. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010 ↗
50. Seismic response control of building structures with superelastic shape memory alloy wire dampers
51. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of a multiple building structure: evaluation of equivalent linearization method10.1155/2016/8934196 ↗
52. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175) ↗
53. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of a multiple building structure: design, construction, and assessment
54. Nonlinear dynamic response of RC buildings with different base Isolation systems subjected to horizontal and vertical components of near-fault ground motions10.2174/1874836801206010373 ↗
55. Influence of tall buildings on seismic response of shallow underground structures10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001963 ↗
56. Construction technology for tall buildings
57. DESA · U. Nations Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff. · 2018
58. Seismic performance evaluation of a tall building: Practical modeling of surrounding basement structures
59. Soil structure interaction (SSI) analysis of shear wall buildings with a below-ground parkade
60. Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1014) ↗
61. Correlation between seismic parameters of far-fault motions and damage indices of low-rise reinforced concrete frames10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.020 ↗
62. Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014 ↗
63. On seismic hazard analysis of the two vulnerable regions in Iran: deterministic and probabilistic approaches
64. On the seismic response of protected and unprotected middle-rise steel frames in far-field and near-field areas
65. The numerical study of base-isolated buildings under near-field and far-field earthquakes10.1080/13632469.2016.1269698 ↗
66. Potential for structural failure in the seismic near field
67. Assessment of near-field and far-field strong ground motion effects on soil-structure SDOF system
68. Seismic response of steel SMFs subjected to vertical components of far-and near-field earthquakes with forward directivity effects
69. Effects of pulse-like nature of forward directivity ground motions on the seismic behavior of steel moment frames
70. Effect of soil classification on seismic behavior of SMFs considering soil-structure interaction and near-field earthquakes
71. Study on the behavior characteristics of rubber friction bearing devices
72. Seismic Performance Evaluation According to HSS and CFST Columns of 3D Frame Buildings with Rubber Friction Bearing (RFB)10.3390/ma15041281 ↗
73. Response of seismically isolated steel frame buildings with sustainable lead-rubber bearing (LRB) isolator devices subjected to near-fault (NF) ground motions10.3390/su7010111 ↗
74. Seismic response and performance evaluation of self-centering LRB isolators installed on the CBF building under NF ground motions10.3390/su8020109 ↗
75. PRISM for earthquake engineering a program for seismic response analysis of SDOF system
76. An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings10.1002/eqe.2431 ↗
77. Assessment of friction of EP frictional materials used for spherical bearings of railway bridges10.7781/kjoss.2019.31.4.293 ↗
78. Standard · Struct. Bear.: elastomeric Bear. 1337-3, Br. Stand., UK · 2005
79. Seismic behavior characteristic of high damping rubber bearing through shaking table test10.21595/jve.2016.15973 ↗
80. Shaking table tests of lead inserted small-sized laminated rubber bearing for nuclear component seismic isolation10.3390/app11104431 ↗
81. Development of Small-Sized Lead Inserted Laminated Rubber Bearing for Nuclear Component Seismic Isolation10.3390/en13123193 ↗
82. Engineers · 2017
83. Construction, Manual of Steel Construction: Load & resistance factor design
84. Soil mechanics
85. Soil mechanics in engineering practice
86. Passive earth pressures: theories and tests10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(248) ↗
87. Nonlinear soil–abutment–bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707) ↗
88. Canadian foundation engineering manual
89. Oesterle · Des. Consid. Integral abutment/Jt. Bridges USA · 2014
90. OpenSees command language manual
91. Large-scale passive earth pressure load-displacement tests and numerical simulation10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000386 ↗
92. Seismic performance evaluation of recentering braced frame structures using superelastic shape memory alloys-nonlinear dynamic analysis
93. ASCE · 2005
94. Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements