journal article·2024-09-27

In Silico-Directed Design and Experimental Validation of an IL/UiO-66 Nanocomposite with Exceptional CO2 Selectivity across a Wide Pressure Range

Ozce Durak, Ahmet Safa Aydogdu, Nitasha Habib, Hasan Can Gulbalkan, Zekihan Ozerdem, Sahika Sena Bayazit, Seda Keskin, Alper Uzun

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Ionic liquid (IL)/metal–organic framework (MOF) (IL/MOF) nanocomposites have been shown to offer a broad potential in adsorption-based CO 2 separation, especially at very low pressures. Selection of the most suitable ILs is crucial for synthesizing IL/MOF nanocomposites capable of achieving exceptionally high CO 2 selectivities under more applicable conditions, such as at atmospheric pressure. However, the existence of a very wide range of IL-MOF pairs makes the design of such materials time-consuming when relying solely on experimental approaches. In this work, we employed a multitiered computational approach involving conductor-like screening model for realistic solvents, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations, and density functional theory calculations. The goal was to screen 35,476 diverse ILs from various families to identify the IL that could boost the CO 2 selectivity. Results of the computational screening highlighted 1- n -butyl-3-methylimidazolium tricyanomethanide ([BMIM][C(CN) 3 ]) as the promising IL candidate offering significant potential for separation of CO 2 from N 2 and CH 4 . We then experimentally incorporated this IL into a robust MOF, UiO-66, and characterized the resulting structure in deep detail. Testing of [BMIM][C(CN) 3 ]/UiO-66 for adsorption of CO 2, N 2, and CH 4 demonstrated that the nanocomposite provides exceptional CO 2 separation performance, offering an appreciable amount of CO 2 uptake, while almost completely rejecting N 2 and CH 4 up to 1 and 0.3 bar, respectively, at 25 °C. Our results illustrated the importance of accurate selection of the IL for the design of IL/MOF nanocomposites with high performance for target gas separations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey

Koç University TÜPRAŞ Energy Center (KUTEM), Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey

Department of Chemisty, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bogazici University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey

Institute of Nanotechnology and Biotechnology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34500 Istanbul, Turkey

Koç University Surface Science and Technology Center (KUYTAM), Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey

Funding

Ko? ?niversitesi · T?rkiye Fulbright Egitim Komisyonu · T?rkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.12390710.1016/j.molliq.2023.123907 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.enchem.2019.10001610.1016/j.enchem.2019.100016 ↗
3. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170430310.1002/adma.201704303 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20220414910.1002/adfm.202204149 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c0030910.1021/acs.cgd.0c00309 ↗
7. 10.1002/chem.20130032610.1002/chem.201300326 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11057810.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110578 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr970037a10.1021/cr970037a ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0024810.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00248 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0316910.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b03169 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12482810.1016/j.seppur.2023.124828 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11958110.1016/j.memsci.2021.119581 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0084810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00848 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11044610.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110446 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.00410.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11930310.1016/j.seppur.2021.119303 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.3c0213010.1021/acsami.3c02130 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10181110.1016/j.jcou.2021.101811 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.fluid.2011.06.03810.1016/j.fluid.2011.06.038 ↗
21. Eckert, F.; Klamt, A. COSMOtherm. Version C2, 2013.
22. 10.1016/j.jct.2016.09.00210.1016/j.jct.2016.09.002 ↗
23. 10.1039/C7NJ03269B10.1039/C7NJ03269B ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.46206610.1063/1.462066 ↗
26. 10.1002/cphc.20110052110.1002/cphc.201100521 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.44948610.1063/1.449486 ↗
28. 10.1002/jcc.54007040210.1002/jcc.540070402 ↗
29. 10.1021/j100161a07010.1021/j100161a070 ↗
30. 10.1021/j100389a01010.1021/j100389a010 ↗
31. 10.1002/aic.69047071910.1002/aic.690470719 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp972543+10.1021/jp972543+ ↗
33. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0014810.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00148 ↗
35. 10.1021/cr500551h10.1021/cr500551h ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c0024910.1021/acs.jctc.3c00249 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41597-020-00637-510.1038/s41597-020-00637-5 ↗
39. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/42/42420610.1088/0953-8984/24/42/424206 ↗
40. 10.1002/wcms.3010.1002/wcms.30 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRev.131.7910.1103/PhysRev.131.79 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.1c0015210.1021/acsami.1c00152 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0339310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03393 ↗
44. 10.1039/c3cc46105j10.1039/c3cc46105j ↗
45. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12334610.1016/j.seppur.2023.123346 ↗
46. 10.1002/admi.20210235410.1002/admi.202102354 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-648X/aba06c10.1088/1361-648X/aba06c ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15260810.1016/j.cej.2024.152608 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRev.59.69310.1103/PhysRev.59.693 ↗
50. 10.1107/s002188981003049910.1107/s0021889810030499 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11814-017-0269-910.1007/s11814-017-0269-9 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.10110.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.101 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.08110.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.081 ↗
54. 10.1080/19475411.2012.68877310.1080/19475411.2012.688773 ↗
55. 10.1002/anie.20150550810.1002/anie.201505508 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b0060410.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00604 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.00610.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.006 ↗
58. 10.4209/aaqr.2013.11.033710.4209/aaqr.2013.11.0337 ↗
59. 10.1039/C8CE01364K10.1039/C8CE01364K ↗
60. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11621910.1016/j.seppur.2019.116219 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
62. 10.1002/aoc.422110.1002/aoc.4221 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0241510.1021/acs.iecr.9b02415 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0251910.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02519 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11094710.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110947 ↗
66. Deng J. · J. Polym. Sci. · 2020 · 58 · 257510.1002/pol.20190195 ↗
67. 10.1002/adma.20180554410.1002/adma.201805544 ↗
68. 10.1039/c2cp23920e10.1039/c2cp23920e ↗
69. 10.1021/acsaenm.3c0001010.1021/acsaenm.3c00010 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12314310.1016/j.memsci.2024.123143 ↗