Systematic derivation of realistic spin models for beyond-Heisenberg solids
Source abstract
Abstract
The magnetic properties of many ultrathin films on metal substrates cannot be explained by the Heisenberg exchange interaction. Other known interactions, such as the biquadratic or the four-spin interaction, are also insufficient. This suggests the existence of further multispin interactions. The authors provide a systematic derivation of those interactions based on a multiband Hubbard model combined with a downfolding technique and propose a three-spin interaction. They show that it is strong in the systems with Fe on Ru(0001) and Fe on Rh(111), and even comparable in size to the Heisenberg interaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Peter Grünberg Institut and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich and JARA, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Funding
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. P. W. Anderson · 1963
2. H. J. Zeiger · 1973
3. C. de Graaf · 2015
4. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3110.1038/natrevmats.2017.31 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.11680110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.116801 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphys223110.1038/nphys2231 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms1361310.1038/ncomms13613 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms503010.1038/ncomms5030 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.22441310.1103/PhysRevB.84.224413 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.02040110.1103/PhysRevB.92.020401 ↗
11. 10.1088/0305-4608/15/6/01810.1088/0305-4608/15/6/018 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.29310.1103/PhysRevB.58.293 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.17440210.1103/PhysRevB.64.174402 ↗
14. M. Fähnle · 200710.1002/9780470022184.hmm122 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.01720410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.017204 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.11990110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.119901 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0132860110.1007/BF01328601 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature0580210.1038/nature05802 ↗
19. 10.1080/1478643050050404810.1080/14786430500504048 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.18441510.1103/PhysRevB.72.184415 ↗
21. In this paper the spin-orbit interaction is neglected and thus the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction or the magnetic anisotropies are not part of the discussion.
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.309010.1103/PhysRevB.14.3090 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.02720110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.027201 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.110610.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1106 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRev.120.33510.1103/PhysRev.120.335 ↗
26. 10.1016/0038-1098(72)90755-710.1016/0038-1098(72)90755-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/0304-8853(93)91197-F10.1016/0304-8853(93)91197-F ↗
28. 10.1088/0305-4470/10/3/01110.1088/0305-4470/10/3/011 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.507810.1103/PhysRevB.18.5078 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A180310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1803 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.1010.1103/PhysRevLett.11.10 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.628710.1103/PhysRevB.33.6287 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.09240610.1103/PhysRevB.74.092406 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.59389810.1063/1.593898 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.238010.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2380 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.472510.1103/PhysRevB.11.4725 ↗
37. 10.1088/0022-3719/10/8/03110.1088/0022-3719/10/8/031 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.975310.1103/PhysRevB.37.9753 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00257005015310.1007/s002570050153 ↗
40. 10.1143/JPSJ.70.308910.1143/JPSJ.70.3089 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.36167810.1063/1.361678 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.08720510.1103/PhysRevLett.108.087205 ↗
43. 10.1038/nphys204510.1038/nphys2045 ↗
44. 10.1002/pssb.20114709010.1002/pssb.201147090 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.20720210.1103/PhysRevLett.120.207202 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.20720110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.207201 ↗
47. We would like to note that the nomenclature three-spin interactions has recently drawn criticism as the interaction indicates an interaction of three spins, which would lack time-inversion symmetry. In the context of this paper we use it synonymously to four-spin-three-site interaction.
48. 10.1143/JPSJ.36.4810.1143/JPSJ.36.48 ↗
49. 10.1143/JPSJ.47.78610.1143/JPSJ.47.786 ↗
50. 10.1016/0375-9601(80)90148-610.1016/0375-9601(80)90148-6 ↗
51. 10.1143/JPSJ.24.116910.1143/JPSJ.24.1169 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.13241210.1103/PhysRevB.76.132412 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00166-210.1016/S0304-8853(97)00166-2 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.174806710.1063/1.1748067 ↗
55. R. Winkler · 200310.1007/b13586 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRev.149.49110.1103/PhysRev.149.491 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.aop.2011.06.00410.1016/j.aop.2011.06.004 ↗
58. M. Hoffmann, N. Ohs, and S. Blügel (2019), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3609778.
59. 10.1098/rspa.1963.020410.1098/rspa.1963.0204 ↗
60. 10.1098/rspa.1964.001910.1098/rspa.1964.0019 ↗
61. 10.1098/rspa.1964.019010.1098/rspa.1964.0190 ↗
62. We use ti,α,j,α′′ instead of only ti,α,j,α′ to emphasize the two different types of hoppings. This notation will also be used later on in the paper.
63. This ensures that a ferromagnetic alignment (either all spins up or all spins down) gains no energy in higher-order. This agrees well with the underlying Hubbard model where none of the hopping terms have any effect on those ferromagnetic states as no hopping is possible.
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.09441110.1103/PhysRevB.79.094411 ↗