journal article·2019-09-27

Cations Block Hydrogen-Bonding-Driven Ethanol Permeation through Disordered Drop-Cast Graphene Oxide Membranes

Richard B. Church, Kaiwen Hu, Giuliana Magnacca, Marta Cerruti

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 2· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) membranes are an ideal candidate for ethanol (EtOH) dehydration. EtOH rejection is typically obtained by controlling the GO’s structural order, sometimes in combination with large concentrations of ions, but the mechanisms responsible for EtOH rejection are poorly understood. Here we show that GO membranes drop-cast from suspensions containing a small concentration of ions are impermeable to EtOH vapor. Backed by in situ experimental evidence, acid–base titrations and calculations based on percolation theory matching the results obtained at different ionic concentrations, we propose that the ions prevent hydrogen-bonding-driven intercalation by screening the GO’s oxygen-containing groups, a more effective mechanism than the one previously based on in silico simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0E8

Department of Chemistry and NIS Interdepartmental Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy 10125

Funding

Faculty of Engineering, McGill University · Fonds de Recherche du Qu?bec - Nature et Technologies · Canada Research Chairs · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Alberta Student Aid

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4QI00230J10.1039/C4QI00230J ↗
2. 10.1126/science.124571110.1126/science.1245711 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0447510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04475 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2017.2110.1038/nnano.2017.21 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.02010.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.020 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20150097510.1002/adma.201500975 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20160609310.1002/adma.201606093 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121169410.1126/science.1211694 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat502510.1038/nmat5025 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.06210.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.062 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.00710.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.007 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4TA02359E10.1039/C4TA02359E ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-017-00990-x10.1038/s41467-017-00990-x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.07310.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.073 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170577510.1002/adma.201705775 ↗
16. 10.1038/nchem.214510.1038/nchem.2145 ↗
17. 10.1038/nature2404410.1038/nature24044 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0091410.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00914 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12274-017-1626-z10.1007/s12274-017-1626-z ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0595310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05953 ↗
21. Green D. W. · 2007
22. 10.1021/nn700349a10.1021/nn700349a ↗
23. 10.1039/C6NR03503E10.1039/C6NR03503E ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0228910.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02289 ↗
25. 10.1038/nchem.182010.1038/nchem.1820 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.07710.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.077 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep2948410.1038/srep29484 ↗
28. 10.1021/nn101844t10.1021/nn101844t ↗
29. 10.1021/nn304737810.1021/nn3047378 ↗
30. 10.1021/cm203223z10.1021/cm203223z ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat331610.1038/nmat3316 ↗
32. 10.1016/0020-0891(70)90003-510.1016/0020-0891(70)90003-5 ↗
33. 10.6028/jres.048.03610.6028/jres.048.036 ↗
34. 10.1021/nn405568210.1021/nn4055682 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn304471w10.1021/nn304471w ↗
36. 10.1039/C4CS00060A10.1039/C4CS00060A ↗
37. Swanson H. E. · National Bureau of Standards Circular 539 · 1953
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0471310.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04713 ↗
39. Christensen, K. Percolation Theory, 2002. http://web.mit.edu/ceder/publications/Percolation.pdf.
40. Seidell A. · 1940
41. Patnaik P. · 2003
42. Comey A. M. · 1921