Comparative study on the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of the one-part geopolymer stabilized soil by using different hybrid machine learning models
Source abstract
Abstract
With the development of green, low-carbon, and sustainable economic systems, the issues of high pollution and energy consumption in construction materials have become increasingly prominent. This study focuses on adopting one-part geopolymer (OPG) in soil stabilization for underground engineering, which exhibits environmental and low-carbon advantages. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) serves as a crucial parameter for assessing stabilized soil’s performance. However, it is necessary to conduct a large number of experiments, inducing high costs and time consumption. In this study, one multiple linear regression model, one Decision Tree (DT) model, five ensemble machine learning (ML) models (i.e. Random Forest [RF], Extra Tree [ET], Gradient Boosting [GB], Gradient Boosting Decision Tree [GBDT], and Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost]), and hybrid models of those single ensemble models with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) (i.e. PSO-RF, PSO-ET, PSO-GB, PSO-GBDT, and PSO-XGBoost) were adopted and compared to achieve better prediction on the UCS of the OPG-stabilized soil. Furthermore, the interpretable method including SHAP and PDP (1D and 2D), was employed to investigate the precise mechanisms by which input parameters influenced the output label. The results revealed that the multiple linear regression model delivered the lowest accuracy, and PSO-XGBoost and PSO-ET exhibited the best performance on the prediction of the UCS with R2 value of 0.9964 and 0.9928, respectively. In addition, Curing time exerted the most significant impact on the UCS, followed by FA/GGBFS, Molarity, Water/Binder, and NaOH/Precursor. Compared to the SHAP method, the PDP offered a more intuitive approach to reveal the relationship between the inputs and output. The outcome of the study shed new light on the application of ML models in the prediction of the OPG-stabilized soil’s performance in underground engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Advancing carbon nanomaterials-engineered self-sensing cement composites for structural health monitoring: a state-of-the-art review
2. Deep soft soil improvement by alkaline activation10.1680/grim.900032 ↗
3. Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.017 ↗
4. Fly ash-dominated High-Strength Engineered/Strain-Hardening Geopolymer Composites (HS-EGC/SHGC): Influence of alkalinity and environmental assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141182 ↗
5. Strain-hardening alkali-activated fly ash/slag composites with ultra-high compressive strength and ultra-high tensile ductility10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107075 ↗
6. Effect of additives on the setting time and compressive strength of activated high-calcium fly ash-based geopolymers10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135035 ↗
7. A state-of-art review on development and progress of backfill grouting materials for shield tunneling
8. One-part alkali-activated materials: A review10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001 ↗
9. Experimental comparisons between one-part and normal (two-part) alkali-activated slag binders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125177 ↗
10. Development of alkali activated cementitious material from sewage sludge ash: Two-part and one-part geopolymer10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135547 ↗
11. Strength development in soft marine clay stabilized by fly ash and calcium carbide residue based geopolymer
12. Consolidation behavior of fly ash-based geopolymer-stabilized dredged mud
13. Early strength development of soft clay stabilized by one-part ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymer
14. Effects of fly ash content on the strength development of soft clay stabilized by one-part geopolymer under curing stress10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003887 ↗
15. On the use of one-part geopolymer activated by solid sodium silicate in soft clay stabilization10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132957 ↗
16. Full-scale accelerated testing of geogrid-reinforced inverted pavements10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.01.005 ↗
17. Machine learning can predict setting behavior and strength evolution of hydrating cement systems10.1111/jace.16706 ↗
18. A comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the compressive strength of field-placed concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.042 ↗
19. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889 ↗
20. Machine learning in concrete science: applications, challenges, and best practices10.1038/s41524-022-00810-x ↗
21. Neural network, machine learning, and evolutionary approaches for concrete material characterization
22. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mixture proportions using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119208 ↗
23. Machine learning for strength evaluation of concrete structures – critical review
24. Prediction of elastic modulus of concrete using support vector committee method10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000507 ↗
25. An ensemble machine learning approach for prediction and optimization of modulus of elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118271 ↗
26. Modeling and sensitivity analysis of concrete creep with machine learning methods10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003843 ↗
27. Predicting the early-stage creep dynamics of gels from their static structure by machine learning10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116817 ↗
28. Sensitivity analysis of creep models considering correlation10.1617/s11527-015-0782-4 ↗
29. A machine learning and game theory-based approach for predicting creep behavior of recycled aggregate concrete
30. T. M. ZengIop. Prediction of impermeability of the concrete structure based on random forest and support vector machine
31. An artificial neural networks model for predicting permeability properties of nano silica–rice husk ash ternary blended concrete10.1007/s40069-013-0038-z ↗
32. Predicting the permeability of pervious concrete based on the beetle antennae search algorithm and random forest model
33. Artificial intelligence applied in the concrete durability study10.1007/978-3-030-50998-9_5 ↗
34. Machine learning for durability and service-life assessment of reinforced concrete structures: Recent advances and future directions10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.016 ↗
35. Fire-retarding asphalt pavement for urban road tunnels: a state-of-the-art review and beyond10.1007/s10694-024-01556-2 ↗
36. Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms10.3390/polym13193389 ↗
37. Application of soft computing techniques to predict the strength of geopolymer composites10.3390/polym14061074 ↗
38. Physico-mechanical and microstructural properties of waste geopolymer powder and lime-added semi-lightweight geopolymer concrete: efficient machine learning models
39. Prediction of compressive strength fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FRGC) using gene expression programming (GEP)
40. A novel framework for strength prediction of geopolymer mortar: Renovative precursor effect
41. A data-driven influential factor analysis method for fly ash–based geopolymer using optimized machine-learning algorithms10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004266 ↗
42. Effect of coconut fiber length and content on properties of high strength concrete10.3390/ma13051075 ↗
43. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
44. An engineer's guide to eXplainable Artificial Intelligence and Interpretable Machine Learning: Navigating causality, forced goodness, and the false perception of inference10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103821 ↗
45. A systematic review and assessment of concrete strength prediction models
46. Coupling machine learning with thermodynamic modelling to develop a composition-property model for alkali-activated materials
47. Prediction and uncertainty quantification of compressive strength of high-strength concrete using optimized machine learning algorithms10.1002/suco.202100732 ↗
48. Hybrid intelligence models for compressive strength prediction of MPC composites and parametric analysis with SHAP algorithm
49. Modeling the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using hybrid machine learning algorithms
50. Prediction of compressive strength of alkali-activated construction demolition waste geopolymers using ensemble machine learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129600 ↗
51. Optimization design for alkali-activated slag-fly ash geopolymer concrete based on artificial intelligence considering compressive strength, cost, and carbon emission
52. Machine learning interpretable-prediction models to evaluate the slump and strength of fly ash-based geopolymer10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.180 ↗
53. Concrete compressive strength prediction modeling utilizing deep learning long short-term memory algorithm for a sustainable environment10.1007/s11356-021-12877-y ↗
54. New prediction models for unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer stabilized soil using multi-gen genetic programming10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.043 ↗
55. Empirical approach for strength prediction of geopolymer stabilized clayey soil using support vector machines10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.012 ↗
56. A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees10.1007/s10100-017-0479-6 ↗
57. Induction of decision trees10.1007/BF00116251 ↗
58. Classification and regression trees10.2307/2530946 ↗
59. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
60. Predictive modeling of compressive strength of sustainable rice husk ash concrete: Ensemble learner optimization and comparison10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131285 ↗
61. Estimation of unconfined compressive strength of marine clay modified with recycled tiles using hybridized extreme gradient boosting method10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131992 ↗
62. Aggregation models in ensemble learning: A large-scale comparison10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.015 ↗
63. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
64. Gradient boosting for survival analysis with applications in oncology
65. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
66. Predicting the microbiologically induced concrete corrosion in sewer based on XGBoost algorithm
67. T. Chen, C. GuestrinM. Assoc Comp. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. in: 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), San Francisco, CA, 2016, pp. 785-794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
68. R. Eberhart, J. Kennedy. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, in MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995, 39-43.10.1109/MHS.1995.494215 ↗
69. Fracture performance prediction of polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced cementitious composites containing nano-SiO2 using least-squares support vector machine optimized with quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103074 ↗
70. A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
71. Kriegler · 2007 · 144
72. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00646_6.x ↗