journal article·2025-12-19Open access

Well-Defined Morphology Enables Tuning of the Antimicrobial Activity of ZnO Nanoparticles

Antonella González -Faraco, Ricardo H. Hernández-Figueroa, Aurelio López-Malo, Nelly Ramírez-Corona, Ricardo Navarro-Amador, Alexis Piñeiro-García

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 50

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) is intimately linked to their physicochemical properties, yet the specific contribution of morphology remains insufficiently understood due to current Zn 2+ leaching and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. This work investigates the key role of ZnO-NPs morphology in governing the biological performance. Spherical (ZnO-S, 60–70 nm diameter) and needle-like (ZnO-N, ∼800 nm length) nanostructures were synthesized via a Metal–Organic Framework template-approach and hydrothermal synthesis, respectively, achieving precise morphological control. SEM characterization confirmed the distinct architectures produced, while XRD and Raman spectroscopy verified a wurtzite crystalline phase with minimal oxygen vacancies, preventing Zn 2 + leaching. Antibacterial assays revealed that needle-like morphology displayed superior inhibition against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, showing an inhibition of 90% and 80%, respectively, at a ZnO concentration of 1.2 mg mL –1 . In contrast, spheric particles showed a concentration-dependent effects with a maximum inhibition of 50% under the same particle concentration. Antifungal activity of the ZnO-NPs was evaluated through the radial growth of Aspergillus niger and Penicillium citrinum using the Gompertz model. A needle-like loading of 0.055 mg cm –2 was sufficient to rapidly reduce the specific growth rate of A. niger from 0.049 h –1 to 0.013 h –1, while P. citrinum showed higher resistance irrespective of the morphology. Although both particles inhibited fungal growth, distinct morphology-driven mechanisms were observed: ZnO-S interfered with conidiation in A. niger, whereas ZnO-N rapidly suppressed colony expansion. Against P. citrinum, ZnO-N minimally altered the radial growth but strongly reduced spore production. Finally, ROS quantification revealed higher ROS generation in ZnO-S (74.8 ± 4.9 μg H 2 O 2 eq/mg NP) compared to ZnO-N (60.4 ± 4.4 μg H 2 O 2 eq/mg NP), highlighting morphology as a key determinant of antimicrobial activity. By directly linking nanoscale morphology with an antimicrobial mode of action, this study establishes morphology as a design principle for ZnO-based nanomaterials targeting specific pathogens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental

Universidad de las Américas Puebla

Departamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológico

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598-022-12134-310.1038/s41598-022-12134-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.01110.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.011 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11947-012-0797-610.1007/s11947-012-0797-6 ↗
4. 10.1155/2014/28146110.1155/2014/281461 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ipha.2024.08.00410.1016/j.ipha.2024.08.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10530710.1016/j.surfin.2024.105307 ↗
8. 10.1088/2632-959X/abc81310.1088/2632-959X/abc813 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.16790310.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167903 ↗
10. 10.3390/technologies1301001810.3390/technologies13010018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.02110.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.021 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0067310.1021/acsomega.7b00673 ↗
13. 10.1039/C4DT02557A10.1039/C4DT02557A ↗
14. 10.2147/IJN.S21620410.2147/IJN.S216204 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.05710.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.057 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.00410.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.01110.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.011 ↗
18. 10.1186/s11671-020-03418-610.1186/s11671-020-03418-6 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12668-025-01988-210.1007/s12668-025-01988-2 ↗
20. 10.1021/la104825u10.1021/la104825u ↗
21. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.01310.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.12.05610.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.12.056 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.09710.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.097 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.18910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.189 ↗
25. 10.3390/biomimetics602003410.3390/biomimetics6020034 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.11410.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.114 ↗
27. 10.5539/ijc.v11n2p11910.5539/ijc.v11n2p119 ↗
28. 10.1007/s13204-019-01127-w10.1007/s13204-019-01127-w ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.07510.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.075 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.07310.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.073 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.07.01710.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.07.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.12810710.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128107 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.6b0255310.1021/jacs.6b02553 ↗
34. 10.3390/ijerph2105056010.3390/ijerph21050560 ↗
35. 10.3390/foods1315231810.3390/foods13152318 ↗
36. 10.3390/antibiotics1112181310.3390/antibiotics11121813 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0226610.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02266 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9RA10548D10.1039/C9RA10548D ↗
39. 10.1007/s10853-021-05828-y10.1007/s10853-021-05828-y ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-020-04452-610.1007/s10853-020-04452-6 ↗
41. 10.1002/admi.20190149010.1002/admi.201901490 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0048710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00487 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10904-023-02834-210.1007/s10904-023-02834-2 ↗
44. 10.1039/C6TA07860E10.1039/C6TA07860E ↗
45. 10.1021/jp407792a10.1021/jp407792a ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0846010.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08460 ↗
47. 10.1002/bio.7019910.1002/bio.70199 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-020-77426-y10.1038/s41598-020-77426-y ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.4c1023410.1021/acsami.4c10234 ↗
50. 10.1038/s43246-025-00842-y10.1038/s43246-025-00842-y ↗
51. 10.1002/jrs.254610.1002/jrs.2546 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.14410.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.144 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0122210.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01222 ↗
54. 10.3390/cryst908039510.3390/cryst9080395 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.28010.1016/j.msec.2017.03.280 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.11054110.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110541 ↗
57. 10.1088/1674-1056/25/7/07780310.1088/1674-1056/25/7/077803 ↗
58. 10.1155/2021/861729010.1155/2021/8617290 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41598-019-48056-w10.1038/s41598-019-48056-w ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12751110.1016/j.cej.2020.127511 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0204610.1021/acsanm.4c02046 ↗
62. 10.3390/nano1407063810.3390/nano14070638 ↗
63. 10.1186/s11671-018-2532-310.1186/s11671-018-2532-3 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10876-019-01551-610.1007/s10876-019-01551-6 ↗
65. 10.1007/s12010-022-04265-010.1007/s12010-022-04265-0 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.micres.2010.03.00310.1016/j.micres.2010.03.003 ↗
67. 10.1088/1468-6996/9/3/03500410.1088/1468-6996/9/3/035004 ↗