journal article·2025-09-19

Nanoparticle-Assisted Surface Patterning of Microneedles for Mechanical Interlocking-Based Tissue Adhesion

Gyeong Won Lee, Keum-Yong Seong, Sangsoo Jang, Taejun Eom, Ki Su Kim, Yuhan Lee, Hyo-Chang Lee, Seong Il Yoo, Seung Yun Yang

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanopatterned microneedle (MN) has garnered significant attention for its potential to modulate surface characteristics, particularly in applications such as drug delivery, biosensing, and transdermal diagnostics. However, achieving precise nanopatterning on 3D polymeric surfaces of MN array while maintaining the structural and functional stability of the material remains a challenge. In this study, we describe a method for fabricating 3D nanopatterns on MN surfaces using a directionally controlled plasma etching technique. By adjusting the plasma incidence angle during etching, distinct 3D patterns, including nanogroove geometries, were successfully produced. The pattern morphology was systematically investigated through variations in parameters such as chuck bias power and incidence angle. To enable selective etching, an etch mask composed of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) encapsulated in polystyrene–poly(acrylic acid) (PS–PAA) block copolymer micelles was employed. A polyelectrolyte multilayer, formed by alternate deposition of cationic poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and anionic poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS), provided strong electrostatic anchoring for the AuNP@PS–PAA micelles. This system served as an effective etch mask, protecting the underlying polymer surface from plasma etching in the regions where the micelles were adsorbed. The resulting nanopatterns significantly modified surface topography without degrading the mechanical properties of MN. Specifically, insertion force into porcine skin remained comparable to the nonpatterned MN, indicating that the introduction of 3D nanopatterns does not impair the material’s primary mechanical function. Furthermore, nanopatterned MN exhibited a notable enhancement in adhesion, with up to a 6-fold increase compared to nonpatterned MN. This was attributed to the increased surface area and additional contact interfaces created by the patterns, facilitating stronger interactions with biological substrates. This work demonstrates that precise 3D nanopatterning via plasma etching can effectively tailor surface properties while preserving the functional integrity of polymeric biomaterials, offering broad applicability in biomedical engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomaterials Science (BK21 Four Program), Life and Industry Convergence Institute

Pusan National University

School of Chemical Engineering

Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Center for Accelerated Medical Innovation, Center for Nanomedicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Harvard Medical School

School of Electronics and Computer Engineering

Korea Aerospace University

Department of Polymer Engineering

Pukyong National University

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.02310.1016/j.addr.2003.10.023 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11228110.1016/j.bios.2020.112281 ↗
3. 10.1002/anbr.20220004010.1002/anbr.202200040 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20190919710.1002/adfm.201909197 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12117110.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121171 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12890510.1016/j.cej.2021.128905 ↗
7. 10.1155/2016/785198610.1155/2016/7851986 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41598-018-33386-y10.1038/s41598-018-33386-y ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20110098210.1002/adfm.201100982 ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.121644110910.1073/pnas.1216441109 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10973010.1016/j.matdes.2021.109730 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.01510.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.015 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/05100110.1088/1748-3190/11/5/051001 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0499410.1021/acsnano.7b04994 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.512777810.1063/1.5127778 ↗
16. 10.1186/s41205-019-0039-x10.1186/s41205-019-0039-x ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20190574010.1002/adma.201905740 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.02310.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.023 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.heares.2020.10814110.1016/j.heares.2020.108141 ↗
20. Xiong W. · 2017 · 23710.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00009-9 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0999910.1021/acsnano.0c09999 ↗
22. 10.1039/d4tc00612g10.1039/d4tc00612g ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20230181010.1002/adhm.202301810 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12200-021-1121-810.1007/s12200-021-1121-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.033 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0NR07539F10.1039/D0NR07539F ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0789610.1021/acsnano.3c07896 ↗
28. 10.1088/0960-1317/6/1/00210.1088/0960-1317/6/1/002 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00328-710.1016/S0169-4332(00)00328-7 ↗
30. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/50/50530210.1088/0957-4484/26/50/505302 ↗
31. 10.1116/1.58198610.1116/1.581986 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.327651110.1149/1.3276511 ↗
33. 10.1088/0960-1317/21/6/06503610.1088/0960-1317/21/6/065036 ↗
34. 10.1039/C5SM00824G10.1039/C5SM00824G ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.5b0540810.1021/acsami.5b05408 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00003-710.1016/S1359-0294(03)00003-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.00110.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.01610.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.016 ↗
39. 10.1002/mame.20160036110.1002/mame.201600361 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41378-024-00663-y10.1038/s41378-024-00663-y ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20240166710.1002/adma.202401667 ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.071211710510.1073/pnas.0712117105 ↗
43. 10.1038/ncomms271510.1038/ncomms2715 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.04110.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.041 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41598-023-37372-x10.1038/s41598-023-37372-x ↗