journal article·2023-10-27

Why Can Phosphorus-Doped Nanopores Improve the Capacitance of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors Using Alkaline Electrolytes? A First-Principles Study

Xu Zhang, Dongyang Hao, Shuwei Tang, Wei Dong, Ding Shen, Shaobin Yang

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate how phosphorus-doped carbon micropores can significantly enhance the capacitance of electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), we performed first-principles calculations on phosphorus-doped monolayer (MGP) and bilayer graphene (BGP- x, x = 4–8), simulating macropores or mesopores and micropores, respectively. In addition, we studied the stable structure, relative capacitance, and reaction characteristics of Na +, Li +, and their hydrated ion structures {[Na(H 2 O) n ] +, [Li(H 2 O) n ] +, n = 1–4} on MGP, as well as their insertion behavior in BGP- x . Surprisingly, we observed a desolvation phenomenon within the phosphorus-doped carbon micropores. The calculation results suggest that the adsorption of [Na(H 2 O) 4 ] + and [Li(H 2 O) 4 ] + on MGP is primarily attributed to the stronger OH–π interaction compared to the Na + –π and Li + –π interactions. On the other hand, the stability of the structure after embedding [Na(H 2 O) n ] + and [Li(H 2 O) n ] + in BGP- x can be explained by the opposite scenario. The equilibrium between these two interactions and the continuous reduction in interlayer spacing facilitate the desolvation of [Na(H 2 O) n ] + and [Li(H 2 O) n ] + . A decrease in the number of water molecules bound to Na + and Li + ions leads to a maximum increase in relative capacitance of 2.7 and 3.0 times, respectively. This indicates that desolvation can significantly enhance the capacitance of EDLCs. The complete desolvation size for Na + is less than 4 Å, while for Li +, it is 4.3 Å. Based on these calculations, when using phosphorus-doped carbon materials as electrode materials, selecting an electrolyte containing Li + rather than Na + would result in a higher capacitance. The calculation results reveal the mysterious mechanism behind the significant increase in capacitance caused by phosphorus-doped carbon micropores. In addition to this, they also provide us with a magical key to optimize the perfect combination of electrolyte composition and carbon material pore size/type.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China

Funding

Liaoning Technical University · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20230213910.1002/aenm.202302139 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-023-06326-810.1038/s41586-023-06326-8 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11581-020-03728-w10.1007/s11581-020-03728-w ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16382410.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163824 ↗
5. 10.3390/molecules2805214710.3390/molecules28052147 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12598-022-02022-010.1007/s12598-022-02022-0 ↗
7. 10.1039/D1NR03406E10.1039/D1NR03406E ↗
8. 10.1039/D1NJ03740D10.1039/D1NJ03740D ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-020-00748-810.1038/s41560-020-00748-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jobab.2022.05.00310.1016/j.jobab.2022.05.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10693410.1016/j.est.2023.106934 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10103810.1016/j.est.2019.101038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.12.01210.1016/j.jechem.2021.12.012 ↗
14. 10.1007/s40843-017-9206-410.1007/s40843-017-9206-4 ↗
15. 10.1039/C1CS15060J10.1039/C1CS15060J ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aab379810.1126/science.aab3798 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.02810.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.028 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5CP06952A10.1039/C5CP06952A ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.07310.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.073 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.04.01210.1016/j.jiec.2019.04.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10717410.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107174 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0TA06238C10.1039/D0TA06238C ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12876710.1016/j.cej.2021.128767 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12385810.1016/j.cej.2019.123858 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.113219510.1126/science.1132195 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20070386410.1002/anie.200703864 ↗
28. 10.1002/chem.20080063910.1002/chem.200800639 ↗
29. 10.1039/C9CP02922B10.1039/C9CP02922B ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15137410.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151374 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
32. 10.1088/0965-0393/13/1/R0110.1088/0965-0393/13/1/R01 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.169110.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1691 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.01510.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.015 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.12110.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.121 ↗
38. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
39. 10.1021/sc300072410.1021/sc3000724 ↗
40. 10.1039/C4CP03386H10.1039/C4CP03386H ↗
41. 10.1007/s11664-020-08371-910.1007/s11664-020-08371-9 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.05310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.053 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp201991j10.1021/jp201991j ↗
44. 10.1021/nn900286h10.1021/nn900286h ↗
45. 10.1021/jp509694h10.1021/jp509694h ↗
46. 10.1021/jp003287v10.1021/jp003287v ↗
47. 10.1021/ar300265y10.1021/ar300265y ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14379810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143798 ↗
49. 10.1039/C9TA02268F10.1039/C9TA02268F ↗
50. 10.1080/00268979617391210.1080/002689796173912 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1631710.1103/PhysRevB.54.16317 ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20200391110.1002/aenm.202003911 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.45851710.1063/1.458517 ↗
54. 10.1038/371683a010.1038/371683a0 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.physleta.2019.05.02510.1016/j.physleta.2019.05.025 ↗
56. 10.1002/wcms.7110.1002/wcms.71 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41565-020-0704-710.1038/s41565-020-0704-7 ↗
58. 10.1039/C9NA00374F10.1039/C9NA00374F ↗
59. 10.1021/nn101595y10.1021/nn101595y ↗
60. 10.1039/C5NR06456B10.1039/C5NR06456B ↗