Spraying Transparent Nanoglass Coatings for Food Packaging
Source abstract
Abstract
When coating suspensions of large aspect ratio clay monolayers upon drying, the individual nanosheets self-assemble into thin nanoglass coatings due to the large overlapping areas between restacked clay nanosheets. By exchanging the films with flat-lying, hydrophobic organocations, swelling at higher relative humidity is suppressed, and the interlayer space collapses to less than 3 Å, a value smaller than the kinetic diameter of oxygen. Consequently, diffusion along the interlayer space is impeded, resulting in very good gas barriers. The guanidinium-exchanged all-clay coating was found to have transmission rates for oxygen as low as 0.32 cm 3 μm m –2 day –1 atm –1 and for water vapor as low as 3.74 g m –2 day –1, both values determined at harsh conditions (38 °C and 90% relative humidity). The barrier is rather insensitive to swelling with water vapor, and the performance of the waterborne coatings is competitive, in both barrier performance and transparency with vapor-deposited coatings rendering them an alternative for challenging food packaging applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Flame retardant materials and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bavarian Polymer Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany
BYK-Chemie GmbH, Plant Moosburg, Stadtwaldstrasse 44, 85368 Moosburg, Germany
Funding
ALTANA Institute
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pts.62110.1002/pts.621 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12393-020-09235-y10.1007/s12393-020-09235-y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.01310.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.01810.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.018 ↗
5. 10.2478/plua-2013-001110.2478/plua-2013-0011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.01410.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.014 ↗
7. 10.1002/chem.20070035110.1002/chem.200700351 ↗
8. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0020010.3389/fmats.2020.00200 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.10139510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395 ↗
10. 10.1002/tcr.20170008510.1002/tcr.201700085 ↗
11. 10.1002/pola.1995.08033070710.1002/pola.1995.080330707 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.6b0828710.1021/acsami.6b08287 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20180247710.1002/adma.201802477 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0107710.1021/acs.iecr.8b01077 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80877-710.1016/S0376-7388(00)80877-7 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.1c1424610.1021/acsami.1c14246 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0163310.1021/acsnano.0c01633 ↗
18. 10.1039/D3NR00438D10.1039/D3NR00438D ↗
19. 10.1021/nl100322410.1021/nl1003224 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20160537810.1002/adfm.201605378 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.114317610.1126/science.1143176 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.3c0250410.1021/acsami.3c02504 ↗
23. Nam H.-J. · Clay Sci. · 2007 · 13 · 159
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.05710.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.057 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.06.00910.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.06.009 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0220610.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02206 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11998-021-00535-410.1007/s11998-021-00535-4 ↗
28. Plötze, M.; Kahr, G. Diagnostic intercalation in clay minerals - use of guanidine carbonate. In Proceedings of the 4th MECC, Mineralogia, Zakopane, Poland, 2008; Vol. 33, pp 331–332.
29. 10.1021/jp412588f10.1021/jp412588f ↗
30. 10.1021/la304453h10.1021/la304453h ↗
31. 10.1021/cm011014m10.1021/cm011014m ↗
32. 10.1002/admt.20220055310.1002/admt.202200553 ↗
33. 10.1021/nn901182910.1021/nn9011829 ↗
34. 10.1002/chem.20080165910.1002/chem.200801659 ↗
35. 10.1002/ppap.20170020910.1002/ppap.201700209 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00178-310.1016/S0376-7388(02)00178-3 ↗
37. 10.1039/D2MA00734G10.1039/D2MA00734G ↗
38. 10.1039/c2ra20457f10.1039/c2ra20457f ↗
39. 10.1143/JJAP.48.05550310.1143/JJAP.48.055503 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.00310.1016/j.cis.2010.12.003 ↗