Molecular dynamics simulations of collision cascades in niobium: comparing interatomic potentials
Source abstract
Abstract
Radiation damage in structural materials is a critical concern for advanced nuclear energy systems, and niobium is of interest due to its high melting point, mechanical strength, and corrosion resistance. In this work, large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of collision cascades in pure niobium were performed at 300 K over a primary knock-on atom (PKA) energy range of 1–75 keV using four interatomic potentials: an embedded atom method (EAM), two Finnis–Sinclair models (FS-1 and FS-2), and a machine-learning-based spectral neighbour analysis potential (SNAP) developed in our previous work. Previous studies have shown that SNAP and FS-2 correctly reproduce the stable 12⟨111⟩ self-interstitial atom (SIA) configuration, whereas EAM and FS-1 incorrectly predict the ⟨110⟩ configuration as the lowest-energy SIA state rather than the physically correct 12⟨111⟩ orientation. Building on this understanding, we examine how these differences influence radiation damage predictions. All potentials capture the general features of cascade formation, but clear differences are observed in defect production, clustering, and morphology. At low PKA energies, defect behaviour is mainly governed by the stiffness-to-range ratio (|S/R|), threshold displacement energy, and defect formation energies, while subcascade formation dominates at higher energies. EAM and FS-1 predict higher defect survival, whereas SNAP and FS-2 show similar and lower defect retention. Vacancy clustering dominates in all cases, with EAM exhibiting the highest clustering fraction. Morphological analysis reveals distinct defect populations across the potentials, highlighting the improved reliability of SNAP and FS-2 for radiation damage simulations in niobium.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
BARC
Homi Bhabha National Institute
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. J.T. Busby R.K. Nanstad R.E. Stoller Z. Feng and D.J. Naus Materials degradation in light water reactors: life after 60 Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-2008/170 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008.10.2172/938766 ↗
2. 10.1179/174328406X9099810.1179/174328406X90998 ↗
3. K. Ehrlich, The development of structural materials for fusion reactors, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 357(1752) (1999), pp. 595–623.10.1098/rsta.1999.0343 ↗
4. R.E. Stoller Primary radiation damage formation in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials R.J. Konings ed. Vol. 1 Elsevier Amsterdam 2012 pp. 293–332.10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00027-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.02710.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.027 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00786-710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00786-7 ↗
7. S.J. Zinkle Radiation-induced effects on microstructure in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials Vol. 1 Elsevier Oxford 2012 pp. 65–98.10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00003-3 ↗
8. A. Aitkaliyeva L. He H. Wen B. Miller X.-M. Bai and T. Allen Irradiation effects in generation IV nuclear reactor materials in Structural Materials for Generation IV Nuclear Reactors P. Yvon ed. Woodhead Publishing 2017 pp. 253–283.10.1016/B978-0-08-100906-2.00007-0 ↗
9. K.J. Leonard and C.N. Taylor Radiation effects in refractory metals and alloys in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2020 pp. 372–397.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11704-7 ↗
10. D.C. Goldberg, G. Dicker, and S.A. Worcester, Niobium and niobium alloys in nuclear power, Nucl. Eng. Des. 22(1) (1972), pp. 124–137.10.1016/0029-5493(72)90065-9 ↗
11. L.J. Pionke and J.W. Davis Technical assessment of niobium alloys data base for fusion reactor applications Report C00-4247-2 1979.10.2172/5419637 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00320-310.1016/S0920-3796(00)00320-3 ↗
13. 10.1080/00223131.2023.219852610.1080/00223131.2023.2198526 ↗
14. 10.3390/met1406064610.3390/met14060646 ↗
15. R.P. Tucker and S.M. Ohr, Direct observation of neutron irradiation damage in niobium, Philos. Mag.16(141) (1967), pp. 643–646.10.1080/14786436708220872 ↗
16. 10.1080/0033757730823226210.1080/00337577308232262 ↗
17. 10.1080/14786435.2018.142555510.1080/14786435.2018.1425555 ↗
18. 10.1016/0022-3115(95)00022-410.1016/0022-3115(95)00022-4 ↗
19. 10.1080/10420150.2013.79281410.1080/10420150.2013.792814 ↗
20. D.-Y. Lin H. Song and X.D. Hui Molecular dynamics simulation of threshold displacement energy and primary damage state in niobium preprint (2017).
21. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11047410.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110474 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.01810.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-651X/ae050510.1088/1361-651X/ae0505 ↗
24. M.R. Fellinger, H. Park, and J.W. Wilkins, Force-matched embedded-atom method potential for niobium, Phys. Rev. B 81(14) (2010), p. 144119.10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144119 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
26. 10.1080/0141861840824421010.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
27. Y. Zhang, R. Ashcraft, M.I. Mendelev, C.Z. Wang, and K.F. Kelton, Experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study of structure of liquid and amorphous ni62nb38 alloy, J. Chem. Phys. 145(20) (2016), p. 204503.10.1063/1.4968212 ↗
28. R. Qiu, Y. Chen, X. Liao, Y. Lin, Y. Dou, X. He, W. Yang, W. Hu, and H. Deng, Development of a semi-empirical interatomic potential appropriate for the radiation defects in v-ti-ta-nb high-entropy alloy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 35(5) (2022), p. 055701.
29. J.F. Ziegler and J.P. Biersack The stopping and range of ions in matter in Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science: Volume 6: Astrophysics Chemistry and Condensed Matter D.A. Bromley ed. New York: Springer 1985 pp. 93–129.10.1007/978-1-4615-8103-1_3 ↗
30. 10.1107/S002188988608945810.1107/S0021889886089458 ↗
31. P.-W. Ma and S.L. Dudarev, Symmetry-broken self-interstitial defects in chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 (2019), p. 043606.10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.043606 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.02010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
33. D. Errandonea, L. Burakovsky, D.L. Preston, S.G. MacLeod, D. Santamaría-Perez, S. Chen, H. Cynn, S.I. Simak, M.I. McMahon, J.E. Proctor, and M. Mezouar, Experimental and theoretical confirmation of an orthorhombic phase transition in niobium at high pressure and temperature, Commun. Mater. 1 (2020), p. 58.10.1038/s43246-020-00058-2 ↗
34. J.H. Jung, P. Srinivasan, A. Forslund, and B. Grabowski, High-accuracy thermodynamic properties to the melting point from ab initio calculations aided by machine-learning potentials, npj Comput. Mater. 9 (2023), p. 3.10.1038/s41524-022-00956-8 ↗
35. J.R. Rumble, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 100th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2019.
36. G.S. Was, Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2016.
37. 10.1080/0033757750823742610.1080/00337577508237426 ↗
38. P. Ehrhart, Atomic Defects in Metals, Landolt-Börnsteinl, group III: condensed matter Vol. 25, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
39. ASTM International Astm e521-96(2009)e1: standard practice for neutron radiation damage simulation by charged-particle irradiation Tech. Rep. E521-96(2009)e1 West Conshohocken PA 2009.
40. M. Nastasi, J.W. Mayer, and J.K. Hirvonen, Ion-Solid Interactions: Fundamentals and Applications, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511565007 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.06.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.06.005 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.01210.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.012 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.44907110.1063/1.449071 ↗
45. H. Hemani A. Majalee U. Bhardwaj A. Arya K. Nordlund and M. Warrier Inclusion and validation of electronic stopping in the open source lammps code preprint (2020).
46. 10.1103/PhysRev.124.12810.1103/PhysRev.124.128 ↗
47. U. Bhardwaj, H. Hemani, M. Warrier, N. Semwal, K. Ali, and A. Arya, Csaransh: software suite to study molecular dynamics simulations of collision cascades, J. Open Source Softw. 4(41) (2019), p. 1461.10.21105/joss.01461 ↗
48. U. Bhardwaj, A.E. Sand, and M. Warrier, Classification of clusters in collision cascades, Comput. Mater. Sci. 172 (2020), p. 109364.10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109364 ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-651X/ad4b4b10.1088/1361-651X/ad4b4b ↗
50. M. Ester H.-P. Kriegel J. Sander and X. Xu A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'96) AAAI Press Portland OR 1996 pp. 226–231.
51. L. Sun M.-L. Qin Y.-X. Yang X.-H. Yan Y. Ma and Z.-F. Tong Molecular dynamics simulations on the primary displacement cascade in molybdenum-niobium alloys preprint (2024).10.2139/ssrn.5009510 ↗
52. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/22/22540210.1088/0953-8984/27/22/225402 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.nme.2023.10139410.1016/j.nme.2023.101394 ↗
54. D. Terentyev, C. Lagerstedt, P. Olsson, K. Nordlund, J. Wallenius, C.S. Becquart, and L. Malerba, Effect of the interatomic potential on the features of displacement cascades in α-fe: a molecular dynamics study, J. Nucl. Mater. 351(1) (2006), pp. 65–77.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.020 ↗
55. 10.1080/1478643090311714110.1080/14786430903117141 ↗
56. 10.1088/1361-651X/ac095d10.1088/1361-651X/ac095d ↗
57. 10.1080/0141861020823568310.1080/01418610208235683 ↗
58. M. Warrier and U. Bhardwaj Defect cluster morphology in w from collision cascades: results comparing five interatomic potentials preprint (2024).
59. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.15189310.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151893 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.15393810.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153938 ↗
61. J. Liu, J. Byggmästar, Z. Fan, P. Qian, and Y. Su, Large-scale machine-learning molecular dynamics simulation of primary radiation damage in tungsten, Phys. Rev. B. 108(5) (2023), p. 054312.10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054312 ↗