journal article·2026-01-16

Analysis of divergent dynamics of exactly factorised electron-nuclear wavefunctions

Julian Stetzler, Sophya Garashchuk, Vitaly A. Rassolov

Publisher page

Abstract

The exact factorisation (XF) of molecular wavefunctions can be viewed as an ‘electronic wavepacket’ framework for quantum dynamics. It is an appealing alternative to the conventional non-adiabatic dynamics, unfolding in the space of coupled electronic eigenstates. However, the implementation of the non-linear XF equations for general systems presents a formidable challenge: the XF counterparts to the non-adiabatic coupling involve division by the nuclear probability density, which leads to severe numerical instabilities in the low-density regions of space. In case of the non-adiabatic dynamics, the effect of coupling is relatively smooth, but this theoretical framework becomes impractical when numerous electronic states are involved. In this paper, the origin of the XF-specific challenge is analysed analytically. We demonstrate that the problem arises when the factorised wavefunction diverges, even without the explicit coupling of the Born–Huang electronic states used to describe the molecular wavefunction. Using a ‘minimal’ model of the photodissociation, we derive expressions for the XF dynamics and locate the source of the XF instability. We analyse the dependence of this instability on the nuclear wavefunction bifurcation in the stationary and moving frames of reference, the latter associated with the quantum trajectory ensemble describing the nuclear XF wavepacket in a compact form. We show that the near-singular behaviour persists in the moving frame and in the atomic basis representation of the electronic wavefunction. This model and insight into the root of the XF implementation challenge will help to address the issue, leading to further development of the XF methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems · Atomic and Molecular Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of South Carolina

Funding

National Science Foundation of U.S.A. · Division of Chemistry

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. J.C. Tully, Chemical dynamics at metal surfaces, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51 (2000), pp. 153–178.10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.153 ↗
2. N. Shenvi, S. Roy, and J.C. Tully, Nonadiabatic dynamics at metal surfaces: Independent-electron surface hopping, J. Chem. Phys. 130 (2009), p. 174107.10.1063/1.3125436 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-021-00289-w10.1038/s41578-021-00289-w ↗
4. J.M. Frost, L.D. Whalley, and A. Walsh, Slow cooling of hot polarons in halide perovskite solar cells, ACS Energy Lett. 2 (2017), pp. 2647–2652.10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00862 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0066210.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00662 ↗
6. A. Abedi, N.T. Maitra, and E.K.U. Gross, Exact factorization of the time-dependent electron-nuclear wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010), p. 123002.10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.123002 ↗
7. R. Martinazzo and I. Burghardt, Quantum dynamics with electronic friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), p. 206002.10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.206002 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c0101910.1021/acs.jctc.2c01019 ↗
9. N.M. Hoffman, H. Appel, A. Rubio, and N.T. Maitra, Light-matter interactions via the exact factorization approach, Eur. Phys. J. B 91 (2018), p. 14.
10. A. Abedi, E. Khosravi, and I.V. Tokatly, Shedding light on correlated electron–photon states using the exact factorization, Eur. Phys. J. B 91 (2018), p. 12.10.1140/epjb/e2018-90243-1 ↗
11. E. Sangiogo Gil, D. Lauvergnat, and F. Agostini, Exact factorization of the photon–electron–nuclear wavefunction: Formulation and coupled-trajectory dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 161 (2024), p. 084112.10.1063/5.0224779 ↗
12. S.K. Min, F. Agostini, and E.K.U. Gross, Coupled-trajectory quantum-classical approach to electronic decoherence in nonadiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), p. 073001.10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.073001 ↗
13. D. Han and A.V. Akimov, Nonadiabatic dynamics with exact factorization: Implementation and assessment, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20 (2024), pp. 5022–5042.10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00343 ↗
14. L. Dupuy, A. Rikus, and N.T. Maitra, Exact-factorization-based surface hopping without velocity adjustment, J. Phys. Chem. Lett 15 (2024), pp. 2643–2649.10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00115 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5CP03418C10.1039/C5CP03418C ↗
16. A. Abedi, N.T. Maitra, and E.K.U. Gross, Correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction. J. Chem. Phys. 137 (2012), p. 22A530.10.1063/1.4745836 ↗
17. S. Shin and H. Metiu, Nonadiabatic effects on the charge transfer rate constant: A numerical study of a simple model system, J. Chem. Phys. 102 (1995), pp. 9285–9295.10.1063/1.468795 ↗
18. F.G. Eich and F. Agostini, The adiabatic limit of the exact factorization of the electron-nuclear wave function. J. Chem. Phys. 145 (2016), p. 054110.10.1063/1.4959962 ↗
19. 10.1002/9781119417774.ch1710.1002/9781119417774.ch17 ↗
20. F. Agostini and B.F.E. Curchod, When the exact factorization meets conical intersections…, Eur. Phys. J. B 91 (2018), p. 11.10.1140/epjb/e2018-90117-6 ↗
21. A. Abedi, F. Agostini, Y. Suzuki, and E.K.U. Gross, Dynamical steps that bridge piecewise adiabatic shapes in the exact time-dependent potential energy surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013), p. 263001.10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263001 ↗
22. B.F.E. Curchod, F. Agostini, and I. Tavernelli, CT-MQC – a coupled-trajectory mixed quantum/classical method including nonadiabatic quantum coherence effects, Eur. Phys. J. B 91 (2018), p. 12.
23. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0124910.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01249 ↗
24. 10.1039/D4CP02489C10.1039/D4CP02489C ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.10562710.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105627 ↗
26. G.H. Gossel, L. Lacombe, and N.T. Maitra, On the numerical solution of the exact factorization equations, J. Chem. Phys. 150 (2019), p. 154112.10.1063/1.5090802 ↗
27. J. Stetzler S. Garashchuk and V.A. Rassolov Factorized electron-nuclear dynamics with effective complex potential: On-the-fly implementation for H2+ in a laser field (2025). Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07483.
28. 10.1103/PhysRev.85.16610.1103/PhysRev.85.166 ↗
29. R.E. Wyatt, Quantum dynamics with trajectories: Introduction to quantum hydrodynamics, Springer-Verlag, Springer New York, NY, 2005.
30. S. Garashchuk V. Rassolov and O. Prezhdo. Semiclassical Bohmian dynamics. Reviews in Computational Chemistry chap. 6 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Hoboken NJ USA 2010 pp. 287–368.10.1002/9780470890905.ch6 ↗
31. L. Cruz-Rodríguez, L. Uranga-Piña, A. Martínez-Mesa, and C. Meier, Interacting trajectory representation of quantum dynamics: Influence of boundary conditions on the tunneling decay of resonant states. J. Phys. B 56 (2023), p. 035101.10.1088/1361-6455/acb0b0 ↗
32. L. Dupuy, G. Parlant, B. Poirier, and Y. Scribano, Direct and accurate calculation of dwell times and time delays using quantum trajectories, Phys. Lett. A 456 (2022), p. 128548.10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128548 ↗
33. 10.1080/00268976.2024.233480510.1080/00268976.2024.2334805 ↗
34. A.S. Sanz and S. Miret-Artés, A causal look into the quantum Talbot effect, J. Chem. Phys. 126 (2007), p. 234106.10.1063/1.2741555 ↗
35. 10.1088/1742-6596/2883/1/01201110.1088/1742-6596/2883/1/012011 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.163326310.1063/1.1633263 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00214-005-0032-x10.1007/s00214-005-0032-x ↗
38. B. Smith and A.V. Akimov, Entangled trajectories Hamiltonian dynamics for treating quantum nuclear effects, J. Chem. Phys. 148 (2018), p. 144106.10.1063/1.5022573 ↗
39. C.C. Martens, Surface hopping without momentum jumps: A quantum-trajectory-based approach to nonadiabatic dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A. 123 (2019), pp. 1110–1128.10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10487 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0175110.1021/acs.jctc.4c01751 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0084410.1021/acs.jctc.9b00844 ↗
42. E.R. Bittner, J.B. Maddox, and I. Burghardt, Relaxation of quantum hydrodynamic modes, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 89 (2002), pp. 313–321.10.1002/qua.10283 ↗
43. B. Poirier, Reconciling semiclassical and Bohmian mechanics. VI. Multidimensional dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 129 (2008), p. 084103.10.1063/1.2969102 ↗
44. S.V. Mousavi and S. Miret-Artes, Stochastic bohmian mechanics within the Schrodinger-Langevin framework: A trajectory analysis of wave-packet dynamics in a fluctuative-dissipative medium. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 (2019), p. 311.10.1140/epjp/i2019-12672-4 ↗
45. R.E. Wyatt, C.L. Lopreore, and G. Parlant, Electronic transitions with quantum trajectories, J. Chem. Phys. 114 (2001), pp. 5113–5116.10.1063/1.1357203 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c0074410.1021/acs.jctc.2c00744 ↗
47. S. Garashchuk, V.A. Rassolov, and G.C. Schatz, Semiclassical nonadiabatic dynamics based on quantum trajectories for the O(3P,1D)+H2 system, J. Chem. Phys. 124 (2006), p. 244307.10.1063/1.2208615 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.153542110.1063/1.1535421 ↗
49. P. Schürger, Y. Lassmann, F. Agostini, and B.F.E. Curchod, On the connection between the exact factorization and the Born–Huang representation of the molecular wavefunction, J. Chem. Phys. 162 (2025), p. 196101.10.1063/5.0254090 ↗