On the mechanism of shear-coupled grain boundary migration in FCC crystals
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the possible mechanisms of metal plasticity is shear-coupled migration of grain boundaries under applied mechanical stress. Several different approaches to the description of shear-coupled migration of grain boundaries and to the prediction of the coupling factor exist in the literature. Some of them are based on the solution of Frank–Bilby equation and consideration of grain boundary (GB) dislocation content; other is based on consideration of disconnection glide along the GB. The first approach describes the boundary as an array of dislocations; the second one considers the glide of disconnection along a dislocation-free boundary. Despite the existence of opinions that these approaches are incompatible, we demonstrate internal interrelation between them by consideration of shear-coupled migration of Σ3(111) boundary in face-centred cubic copper. It is demonstrated that there is no contradiction between approaches and their combination can help to understand the physical mechanisms of shear-coupled boundary migration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics of Materials, Czech Academy of Sciences
Brno University of Technology
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences
RWTH Aachen University
Kumamoto University
Funding
the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.01710.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.017 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.183553110.1063/1.1835531 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.01210.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.06010.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.060 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.00710.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.007 ↗
9. E.W. Kelley and W. Hosford, Plane-strain compression of magnesium and magnesium alloy crystals. Trans Met Soc AIME 242 (1968), pp. 5–13.
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.02310.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.00410.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.05710.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.057 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X ↗
15. 10.1080/1478643050053690910.1080/14786430500536909 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.10.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.10.002 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.502.15710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.502.157 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.00510.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.005 ↗
19. 10.21105/joss.0090010.21105/joss.00900 ↗
20. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
21. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478643080220648210.1080/14786430802206482 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.172282410.1063/1.1722824 ↗
24. 10.1080/0950083070159149310.1080/09500830701591493 ↗