journal article·2025-07-03

Study of the boundary migration of recrystallized grains under inhomogeneous deformation field by crystal plasticity – phase field simulation

Qinghe Wei, Lin Yuan, Debin Shan, Bin Guo

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 105· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, a grain boundary (GB) migration model based on crystal plasticity (CP) and phase field (PF) was constructed for recrystallization of magnesium alloys. The model introduced the stored energy field obtained by CP into the PF simulations, aiming to analyze the effect of the inhomogeneous stored energy generated under the plastic deformation on the GB migration. It was found that the curvature plays a more significant role in the inhomogeneous stored energy field than in the uniform deformation field. Although grains with hard orientation have a lower deformation storage energy, they are still partially swallowed due to mutual influence between GBs near the triple junction. The high energies in the original GBs increase the migration rate at the triple junctions locally for a short period of time, but it is not enough to make a significant difference over extended periods at mesoscopic scales. The simulation results in this study are helpful in explaining the previous experimental observations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Key Laboratory for Precision Hot Processing of Metals

Harbin Institute of Technology

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14786435.2023.218067910.1080/14786435.2023.2180679 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11260210.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112602 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.03310.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.033 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.10551510.1016/j.jmps.2023.105515 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11059210.1016/j.matdes.2022.110592 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-020-00879-z10.1038/s41563-020-00879-z ↗
7. 10.1080/14786435.2019.169507110.1080/14786435.2019.1695071 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10387210.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103872 ↗
9. 10.1080/1364281990820574410.1080/13642819908205744 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.03.01310.1016/j.cageo.2007.03.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00079-X10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00079-X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.03610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.036 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.02610.1016/j.jmps.2016.02.026 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.032 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1575210.1103/PhysRevB.50.15752 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00200-510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00200-5 ↗
17. C.E. Krill and L.Q. Chen, Computer simulation of 3-D grain growth using a phase-field model. Acta Mater. 50 (2002), pp. 3057–3073.
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00078-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00078-2 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.02411310.1103/PhysRevB.78.024113 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.03010.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.030 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-017-04087-910.1038/s41598-017-04087-9 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11737710.1016/j.actamat.2021.117377 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.03010.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.030 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10385410.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103854 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.08.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2017.08.004 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.05410310.1103/PhysRevB.88.054103 ↗
30. 10.1088/0965-0393/20/2/02400210.1088/0965-0393/20/2/024002 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11661-012-1177-610.1007/s11661-012-1177-6 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRev.107.97210.1103/PhysRev.107.972 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.04810.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.048 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mtla.2023.10198910.1016/j.mtla.2023.101989 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11816910.1016/j.actamat.2022.118169 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jma.2023.01.02110.1016/j.jma.2023.01.021 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.00510.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.06.00810.1016/j.jmst.2019.06.008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.11210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.112 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13400610.1016/j.matlet.2023.134006 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.04010.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.040 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11418710.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114187 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.16610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.166 ↗