journal article·2009-12Open access

Atomistic-scale modelling of nanoindentation into optical coatings

I. Gheewala, S.D. Kenny, R. Smith

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 89· Issue 34-36

Abstract

Simulations of nanoindentation into a typical optical-coatings stack employed in energy efficient glazing have been performed using classical molecular dynamics (MD) and a coupled finite element/MD methodology. The coatings stack consists of a low-emissivity material, Ag, sandwiched between two layers of a transparent conducting oxide (TCO), ZnO. Simulations into both the ZnO and the coatings stack show a strong interaction between the tip symmetry and crystal symmetry in the observed displacement field. A large amount of elastic recovery is observed for both the ZnO system and the coatings stack, but with an impression left on the surface that looks like a crack but extends no further than the tip imprint at maximum depth. The full stack is observed to have a lower hardness once there is a significant penetration of the displacement field into the Ag, when compared to the pure ZnO system. A comparison between the coupled finite element/MD methodology and the fixed boundary MD-only model shows that the boundary conditions have little influence on the calculated results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-710.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-610.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.93010.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930 ↗
4. 10.1088/0031-8949/1987/T19A/01010.1088/0031-8949/1987/T19A/010 ↗
5. 10.1080/0141861830823491410.1080/01418618308234914 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.248.4954.45410.1126/science.248.4954.454 ↗
8. 10.1088/0953-8984/2/24/00410.1088/0953-8984/2/24/004 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.474810.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4748 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature0086510.1038/nature00865 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.24540510.1103/PhysRevB.67.245405 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.10410510.1103/PhysRevB.67.104105 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.03610110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.036101 ↗
14. 10.1163/156856108X30690210.1163/156856108X306902 ↗
15. 10.1088/0957-4484/9/2/01410.1088/0957-4484/9/2/014 ↗
16. 10.1088/0957-4484/12/3/32810.1088/0957-4484/12/3/328 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.03010.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.030 ↗
18. McGee E · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2007 · 98 · 43010.3139/146.101489 ↗
19. Allen MP · 2000
20. 10.1063/1.44811810.1063/1.448118 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.210.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.2 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
23. Biersack JP · 1985
24. 10.1080/0141861870820448510.1080/01418618708204485 ↗
25. 10.1080/0141861840824421010.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/29/00310.1088/0953-8984/18/29/003 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.20542310.1103/PhysRevB.75.205423 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRev.114.68710.1103/PhysRev.114.687 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853-007-2137-110.1007/s10853-007-2137-1 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.144817510.1063/1.1448175 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.00810.1016/j.msea.2006.11.008 ↗
32. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/7/07400910.1088/0022-3727/41/7/074009 ↗
33. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/18/S0110.1088/0022-3727/40/18/S01 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.13110.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.131 ↗