journal article·2014-09-02

Effects of solutes on the thermal stability of nanotwinned materials

Valery Borovikov, Mikhail I. Mendelev, Alexander H. King

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 94· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoscale twins form in many metallic materials, especially those with low stacking fault energy. Their presence can significantly enhance the strength of a material. However, nanotwins are unstable and can be annihilated, e.g. by thermal annealing. We present the results of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which demonstrate that additions of solutes can significantly stabilize nanotwinned structures. The MD simulations reveal that the mechanism of the solute drag on the twin boundary may be associated not with the solute segregation on the incoherent twin boundary (ITB), but rather with changing of the ITB shape or position to accommodate as many solutes as possible.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

,

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.115961010.1126/science.1159610 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.116764110.1126/science.1167641 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.06610.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.066 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.181443110.1063/1.1814431 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.02810.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.028 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.04910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.049 ↗
8. X. Zhang, H. Wang, X.H. Chen, L. Lu, K. Lu, R.G. Hoagland and A. Misra, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) p.3.
9. 10.1063/1.477258910.1063/1.4772589 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.01310.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.013 ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2012.37610.1557/jmr.2012.376 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.291332210.1063/1.2913322 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11837-008-0123-y10.1007/s11837-008-0123-y ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.02210.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.022 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.366940410.1063/1.3669404 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.031 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-008-2870-010.1007/s10853-008-2870-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00079-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00079-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-710.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/0956-716X(90)90101-L10.1016/0956-716X(90)90101-L ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.04510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.045 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.048 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.031 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.00910.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.01110.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.011 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.213787110.1063/1.2137871 ↗
27. 10.1016/0001-6160(57)90109-810.1016/0001-6160(57)90109-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/0001-6160(62)90092-510.1016/0001-6160(62)90092-5 ↗
29. K. Lucke and H.P. Stuwe, On the Theory of Grain Boundary Motion, in Recovery and recrystallization of metals, L. Himmel, ed., Interscience, New York, 1963, p.171.
30. M.I. Mendelev and D.J. Srolovitz, Philos. Mag. A-Phys. Condens. Matter Struct. Defect Mech. Prop. 81 (2001) p.2243.
31. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. 10.1088/0965-0393/14/5/00210.1088/0965-0393/14/5/002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.01510.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat155910.1038/nmat1559 ↗
35. 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/04501710.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045017 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.317697910.1063/1.3176979 ↗
37. 10.1557/JMR.2005.002410.1557/JMR.2005.0024 ↗