Importance of solute–solute interactions on glass formability
Source abstract
Abstract
Microalloying experiments on amorphous Al84La4Er2Ni8TM2 alloys were performed with the substitution of all 3d TM (transition metal) elements and one 4d TM element. The critical thickness of the amorphous alloys was used as a criterion for glass formability in this system. The results show that, other than atomic size differences and the negative heats of mixing among the solvent and solute atoms, the atomic interactions among the solute atoms play an important role on glass formation. When the solute–solute interaction becomes repulsive (positive heat of mixing), glass formability suffers. Similarly, when the solute–solute interaction becomes highly attractive, exceeding that between the solvent and solute atoms, glass formability is also degraded. Evaluation of a large number of known multicomponent bulk metallic glasses provides additional support to these conjectures. This study shows that the solute–solute interaction plays an important role in glass formation, which has not been recognized previously.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Department of Physics , Washington University in St , Louis , MO 63130 , USA
b Center for Materials Innovation, Washington University in St , Louis , MO 63130 , USA
c National Metallurgical Laboratory, CSIR , Jamshedpur 831007 , India
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Davies HA · 1983 · 8
2. 10.1146/annurev.pc.35.100184.00132510.1146/annurev.pc.35.100184.001325 ↗
3. 10.1038/339363a010.1038/339363a0 ↗
4. 10.1557/S088376940005325210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
5. 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90210-210.1016/0022-3093(84)90210-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00005-X10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00005-X ↗
7. 10.1080/147864303100009882810.1080/1478643031000098828 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.00210.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.002 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0442110.1038/nature04421 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.04910.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.049 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.18410210.1103/PhysRevB.77.184102 ↗
12. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/45/45521210.1088/0953-8984/19/45/455212 ↗
13. 10.1143/JJAP.27.L28010.1143/JJAP.27.L280 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.241.4873.164010.1126/science.241.4873.1640 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.06.06310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.06.063 ↗
16. A.K. Gangopadhyay; unpublished
17. 10.1080/0141861000821211010.1080/01418610008212110 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.214936810.1063/1.2149368 ↗
19. de Boer FR · 1988
20. 10.1016/0378-4363(80)90054-610.1016/0378-4363(80)90054-6 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature0229510.1038/nature02295 ↗
22. 10.1038/336366a010.1038/336366a0 ↗
23. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90064-Y10.1016/0956-7151(93)90064-Y ↗
24. 10.1016/j.intermet.2005.06.00910.1016/j.intermet.2005.06.009 ↗
25. Kittel , C . 1996. Introduction to Solid State Physics,, 7th, 78New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Z.O. Lu and C.T. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. 39 (2004) p.396510.1023/B:JMSC.0000031478.73621.64 ↗
27. H. Choi-Yim, R. Busch and W.L. Johnson, J. Appl. Phys. 83 (1998) p.799310.1063/1.367981 ↗
28. Lide , DR . 1990. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,, 71st, 9Boca Raton, LA: CRC Press.
29. 10.1063/1.11736410.1063/1.117364 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.11276810.1063/1.112768 ↗
31. 10.2320/matertrans.43.320610.2320/matertrans.43.3206 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.24550410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245504 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.245501 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.02010.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.020 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.9364510.1063/1.93645 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1175510.1103/PhysRevB.59.11755 ↗
37. 10.2320/matertrans1989.39.49910.2320/matertrans1989.39.499 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.12520910.1063/1.125209 ↗
39. 10.2320/matertrans.43.322210.2320/matertrans.43.3222 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00285-910.1016/S1359-6462(03)00285-9 ↗