journal article·2004-05

High-frequency transverse-like excitations in glassy glycerol

Tullio Scopigno, Emanuele Pontecorvo, Roberto Di Leonardo, Michael Krisch, Giulio Monaco, Giancarlo Ruocco, Barbara Ruzicka, Francesco Sette

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 84· Issue 13-16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The dynamic structure factor of glassy and liquid glycerol has been measured by inelastic X-ray scattering in the exchanged momentum Q region Q=2–23 nm−1 and in the temperature range 80–570 K. Besides the propagating longitudinal mode, at low temperatures the spectra show a second non-Q-dispersing peak at ≈ 8.5 meV. This peak is the signature of the transverse dynamics which, in topologically disordered systems, acquire a small Q-dependent longitudinal symmetry component. This assignment is substantiated by a study of the temperature dependence of the intensity of the second peak. This study showed that, in the liquid, the second peak intensity vanishes when the structural relaxation time τ α approaches , a behaviour consistent with the condition τα ΩT ≫1 required for the existence of a non-relaxational transverse-like dynamics in the liquid state. Acknowledgements We thank C. Henriquet and R. Verbeni for help in handling the samples. Notes † The fitting procedure always gives χ2 values within three (about 200 fitted points and seven (low-Q) or ten (high-Q) fitting parameters; at high temperatures a further parameter is needed for the stretching of the Cole–Davidson function). In all cases the relevant fitting parameters (peaks positions) were found to be only slightly correlated with the other (maximum of the covariance matrix, about 0.7).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Material Dynamics and Properties · Molecular spectroscopy and chirality

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.525910.1103/PhysRevB.53.5259 ↗
2. Boon JP · 1980
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.825410.1103/PhysRevB.57.8254 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.507910.1103/PhysRevE.53.5079 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.123610.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1236 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.355110.1103/PhysRevB.59.3551 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.58710.1103/PhysRevE.61.587 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10051017029910.1007/s100510170299 ↗
9. –Bornstein Landolt · 1965
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.335610.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3356 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.48124810.1063/1.481248 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.213610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2136 ↗
13. Pilla O Caponi S Fontana A Montagna M Rossi F Viliani G Angelani L Ruocco G Monaco G Sette F 2002 cond-mat/0209519
14. 10.1063/1.47634910.1063/1.476349 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.558310.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5583 ↗
16. Ruocco G · J. Phys. C · 2001 · 13 · 9141
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.167810.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1678 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.01230110.1103/PhysRevB.64.012301 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.280.5369.155010.1126/science.280.5369.1550 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.8310.1103/PhysRevLett.77.83 ↗
21. 10.1209/epl/i1997-00310-110.1209/epl/i1997-00310-1 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.305210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3052 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.402610.1103/PhysRevE.52.4026 ↗