Unravelling the local ring-like atomic pattern of twin boundary in an Mg-Zn-Y alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the interactions between deformation twins and plate-like phases in magnesium alloys is one of the key issues to tailor the microstructure of magnesium alloys for better mechanical properties. The {101¯2} twin boundary with the local ring-like atomic pattern in magnesium alloy, accompanied by the interaction between deformation twin and solute atoms, has been investigated using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. We found that these boundaries featured local overlapping morphology near the intersection between deformation twins and stacking faults (SFs) enriched with solute atoms. The overlapping morphology is proposed to be induced by the asynchronous shuffling of the SFs and matrix during the twinning. The local ring-like atomic patterns shown here imply that the shearable specific SFs in magnesium alloys will increase twinning energy and resultantly hinder twinning propagation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, People's Republic of China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu University, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Overseas Researchers · JSPS KAKENHI
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0264853710.1007/BF02648537 ↗
2. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.05.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.03710.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.10910.1016/j.msea.2007.02.109 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.02410.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.024 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.122936910.1126/science.1229369 ↗
8. Liu B.-Y. · Nat. Commun · 2014 · 5
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.00110.1016/j.msea.2009.04.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.02610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.06010.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.060 ↗
12. 10.1080/0141861980823998010.1080/01418619808239980 ↗
13. 10.1080/09500839.2014.88512310.1080/09500839.2014.885123 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep3009610.1038/srep30096 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.02510.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.025 ↗
16. Geng J. · 2011 · 528 · 3659
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.05410.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.054 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.012 ↗
19. 10.1017/S143192760200059410.1017/S1431927602000594 ↗
20. 10.2320/matertrans.M201211510.2320/matertrans.M2012115 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.03610.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.036 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.06610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.066 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.481718010.1063/1.4817180 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.02010.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.06710.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.067 ↗
26. 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90103-810.1016/0956-7151(91)90103-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00132-210.1016/S1359-6454(96)00132-2 ↗
28. 10.1080/0141861960824438610.1080/01418619608244386 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.03550310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.035503 ↗
30. Liu B.-Y. · 2016 · 199
31. 10.1007/s10853-012-6890-410.1007/s10853-012-6890-4 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.00410.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.004 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.04110.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.041 ↗
34. 10.1080/1478643700823842610.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01510.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.015 ↗