journal article·2021-05-19

Tensorial permeability microstructure model considering crystallographic texture and grain size for evaluation of magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline steels

Jun Liu, Claire Davis

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 101· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

A finite element microstructure model with permeability tensors that considers crystallographic texture and grain size based on magnetic domain theory has been developed for the evaluation of magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline steels. The model has proved capable of capturing the crystallographic texture, the grain size and the vector induction effects on the effective permeability behaviours for typical textures in steels. The predicted magnetic properties as a function of the magnetic field direction enables a quantitative characterisation of the magnetic anisotropy. The predicted effective permeability maps can serve as a visual indication of the crystallographic texture from magnetic values. These features have been experimentally validated against a commercial grain oriented electrical steel featuring strong texture and magnetic anisotropy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Steel Research Centre, Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Funding

Research Fund for Coal and Steel

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1093/oso/9780198520757.003.001610.1093/oso/9780198520757.003.0016 ↗
2. 10.1038/117753a010.1038/117753a0 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRev.52.74710.1103/PhysRev.52.747 ↗
4. 10.1002/zamm.1929009010410.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-663-15884-410.1007/978-3-663-15884-4 ↗
6. 10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/30710.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.01310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.013 ↗
8. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.89622810.1109/TMAG.2007.896228 ↗
9. 10.1155/2008/17308310.1155/2008/173083 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.12.02010.1016/j.jmmm.2009.12.020 ↗
11. L. Zhou, C. Davis, P. Kok, F. Van Den Berg, S. Labbé, A. Martinez-de Guerenu, D. Jorge-Badiola, and I. Gutierrez, Magnetic NDT for steel microstructure characterisation – modelling the effect of ferrite grain size on magnetic properties, in 19th World Conf. Non-Destructive Test. (WCNDT 2016), Vol. 21, Munich, Germany, NDT.net, 2016.
12. L. Zhou, J. Shen, A. Martinez-De-Guerenu, D. Jorge-Badiola, I. Gutiérrez, P. Kok, F. van den Berg, S. Labbé, A. Skarlatos, C. Reboud, and P. Lombard, Micro and macro microstructure modelling for the influence of grain size on magnetic properties in structural steel and modelled commercial sensor outputs, in 12th ECNDT, Jun., Gothenberg, 2018, pp. ECNDT–0228–2018.
13. 10.1016/0304-8853(84)90196-310.1016/0304-8853(84)90196-3 ↗
14. 10.1109/20.71852710.1109/20.718527 ↗
15. 10.1109/TMAG.1981.106116510.1109/TMAG.1981.1061165 ↗
16. 10.1016/0304-8853(94)90527-410.1016/0304-8853(94)90527-4 ↗
17. Martin F. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2016 · 52 · 1
18. 10.1109/TMAG.1985.106415510.1109/TMAG.1985.1064155 ↗
19. 10.1109/20.31250010.1109/20.312500 ↗
20. H. Pfutzner, Rotational single sheet testers for multi-parametric testing of soft magnetic materials – a review, in 11th IMEKO TC4 Symposium on Trends in Electrical Measurements and Instrumentation and 6th IMEKO TC4 Workshop on ADC Modelling and Testing 2001, 2001, pp. 422–426.
21. 10.1109/TMAG.2018.288923810.1109/TMAG.2018.2889238 ↗
22. 10.1109/RTSI.2016.774062110.1109/RTSI.2016.7740621 ↗
23. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.246859910.1109/TMAG.2015.2468599 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.266458210.1109/TMAG.2017.2664582 ↗
25. Nye J.F. · 1985
26. 10.1103/PhysRev.42.88210.1103/PhysRev.42.882 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-408-10642-9.50007-610.1016/B978-0-408-10642-9.50007-6 ↗
28. Mathworks, Setting up your PDE, in Partial Differential Equation Toolbox User's Guide, r2020b ed., chap. 2, Mathworks, Natick, 2020, pp. 69–88.
29. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.00210.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16743910.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167439 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRev.50.107610.1103/PhysRev.50.1076 ↗
33. 10.1108/0332164041051076710.1108/03321640410510767 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.02.08810.1016/j.jmmm.2019.02.088 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0283375210.1007/BF02833752 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.09910.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.099 ↗
37. F. van den Berg, P. Kok, H. Yang, M. Aarnts, J.J. Vink, W. Beugeling, P. Meilland, T. Kebe, M. Stolzenberg, D. Krix, A. Peyton, W. Zhu, A. Martinez-De-Guerenu, I. Gutierrez, D. Jorge-Badiola, K. Gurruchaga, P. Lundin, A. Volker, M. Mota, J. Monster, H. Wirdelius, C. Mocci, G. Nastasi, V. Colla, C. Davis, L. Zhou, R. Schmidt, S. Labbé, C. Reboud, A. Skarlatos, T. Svaton, V. Leconte, and P. LOMBARD, In-line characterisation of microstructure and mechanical properties in the manufacturing of steel strip for the purpose of product uniformity control, in 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Jun., Munich, Germany, 2016.