Recycling potential evaluation of geopolymer concrete with different cementitious system used in freeze-thaw environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is a promising alternative to Ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC), with great potential in reducing carbon emissions and energy consumption. However, current mix proportion designs overlook the recyclability for future applications. This study aims to explore the recyclability of GPC in freeze-thaw environment. Different precursors (fly ash, metakaolin, red mud, and slag) were used to prepare GPC with the comparable strength level. To enhance the frost resistance of GPC, slag was implemented to replace 40 % of the precursors. After 350 rapid freeze-thaw cycles, the GPC specimens were crushed and screened to obtain recycled geopolymer coarse aggregates (RGA), and the physical properties of RGA were investigated. The results showed GPC demonstrated excellent frost resistance, withstanding up to 350 freeze-thaw cycles, except for fly ash-based GPC which failed after 150 cycles. After 350 freeze-thaw cycles, metakaolin-based, red mud-based and slag-based GPC still met the requirements of 50 years’ service life in cold regions. The physical properties of RGA recycled from the GPC could meet the quality standards for Class II recycled aggregate, highlighting the promising recyclability of GPC in freeze-thaw environment. It was worth noting that the quality of recycled aggregate depended on the performance of the parent concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Greenhouse effect: greenhouse gases and their impact on global warming10.9734/JSRR/2017/39630 ↗
2. Global climate change and greenhouse effect10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21) ↗
3. Environmental impact of cement production and solutions: a review
4. Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014 ↗
5. Professional Committee of Building Energy and Emissions, CABEE. China Building Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions Research Report 2022 [R]. Chongqing, 2022.
6. Low Carbon and Low Embodied Energy Materials in Buildings: A Review10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.017 ↗
7. Approaches for a low-carbon production of building materials: a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118380 ↗
8. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872 ↗
9. A review of properties and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete structural elements- a clean technology option for sustainable development10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118762 ↗
10. Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials10.1007/BF01912193 ↗
11. The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 ↗
12. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010 ↗
13. Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
14. Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.122 ↗
15. Advances in geopolymer materials: a comprehensive review
16. Progress of red mud utilization: an overview10.9734/ACSJ/2014/7258 ↗
17. Recovery of metals from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and red mud via a Co-reduction process10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104600 ↗
18. Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash with red mud-carbide slag for eco-friendly geopolymer preparation10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130820 ↗
19. Geopolymers made of recycled brick and concrete powder – a critical review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127232 ↗
20. Cold regions in China10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.03.001 ↗
21. Freeze-thaw durability of concrete: ice formation process in pores10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00103-3 ↗
22. Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of geopolymer concrete and portland cement concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.057 ↗
23. Chemical and freeze–thaw resistance of fly ash-based inorganic mortars10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.070 ↗
24. Alanazi, H.; Yang, M.; Zhang, D. Early Strength and Durability of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research 69 (1).10.1680/jmacr.16.00118 ↗
25. Comparison of frost resistance for the fiber reinforced geopolymer and cementitious composites
26. Durability of Geopolymers and Geopolymer Concretes: A Review10.1515/rams-2021-0002 ↗
27. Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: a review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122389 ↗
28. Freeze-thaw resistance of class F Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.166 ↗
29. Effect of Curing Conditions on Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Geopolymer Mortars Containing Various Calcium Resources10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125507 ↗
30. Freeze–Thaw cycle test and damage mechanics models of alkali-activated slag concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.006 ↗
31. Influence of Ca on the mechanical properties and microstructures of slag-fly ash geopolymers10.20517/mmm.2021.02 ↗
32. Investigation into the Effect of Calcium on the Existence Form of Geopolymerized Gel Product of Fly Ash Based Geopolymers10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.11.019 ↗
33. Xiao · 2018
34. Nagapan, S.; Rahman, I.A.; Asmi, A. A Review of Construction Waste Cause Factors.
35. A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.002 ↗
36. Recycling of geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.037 ↗
37. Interfacial evaluation of geopolymer mortar prepared with recycled geopolymer fine aggregates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119849 ↗
38. Recycled geopolymer aggregates as coarse aggregates for portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete: effects on mechanical properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117571 ↗
39. SAC, GB/T14684-2022: Standard for Sand for Construction. China., 2022.
40. SAC, GB/T14685-2022: Standard for Pebble and Crushed Stone for Construction. China., 2022.
41. A mix design method of fly ash geopolymer concrete based on factors analysis10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121612 ↗
42. Characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.104 ↗
43. Development of mix design method for geopolymer concrete
44. Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash ratio and the curing conditions on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete10.1002/suco.202000536 ↗
45. SAC, GB/T50081-2019: Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. China., China, 2019.
46. SAC, GB/T50082-2009: Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. China., 2009.
47. Geopolymeric materials prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031 ↗
48. Creep and drying shrinkage of a blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete10.1617/s11527-015-0599-1 ↗
49. Microstructural damage characterization of concrete under freeze-thaw action10.1177/1056789517736573 ↗
50. Mesoscopic damage model of concrete subjected to freeze-thaw cycles using mercury intrusion porosimetry and differential scanning Calorimetry (MIP-DSC)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.136 ↗
51. Abdullah, M.M.A.; Hussin, K.; Bnhussain, M.; Ismail, K.N.; Ibrahim, W.M.W. Mechanism and Chemical Reaction of Fly Ash Geopolymer Cement- A Review. 2011.
52. Mechanical properties and reaction mechanism of one-part geopolymer mortars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121973 ↗
53. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
54. The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate Minerals10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 ↗
55. Strength Development and polymerization reaction mechanism of sulfur-tailings-based geopolymer produced with CaO and Na2SiO3 composite activator10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135692 ↗
56. Effects of GBFS content and curing methods on the working performance and microstructure of ternary geopolymers based on high-content steel slag10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134128 ↗
57. Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.001 ↗
58. Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.121 ↗
59. The influence of calcium content on the performance of metakaolin-based geomaterials applied in mortars restoration10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.028 ↗
60. SAC, GB/T25177-2010: Standard for Recycled Coarse Aggregate for Concrete. China., 2010.
61. Freeze-thaw damage evaluation and model creation for concrete exposed to freeze–thaw cycles at early-age10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125352 ↗
62. Experimental evaluation of freeze-thaw durability of pervious concrete
63. Roles of Enhanced ITZ in improving the mechanical properties of concrete prepared with different types of recycled aggregates
64. The effects of carbonation conditions on the physical and microstructural properties of recycled concrete coarse aggregates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119486 ↗
65. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on ITZ characteristics of recycled concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129736 ↗