journal article·2023-12Open access

Behavior factor estimation for seismic design of unreinforced masonry buildings

Noura Zarzour, Maria Paola Santisi d’Avila, E. Diego Mercerat, Luca Lenti, Michel Oggero

Abstract

The use of new geo-sourced construction materials in seismic areas requires the assessment of the structure ductility in order to properly design the building. This research aims to propose a procedure for behavior factor estimation in case of using a new construction material. In particular, in this paper, the proposed methodology is applied to an unreinforced masonry building in an average-risk seismic zone. Before application for seismic design, the reliability of the selected equivalent frame modeling approach is validated by comparison of dynamic features obtained from both numerical and operational modal analysis. An existing stone masonry building is selected as case study to validate the modeling approach. A measurement campaign provides the structural response to ambient vibrations and structural damping. After validating the model in elastic conditions, the building ductility capacity is estimated using a numerical pushover analysis, for different load combinations and distributions, according to the European design code, under the assumption of perfect plasticity. The proposed procedure provides a behavior factor obtained specifically for the analyzed building, using a relationship between ductility demand and behavior factor deduced from dynamic analysis. The average ductility demand is estimated numerically, for a set of synthetic acceleration signals compatible with the Eurocode elastic response spectrum and a given behavior factor. Finally, it is suggested to verify the near collapse limit state of the building structure not only in terms of target to capacity displacement ratio but also in terms of load ratio, since it can be more restrictive in some instances.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Nonlinear analysis of masonry panels using a kinematic enriched plane state formulation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.002 ↗
2. Finite element model for masonry subjected to concentrated loads10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1761) ↗
3. Augenti N., Parisi F., 2019. Teoria e tecnica delle strutture in muratura. Analisi e progettazione (In Italian). Hoepli, Milano, Italy.
4. Benedetti D., 2004. Costruzioni in muratura: duttilità, norme ed esperienze (in Italian). Ing. Sismica, 3, 5–18.
5. Blume J.A., 1977. Allowable stresses and earthquake performance. Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, 165–174.
6. Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303 ↗
7. Brincker · 2015
8. Combination of modal responses consistent with seismic input representation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(47) ↗
9. New insights in the analysis of the structural response to response-spectrum-compatible accelerograms10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.015 ↗
10. Operational modal analysis and non-linear dynamic simulations of a prototype low-rise masonry building10.3390/buildings11100471 ↗
11. Chopra · 2001
12. Chopra · 2001
13. Cole H.A., 1973. On-line failure detection and damping measurement of aerospace structures by random decrement signatures, NASA CR-2205.
14. Nonlinear modelling of the seismic response of masonry structures: calibration strategies
15. Decree of October 22, 2010. Arrêté du 22 octobre 2010 relatif à la classification et aux règles de construction parasismique applicables aux bâtiments de la classe dite " à risque normal ", version en vigueur au 19 octobre 2021. Official Journal of the French Republic (in French).
16. Der Kiureghian A., 1979. On response of structures to stationary excitation. Report No. UCB/EERC-79/32, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
17. Optimal model through identified frequencies of a masonry building structure with wooden floors
18. EN 1998–1, 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
19. EN 1996–1-1, 2005. Eurocode 6- Design of masonry structures - Part 1–1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
20. EN 1998–3, 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
21. Ewins · 2000
22. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
23. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design10.1193/1.1586128 ↗
24. Numerical and empirical simulation of linear elastic seismic response of a building: the case of Nice Prefecture10.1193/042216EQS064M ↗
25. Galasco A., Lagomarsino S., Penna A., 2006. On the use of pushover analysis for existing masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper No. 1080.
26. Gambarotta L., Lagomarsino S., 1996. On dynamic response of masonry panels (in Italian). Proceedings of the National Conference on Masonry Mechanics between theory and practice, Messina, Italy.
27. Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identification and damage assessment10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.01.007 ↗
28. Improved evaluation of inelastic displacement demands for short-period masonry structures10.1002/eqe.2862 ↗
29. Hughes · 1987
30. Jennings P.C., Housner G.W., Tsai N.C., 1969. Simulated earthquake motions for design purpose. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earth. Eng, Santiago, A-1, 145–160.
31. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8 ↗
32. TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002 ↗
33. Interface model applied to fracture of masonry structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(63) ↗
34. Two approaches for the analysis of masonry structures: Micro and macro-modeling
35. Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:7(660) ↗
36. In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1091::AID-EQE693>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
37. Magenes G., Della Fontana A., 1998. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 5th International Masonry Conference, London, 190 –195.
38. Magenes G., 2000. A method for pushover analysis in seismic assessment of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
39. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design10.1193/1.1585778 ↗
40. Highlighting the impact of the construction history of a cultural heritage building through a vibration-based finite element model updated by particle swarm algorithm
41. Latest findings on the behaviour factor q for the seismic design of URM buildings10.1007/s10518-022-01419-7 ↗
42. Nassar A.A., Krawinkler H., 1991. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 95, The J. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
43. Newmark N.M., Hall W.J., 1973. Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities. Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, 209 –236.
44. Newmark N.M., Hall W.J., 1982. Earthquake spectra and design. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
45. NTC2018, 2018. Decreto Ministeriale 17 Gennaio 2018: Aggiornamento delle "Norme tecniche per le costruzioni" (in Italian), S.O. No. 8 alla G.U. del 20 Febbraio 2018, No. 42, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Rome, Italy.
46. Seismic capacity of irregular unreinforced masonry walls with openings10.1002/eqe.2195 ↗
47. Modal Assurance Criterion10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.551 ↗
48. A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings10.1002/eqe.2335 ↗
49. Hypothesis for shear failure in masonry joints
50. Strength capacity of masonry wall structures by the equivalent frame method10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1601) ↗
51. Numerical simulation of cracking in structural masonry
52. Digital simulation of random processes and its application10.1016/0022-460X(72)90600-1 ↗
53. Tomaževič · 1999
54. Tomaževič M., Bosiljkov V., Weiss P., 2004. Structural behaviour factor for masonry structures, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver B.C., Canada, paper no. 2642.
55. Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19) ↗
56. Properties of spectral moments with applications to random vibration
57. Vanmarcke E.H., Gasparini D.A., 1977. Simulated earthquake ground motions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, San Francisco, USA, K 1/9.
58. Veletsos A.S., Newmark N.M., 1960. Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, 895–912.
59. Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement10.1002/eqe.4290230504 ↗