Carbon-based nanostructure drug delivery systems and their biologic applications – a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Torrice M (2016) Does nanomedicine have a delivery problem? ACS Publications10.1021/acscentsci.6b00190 ↗
2. Kazemzadeh H, Mozafari M (2019) Fullerene-based delivery systems. Drug Discov Today 24(3):898–90510.1016/j.drudis.2019.01.013 ↗
3. Jampilek J, Kralova K (2021) Advances in drug delivery nanosystems using graphene-based materials and carbon nanotubes. Materials 14(5):105910.3390/ma14051059 ↗
4. Yang K, Feng L, Liu Z (2016) Stimuli responsive drug delivery systems based on nano-graphene for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 105:228–24110.1016/j.addr.2016.05.015 ↗
5. Yang K, Feng L, Liu Z (2015) The advancing uses of nano-graphene in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 12(4):601–61210.1517/17425247.2015.978760 ↗
6. Liu H et al (2017) Carbon nanostructures in biology and medicine. J Mater Chem B 5(32):6437–645010.1039/C7TB00891K ↗
7. Henna T et al (2020) Carbon nanostructures: the drug and the delivery system for brain disorders. Int J Pharm 587:11970110.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119701 ↗
8. Rao N, Singh R, Bashambu L (2021) Carbon-based nanomaterials: synthesis and prospective applications. Mater Today Proc 44:608–61410.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.593 ↗
9. Dong H et al (2014) Surface-engineered graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10(9):2086–210610.1166/jbn.2014.1989 ↗
10. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30
11. Chen K et al (2019) A TRAIL-delivered lipoprotein-bioinspired nanovector engineering stem cell-based platform for inhibition of lung metastasis of melanoma. Theranostics 9(10):298410.7150/thno.31157 ↗
12. Tang L et al (2021) Advanced and innovative nano-systems for anticancer targeted drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 13(8):115110.3390/pharmaceutics13081151 ↗
13. Su Y et al (2018) On-demand versatile prodrug nanomicelle for tumor-specific bioimaging and photothermal-chemo synergistic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(45):38700–3871410.1021/acsami.8b11349 ↗
14. Zhang F et al (2016) A dual-targeting drug co-delivery system for tumor chemo-and gene combined therapy. Mater Sci Eng, C 64:208–21810.1016/j.msec.2016.03.083 ↗
15. Inamuddin A, Mohammad A (2018) Applications of nanocomposite materials in drug delivery. Elsevier
16. Mei Y et al (2021) Reconstituted high density lipoprotein (rHDL), a versatile drug delivery nanoplatform for tumor targeted therapy. J Mater Chem B 9(3):612–63310.1039/D0TB02139C ↗
17. Augustine S et al (2017) Recent advances in carbon based nanosystems for cancer theranostics. Biomater Sci 5(5):901–95210.1039/C7BM00008A ↗
18. Harisa GI, Faris TM (2019) Direct drug targeting into intracellular compartments: Issues, limitations, and future outlook. J Membr Biol 252(6):527–53910.1007/s00232-019-00082-5 ↗
19. Kalakonda P, Kalakonda PB, Banne S (2021) Studies of electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube and polyaniline of nanoporous nanocomposites. Nanomater Nanotechnol 11:1847980421100114010.1177/18479804211001140 ↗
20. Orooji Y et al (2021) Large optical nonlinearity of the activated carbon nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation. Nanomaterials (Basel) 11(3):73710.3390/nano11030737 ↗
21. Lee DK et al (2022) Electrical and thermal properties of carbon nanotube polymer composites with various aspect ratios. Materials (Basel) 15(4):135610.3390/ma15041356 ↗
22. Kumara BN, Kalimuthu P, Prasad KS (2023) Synthesis, properties and potential applications of photoluminescent carbon nanoparticles: a review. Anal Chim Acta 1268:34143010.1016/j.aca.2023.341430 ↗
23. Qasim M, Clarkson AN, Hinkley SFR (2023) Green synthesis of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) from biomass for biomedical applications. Int J Mol Sci 24(2):102310.3390/ijms24021023 ↗
24. Rauti R et al (2019) Properties and behavior of carbon nanomaterials when interfacing neuronal cells: how far have we come? Carbon 143:430–44610.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.026 ↗
25. Wibowo A et al (2024) Carbon dots in photodynamic therapy: the role of dopant and solvent on optical and photo-responsive properties. Chemistry 30(54):e20240088510.1002/chem.202400885 ↗
26. Mohammadi R et al (2022) Fluorescence sensing and imaging with carbon-based quantum dots for early diagnosis of cancer: a review. J Pharm Biomed Anal 212:11462810.1016/j.jpba.2022.114628 ↗
27. Zarepour A et al (2024) Innovative approaches for cancer treatment: graphene quantum dots for photodynamic and photothermal therapies. J Mater Chem B 12(18):4307–433410.1039/D4TB00255E ↗
28. Iravani S, Varma RS (2020) Green synthesis, biomedical and biotechnological applications of carbon and graphene quantum dots. A review. Environ Chem Lett 18(3):703–72710.1007/s10311-020-00984-0 ↗
29. Ge J et al (2014) A graphene quantum dot photodynamic therapy agent with high singlet oxygen generation. Nat Commun 5:459610.1038/ncomms5596 ↗
30. Lin LS et al (2016) Dual-enhanced photothermal conversion properties of reduced graphene oxide-coated gold superparticles for light-triggered acoustic and thermal theranostics. Nanoscale 8(4):2116–212210.1039/C5NR07552A ↗
31. Wan Mohd Zawawi WFA et al (2021) Hyperthermia by near infrared radiation induced immune cells activation and infiltration in breast tumor. Sci Rep 11(1):1027810.1038/s41598-021-89740-0 ↗
32. Li Z et al (2019) Recent advances in nanomaterials-based chemo-photothermal combination therapy for improving cancer treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.0029310.3389/fbioe.2019.00293 ↗
33. Zhao L et al (2021) Recent advances in selective photothermal therapy of tumor. J Nanobiotechnol 19(1):33510.1186/s12951-021-01080-3 ↗
34. Silva TA et al (2017) Electrochemical biosensors based on nanostructured carbon black: a review. J Nanomater 2017(1):4571614
35. Saini D (2016) Synthesis and functionalization of graphene and application in electrochemical biosensing. Nanotechnol Rev 5(4):393–41610.1515/ntrev-2015-0059 ↗
36. Gao S et al (2024) Nanotechnological advances in cancer: therapy a comprehensive review of carbon nanotube applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.135178710.3389/fbioe.2024.1351787 ↗
37. Zare H et al (2021) Carbon nanotubes: smart drug/gene delivery carriers. Int J Nanomed 16:1681–170610.2147/IJN.S299448 ↗
38. Singh D, Ray S (2023) A short appraisal of nanodiamonds in drug delivery and targeting: recent advancements. Front Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2023.125964810.3389/fnano.2023.1259648 ↗
39. Moscariello P et al (2019) Unraveling in vivo brain transport of protein-coated fluorescent nanodiamonds. Small 15(42):190299210.1002/smll.201902992 ↗
40. Yu Y et al (2024) Hybrid cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Small Struct 5(5):230047310.1002/sstr.202300473 ↗
41. Mousavi SM et al (2021) 5—hybrid magnetic nanoparticles–carbonaceous nanomaterials (carbon nanotube/graphene). In: Ehrmann A et al (eds) Magnetic nanoparticle-based hybrid materials. Woodhead Publishing, pp 121–13810.1016/B978-0-12-823688-8.00024-7 ↗
42. Lee SS, Paliouras M, Trifiro MA (2023) Functionalized carbon nanoparticles as theranostic agents and their future clinical utility in oncology. Bioengineering (Basel) 10(1):10810.3390/bioengineering10010108 ↗
43. Ali T et al (2024) Healthcare challenges in LMICs: addressing antibiotic resistance threats, a call for comprehensive global solutions: an editorial. Int J Surg 110(5):3085–308710.1097/JS9.0000000000001165 ↗
44. Zhu X et al (2024) Antibiotic resistance and nanotechnology: a narrative review. Microb Pathog 193:10674110.1016/j.micpath.2024.106741 ↗
45. Ioannou P, Baliou S, Samonis G (2024) Nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of antibiotic-resistant infections. Antibiotics 13(2):12110.3390/antibiotics13020121 ↗
46. Zhang J et al (2024) Nanotechnology-driven strategies to enhance the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 16(3):e196810.1002/wnan.1968 ↗
47. Vikal A et al (2024) Nano revolution: harnessing nanoparticles to combat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Curr Pharm Design. https://doi.org/10.2174/011381612833774924102108405010.2174/0113816128337749241021084050 ↗
48. Nishshankage K et al (2024) Current trends in antimicrobial activities of carbon nanostructures: potentiality and status of nanobiochar in comparison to carbon dots. Biochar 6(1):210.1007/s42773-023-00282-2 ↗
49. Girma A et al (2024) Antibacterial capabilities of metallic nanoparticles and influencing factors. Nano Select 5(12):e20240004910.1002/nano.202400049 ↗
50. Yakup NF, et al (2024) Unveiling the antibiofilm arsenal: a mini review on nanoparticles’ mechanisms and efficacy in biofilm inhibition. In: International conference on science technology and social sciences–physics, material and industrial technology (ICONSTAS-PMIT 2023). Atlantis Press.10.2991/978-94-6463-500-3_16 ↗
51. Wu S, Wells G, Gray KA (2024) Engineered nanomaterials exert sublethal bacterial stress at very low doses: effects of concentration, light, and media on cell membrane permeability. Sci Total Environ 948:17486110.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174861 ↗
52. Makhado BP et al (2024) Unravelling the toxicity of carbon nanomaterials–From cellular interactions to mechanistic understanding. Toxicol In Vitro 100:10589810.1016/j.tiv.2024.105898 ↗
53. Tong C et al (2019) Daptomycin and AgNP co-loaded rGO nanocomposites for specific treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infection in vitro and in vivo. Biomater Sci 7(12):5097–511110.1039/C9BM01229J ↗
54. Ansari MJ et al (2022) Improved antibacterial activity of sulfasalazine loaded fullerene derivative: computational and experimental studies. J Mol Liq 348:11808310.1016/j.molliq.2021.118083 ↗
55. Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W (2021) Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Materials Advances 2(6):1821–187110.1039/D0MA00807A ↗
56. Riley PR, Narayan RJ (2021) Recent advances in carbon nanomaterials for biomedical applications: a review. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 17:10026210.1016/j.cobme.2021.100262 ↗
57. Madhurima VP, Kumari K, Jain PK (2024) Synthesis and study of carbon nanomaterials through arc discharge technique for efficient adsorption of organic dyes. Diam Relat Mater 141:11053810.1016/j.diamond.2023.110538 ↗
58. Ganash EA, Al-Jabarti GA, Altuwirqi RM (2019) The synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials by pulsed laser ablation in water. Mater Res Express 7(1):01500210.1088/2053-1591/ab572b ↗
59. Whitener KE, Sheehan PE (2014) Graphene synthesis. Diamond Related Mater 46:25–3410.1016/j.diamond.2014.04.006 ↗
60. Manawi YM et al (2018) A review of carbon nanomaterials’ synthesis via the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. Materials 11(5):82210.3390/ma11050822 ↗
61. Henna T, Pramod K (2020) Graphene quantum dots redefine nanobiomedicine. Mater Sci Eng, C 110:11065110.1016/j.msec.2020.110651 ↗
62. Nedilko SG et al (2017) Structure and optical features of micro/nanosized carbon forms prepared by electrochemical exfoliation. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:1–910.1186/s11671-016-1770-5 ↗
63. Haque E et al (2018) Recent advances in graphene quantum dots: synthesis, properties, and applications. Small Methods 2(10):180005010.1002/smtd.201800050 ↗
64. Nersisyan HH, Lee JH (2024) Synthesis of carbon nanostructures in solid-flame: a review of opportunities and challenges. Carbon 226:11923810.1016/j.carbon.2024.119238 ↗
65. Zhou H et al (2024) Effect of NH3 addition on the preparation of nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials by flame synthesis method. Carbon Lett 34(9):2343–235510.1007/s42823-024-00760-y ↗
66. Zainal MT, Yasin MFM, Wahid MA (2016) Optimizing flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes: experimental and modelling perspectives. Jurnal Teknologi Sci Eng 78:8–4
67. Ibrahim MH et al (2023) Control of morphology and crystallinity of CNTs in flame synthesis with one-dimensional reaction zone. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 14:741–75010.3762/bjnano.14.61 ↗
68. Xi J et al (2021) A review of recent research results on soot: the formation of a kind of carbon-based material in flames. Front Mater. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.69548510.3389/fmats.2021.695485 ↗
69. Kim C-D, Lee H-R, Kim HT (2016) Effect of NH3 gas ratio on the formation of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes using thermal chemical vapor deposition. Mater Chem Phys 183:315–31910.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.08.033 ↗
70. Russo C et al (2023) Fluorescent carbon dots synthesis in premixed flames: Influence of the equivalence ratio. Carbon 201:659–66610.1016/j.carbon.2022.09.061 ↗
71. Thangadurai TD et al (2022) A review on graphene quantum dots, an emerging luminescent carbon nanolights: healthcare and environmental applications. Mater Sci Eng B 278:11563310.1016/j.mseb.2022.115633 ↗
72. Hamzah N et al (2017) Rapid production of carbon nanotubes: a review on advancement in growth control and morphology manipulations of flame synthesis. J Mater Chem A 5(48):25144–2517010.1039/C7TA08668G ↗
73. Bhattacharjya D et al (2014) Nitrogen-doped carbon nanoparticles by flame synthesis as anode material for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Langmuir 30(1):318–32410.1021/la403366e ↗
74. Lekshmi GS et al (2021) Growth of rGO nanostructures via facile wick and oil flame synthesis for environmental remediation. Carbon Lett 31(4):763–77710.1007/s42823-021-00244-3 ↗
75. Chang BP, Gupta A, Mekonnen TH (2021) Flame synthesis of carbon nanoparticles from corn oil as a highly effective cationic dye adsorbent. Chemosphere 282:13106210.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131062 ↗
76. Astefanei A, Núñez O, Galceran MT (2015) Characterisation and determination of fullerenes: a critical review. Anal Chim Acta 882:1–2110.1016/j.aca.2015.03.025 ↗
77. Sharma A, Das J (2019) Small molecules derived carbon dots: synthesis and applications in sensing, catalysis, imaging, and biomedicine. J Nanobiotechnol 17(1):1–2410.1186/s12951-019-0525-8 ↗
78. Sagbas S, Sahiner N (2019) 22—carbon dots: preparation, properties, and application. In: Khan A et al (eds) Nanocarbon and its composites. Woodhead Publishing, USA, pp 651–67610.1016/B978-0-08-102509-3.00022-5 ↗
79. Zhao C et al (2020) Synthesis of graphene quantum dots and their applications in drug delivery. J Nanobiotechnol 18(1):1–3210.1186/s12951-020-00698-z ↗
80. Tian P et al (2018) Graphene quantum dots from chemistry to applications. Mater Today Chem 10:221–25810.1016/j.mtchem.2018.09.007 ↗
81. Hynes RJ et al (2019) 27—synthesis, properties, and characterization of carbon nanotube-reinforced metal matrix composites. In: Khan A et al (eds) Nanocarbon and its composites. Woodhead Publishing, USA, pp 805–83010.1016/B978-0-08-102509-3.00027-4 ↗
82. Pandey M et al (2024) A comprehensive review of recent developments in biomedical materials based on graphene-modified bio-nanocomposites. BioNanoScience 15(1):12510.1007/s12668-024-01757-7 ↗
83. Li J et al (2021) Promising graphene-based nanomaterials and their biomedical applications and potential risks: a comprehensive review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7(12):5363–539610.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00875 ↗
84. Adetunji CO et al (2023) Chapter 12—graphene-based nanomaterials for targeted drug delivery and tissue engineering. In: Das S, Thomas S, Das PP (eds) Novel platforms for drug delivery applications. Woodhead Publishing, England, pp 277–28810.1016/B978-0-323-91376-8.00014-8 ↗
85. Battisti A, Samal SK, Puppi D (2023) Biosensing systems based on graphene oxide fluorescence quenching effect. Micromachines 14(8):152210.3390/mi14081522 ↗
86. Bellier N et al (2022) Recent biomedical advancements in graphene oxide- and reduced graphene oxide-based nanocomposite nanocarriers. Biomater Res 26(1):6510.1186/s40824-022-00313-2 ↗
87. Raslan A et al (2020) Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-based scaffolds in regenerative medicine. Int J Pharm 580:11922610.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119226 ↗
88. Mallakpour S, Soltanian S (2016) Surface functionalization of carbon nanotubes: fabrication and applications. RSC Adv 6(111):109916–10993510.1039/C6RA24522F ↗
89. Panwar N et al (2019) Nanocarbons for biology and medicine: sensing, imaging, and drug delivery. Chem Rev 119(16):9559–965610.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00099 ↗
90. de Andrade LRM et al (2024) Biomedical applications of carbon nanotubes: a systematic review of data and clinical trials. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 99:10593210.1016/j.jddst.2024.105932 ↗
91. Wu H-C et al (2010) Chemistry of carbon nanotubes in biomedical applications. J Mater Chem 20(6):1036–105210.1039/B911099M ↗
92. Negri V et al (2020) Carbon nanotubes in biomedicine. Top Curr Chem (Cham) 378(1):1510.1007/s41061-019-0278-8 ↗
93. Liu J, Cui L, Losic D (2013) Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Acta Biomater 9(12):9243–925710.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.016 ↗
94. Liu J et al (2018) Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potentials in advanced drug delivery and cancer therapy. J Control Release 286:64–7310.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.034 ↗
95. Dubey R et al (2021) Functionalized carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties and applications in water purification, drug delivery, and material and biomedical sciences. Nanoscale Adv 3(20):5722–574410.1039/D1NA00293G ↗
96. Saharan R et al (2024) Beyond traditional hydrogels: the emergence of graphene oxide-based hydrogels in drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 94:10550610.1016/j.jddst.2024.105506 ↗
97. Li F et al (2025) A physical crosslinked pH-sensitive hydrogel based on hemicellulose/graphene oxide for controlled oral drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 289:13887510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138875 ↗
98. Han C et al (2024) Applications of functionalized graphene oxide in drug delivery and biomedical imaging. Open Access Library J 11(10):1–9
99. Yadav P, Tyagi S, Negi S (2025) A review on the properties and application of carbon nanotubes as biological nanomotors: advantages and challenges. Arab J Sci Eng 50(1):29–4010.1007/s13369-024-09288-9 ↗
100. Turcheniuk K et al (2015) Plasmonic photothermal destruction of uropathogenic E. coli with reduced graphene oxide and core/shell nanocomposites of gold nanorods/reduced graphene oxide. J Mater Chem B 3(3):375–38610.1039/C4TB01760A ↗