journal article·2023-03

Effect of metal–support interaction in Ni/SiO2 catalysts on the growth of carbon nanotubes by methane decomposition

Jeong Bin Choi, Ji Sun Im, Seok Chang Kang, Young-Seak Lee, Chul-Wee Lee

Carbon Letters· Volume 33· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate the effect of the catalyst and metal–support interaction on the methane decomposition behavior and physical properties of the produced carbon, catalytic decomposition of methane (CDM) was studied using Ni/SiO2 catalysts with different metal–support interactions (synthesized based on the presence or absence of urea). During catalyst synthesis, the addition of urea led to uniform and stable precipitation of the Ni metal precursor on the SiO2 support to produce Ni-phyllosilicates that enhanced the metal–support interaction. The resulting catalyst upon reduction showed the formation of uniform Ni0 particles (< 10 nm) that were smaller than those of a catalyst prepared using a conventional impregnation method (~ 80 nm). The growth mechanisms of methane-decomposition-derived carbon nanotubes was base growth or tip growth according to the metal–support interaction of the catalysts synthesized with and without urea, respectively. As a result, the catalyst with Ni-phyllosilicates resulting from the addition of urea induced highly dispersed and strongly interacting Ni0 active sites and produced carbon nanotubes with a small and uniform diameter via the base-growth mechanism. Considering the results, such a Ni-phyllosilicate-based catalyst are expected to be suitable for industrial base grown carbon nanotube production and application since as-synthesized carbon nanotubes can be easily harvested and the catalyst can be regenerated without being consumed during carbon nanotube extraction process.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Fan Z, Weng W, Zhou J, Gu D, Xiao W (2021) Catalytic decomposition of methane to produce hydrogen: a review. J Energy Chem 58:415–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.04910.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.049 ↗
2. Parmar KR, Pant KK, Roy S (2021) Blue hydrogen and carbon nanotube production via direct catalytic decomposition of methane in fluidized bed reactor: capture and extraction of carbon in the form of CNTs. Energy Convers Manag 232:113893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.11389310.1016/j.enconman.2021.113893 ↗
3. Keipi T, Tolvanen KE, Tolvanen H, Konttinen J (2016) Thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane: the effect of reaction parameters on process design and the utilization possibilities of the produced carbon. Energy Convers Manag 126:923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.06010.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.060 ↗
4. Qian JX, Chen TW, Enakonda LR, Liu DB, Mignani G, Basset JM, Zhou L (2020) Methane decomposition to produce COx-free hydrogen and nano-carbon over metal catalysts: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(15):7981–8001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.05210.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.052 ↗
5. Muradov N, Smith F, Huang C, Ali T (2006) Autothermal catalytic pyrolysis of methane as a new route to hydrogen production with reduced CO2 emissions. Catal Today 116(3):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.05.07010.1016/j.cattod.2006.05.070 ↗
6. Wang ZL, Poncharal P, De Heer WA (2000) Measuring physical and mechanical properties of individual carbon nanotubes by in situ TEM. J Phys Chem Solids 61(7):1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00350-910.1016/S0022-3697(99)00350-9 ↗
7. Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Giannaris C, Rubio A (2000) Single-walled carbon nanotube–polymer composites: strength and weakness. Adv Mater 12(10):750–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:10%3c750::AID-ADMA750%3e3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:10<750::AID-ADMA750>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
8. Lau KT, Lu M, Hui D (2006) Coiled carbon nanotubes: Synthesis and their potential applications in advanced composite structures. Compos B Eng 37(6):437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.008 ↗
9. Rivas GA, Rubianes MD, Rodríguez MC, Ferreyra NF, Luque GL, Pedano ML, Parrado C (2007) Carbon nanotubes for electrochemical biosensing. Talanta 74(3):291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2007.10.01310.1016/j.talanta.2007.10.013 ↗
10. Dervishi E, Li Z, Watanabe F, Xu Y, Saini V, Biris AR, Biris AS (2009) Thermally controlled synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes with selective diameters. J Mater Chem 19(19):3004–3012. https://doi.org/10.1039/B822469B10.1039/B822469B ↗
11. Chai SP, Zein SHS, Mohamed AR (2007) The effect of catalyst calcination temperature on the diameter of carbon nanotubes synthesized by the decomposition of methane. Carbon 45(7):1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.02010.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.020 ↗
12. Ping D, Wang C, Dong X, Dong Y (2016) Co-production of hydrogen and carbon nanotubes on nickel foam via methane catalytic decomposition. Appl Surf Sci 369:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.07410.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.074 ↗
13. Wang G, Chen J, Tian Y, Jin Y, Li Y (2012) Water assisted synthesis of double-walled carbon nanotubes with a narrow diameter distribution from methane over a Co–Mo/MgO catalyst. Catal Today 183(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.00410.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.004 ↗
14. Labunov VA, Basaev AS, Shulitski BG, Shaman YP, Komissarov I, Prudnikava AL, Shakerzadeh M (2012) Growth of few-wall carbon nanotubes with narrow diameter distribution over Fe-Mo-MgO catalyst by methane/acetylene catalytic decomposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-10210.1186/1556-276X-7-102 ↗
15. Liang W, Yan H, Chen C, Lin D, Tan K, Feng X, Shan H (2020) Revealing the effect of nickel particle size on carbon formation type in the methane decomposition reaction. Catalysts 10(8):890. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1008089010.3390/catal10080890 ↗
16. Wang HY, Lua AC (2012) Development of metallic nickel nanoparticle catalyst for the decomposition of methane into hydrogen and carbon nanofibers. J Phys Chem C 116(51):26765–26775. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp306519t10.1021/jp306519t ↗
17. Cheung CL, Kurtz A, Park H, Lieber CM (2002) Diameter-controlled synthesis of carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 106(10):2429–2433. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp014227810.1021/jp0142278 ↗
18. Huh Y, Green ML, Kim YH, Lee JY, Lee CJ (2005) Control of carbon nanotube growth using cobalt nanoparticles as catalyst. Appl Surf Sci 249(1–4):145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.05910.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.059 ↗
19. Yeoh WM, Lee KY, Chai SP, Lee KT, Mohamed AR (2013) Effective synthesis of carbon nanotubes via catalytic decomposition of methane: Influence of calcination temperature on metal–support interaction of Co–Mo/MgO catalyst. J Phys Chem Solids 74(11):1553–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2013.05.02310.1016/j.jpcs.2013.05.023 ↗
20. Vm S, Mohamed AR, Abdullah AZ, Chai SP (2010) Role of reaction and factors of carbon nanotubes growth in chemical vapour decomposition process using methane—a highlight. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/39519110.1155/2010/395191 ↗
21. Zhang T, Amiridis MD (1998) Hydrogen production via the direct cracking of methane over silica-supported nickel catalysts. Appl Catal A 167(2):161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00143-910.1016/S0926-860X(97)00143-9 ↗
22. Amin AM, Croiset E, Epling W (2011) Review of methane catalytic cracking for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(4):2904–2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.03510.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.035 ↗
23. Takenaka S, Kobayashi S, Ogihara H, Otsuka K (2003) Ni/SiO2 catalyst effective for methane decomposition into hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. J Catal 217(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00185-910.1016/S0021-9517(02)00185-9 ↗
24. Takenaka S, Ogihara H, Yamanaka I, Otsuka K (2001) Decomposition of methane over supported-Ni catalysts: effects of the supports on the catalytic lifetime. Appl Catal A 217(1–2):101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00593-210.1016/S0926-860X(01)00593-2 ↗
25. Aiello R, Fiscus JE, Zur Loye HC, Amiridis MD (2000) Hydrogen production via the direct cracking of methane over Ni/SiO2: catalyst deactivation and regeneration. Appl Catal A 192(2):227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00345-210.1016/S0926-860X(99)00345-2 ↗
26. Karimi S, Meshkani F, Rezaei M, Rastegarpanah A (2021) Thermocatalytic decomposition of CH4 over Ni/SiO2. MgO catalysts prepared via surfactant-assisted urea precipitation method. Fuel 284:118866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11886610.1016/j.fuel.2020.118866 ↗
27. Wang W, Wang H, Yang Y, Jiang S (2012) Ni–SiO2 and Ni–Fe–SiO2 catalysts for methane decomposition to prepare hydrogen and carbon filaments. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(11):9058–9066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.00310.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.003 ↗
28. Ye RP, Gong W, Sun Z, Sheng Q, Shi X, Wang T, Yao YG (2019) Enhanced stability of Ni/SiO2 catalyst for CO2 methanation: derived from nickel phyllosilicate with strong metal-support interactions. Energy 188:116059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.11605910.1016/j.energy.2019.116059 ↗
29. Burattin P, Che M, Louis C (1997) Characterization of the Ni (II) phase formed on silica upon deposition− precipitation. J Phys Chem B 101(36):7060–7074. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970194d10.1021/jp970194d ↗
30. Burattin P, Che M, Louis C (1998) Molecular approach to the mechanism of deposition− precipitation of the Ni (II) phase on silica. J Phys Chem B 102(15):2722–2732. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980018k10.1021/jp980018k ↗
31. Burattin P, Che M, Louis C (1999) Metal particle size in Ni/SiO2 materials prepared by deposition− precipitation: influence of the nature of the Ni (II) phase and of its interaction with the support. J Phys Chem B 103(30):6171–6178. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp990115t10.1021/jp990115t ↗
32. Burattin P, Che M, Louis C (2000) Ni/SiO2 materials prepared by deposition− precipitation: influence of the reduction conditions and mechanism of formation of metal particles. J Phys Chem B 104(45):10482–10489. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp000315110.1021/jp0003151 ↗
33. Zhang Y, Liu Q (2021) Nickel phyllosilicate derived Ni/SiO2 catalysts for CO2 methanation: identifying effect of silanol group concentration. J CO2 Util 50:101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10158710.1016/j.jcou.2021.101587 ↗
34. Zhang C, Yue H, Huang Z, Li S, Wu G, Ma X, Gong J (2013) Hydrogen production via steam reforming of ethanol on phyllosilicate-derived Ni/SiO2: enhanced metal–support interaction and catalytic stability. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1(1):161–173. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc300081q10.1021/sc300081q ↗
35. Takahashi R, Sato S, Sodesawa T, Nakamura N, Tomiyama S, Kosugi T, Yoshidab S (2001) Nanosized Ni/SiO2 catalyst prepared by homogeneous precipitation in wet silica gel. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 1(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2001.01810.1166/jnn.2001.018 ↗
36. Jorio A, Saito R (2021) Raman spectroscopy for carbon nanotube applications. J Appl Phys 129(2):021102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.003080910.1063/5.0030809 ↗
37. Li Y, Zhang B, Xie X, Liu J, Xu Y, Shen W (2006) Novel Ni catalysts for methane decomposition to hydrogen and carbon nanofibers. J Catal 238(2):412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.12.02710.1016/j.jcat.2005.12.027 ↗
38. Awadallah AE, El-Desouki DS, Aboul-Gheit NA, Ibrahim AH, Aboul-Gheit AK (2016) Effect of crystalline structure and pore geometry of silica based supported materials on the catalytic behavior of metallic nickel particles during methane decomposition to COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanomaterials. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(38):16890–16902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.08110.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.081 ↗
39. Li D, Chen J, Li Y (2009) Evidence of composition deviation of metal particles of a Ni–Cu/Al2O3 catalyst during methane decomposition to COx-free hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(1):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.10610.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.106 ↗
40. Takenaka S, Shigeta Y, Tanabe E, Otsuka K (2003) Methane decomposition into hydrogen and carbon nanofibers over supported Pd–Ni catalysts. J Catal 220(2):468–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00244-610.1016/S0021-9517(03)00244-6 ↗
41. Yoshida H, Takeda S, Uchiyama T, Kohno H, Homma Y (2008) Atomic-scale in-situ observation of carbon nanotube growth from solid state iron carbide nanoparticles. Nano Lett 8(7):2082–2086. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl080452q10.1021/nl080452q ↗
42. Li J, Papadopoulos C, Xu JM, Moskovits M (1999) Highly-ordered carbon nanotube arrays for electronics applications. Appl Phys Lett 75(3):367–369. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.12437710.1063/1.124377 ↗
43. Ago H, Nakamura K, Uehara N, Tsuji M (2004) Roles of metal− support interaction in growth of single-and double-walled carbon nanotubes studied with diameter-controlled iron particles supported on MgO. J Phys Chem B 108(49):18908–18915. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp046856y10.1021/jp046856y ↗
44. ALOthman ZA (2012) A review: fundamental aspects of silicate mesoporous materials. Materials 5(12):2874–2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma512287410.3390/ma5122874 ↗
45. Venugopal A, Kumar SN, Ashok J, Prasad DH, Kumari VD, Prasad KBS, Subrahmanyam M (2007) Hydrogen production by catalytic decomposition of methane over Ni/SiO2. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(12):1782–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.01.00710.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.01.007 ↗
46. Prieto P, Nistor V, Nouneh K, Oyama M, Abd-Lefdil M, Díaz R (2012) XPS study of silver, nickel and bimetallic silver–nickel nanoparticles prepared by seed-mediated growth. Appl Surf Sci 258(22):8807–8813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.09510.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.095 ↗
47. Yang M, Jin P, Fan Y, Huang C, Zhang N, Weng W, Wan H (2015) Ammonia-assisted synthesis towards a phyllosilicate-derived highly-dispersed and long-lived Ni/SiO2 catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 5(12):5095–5099. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY01361E10.1039/C5CY01361E ↗
48. Guo Z, Jia’e Z, Liu Y, Chu W (2018) Insight into the role of metal/oxide interaction and Ni availabilities on NiAl mixed metal oxide catalysts for methane decomposition. Appl Catal A: Gen 555:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.01.03110.1016/j.apcata.2018.01.031 ↗
49. Kutteri DA, Wang IW, Samanta A, Li L, Hu J (2018) Methane decomposition to tip and base grown carbon nanotubes and COx-free H2 over mono-and bimetallic 3d transition metal catalysts. Catal Sci Technol 8(3):858–869. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01927K10.1039/C7CY01927K ↗