Study on co-carbonization characteristics and thermal conversion kinetics of medium- and low-temperature and high-temperature refined pitch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Shang J, Liu T, Shi J, Xu X, Cui L, Li D, Wang S, Lu J (2023) Study on coke characteristics of medium and low temperature coal pitch group composition. Appl Chem Ind 52(07):1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230707.00110.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230707.001 ↗
2. Zhuang Q, Cao J, Wu Y, Zhao M, Zhao X, Zhao Y, Bai H (2021) Heteroatom nitrogen and oxygen co-doped three-dimensional honeycomb porous carbons for methylene blue efficient removal. Appl Surf Sci 546:149139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14913910.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149139 ↗
3. Manera C, Fragoso HP, Agra AA, Flores BD, Osório E, Godinho M, Vilela ACF (2023) Systematic mapping of studies on coal tar and pitch over the last five decades (1970–2023). Chem Eng Res Des 196:427–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.06.06310.1016/j.cherd.2023.06.063 ↗
4. Xie Y, He L, Li X, Yao Q, Sun M (2024) The effect of formaldehyde modification on the structure of needle coke prepared from a modified low temperature coal tar pitch. Fuel 370:131824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13182410.1016/j.fuel.2024.131824 ↗
5. Du W, Sun C, Sun Q (2023) The recent progress of pitch nanoengineering to obtain the carbon anode for high-performance sodium ion batteries. Materials 16(13):4871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1613487110.3390/ma16134871 ↗
6. Ma Z, Wei X, Liu G, Liu F, Zong Z (2021) Value-added utilization of high-temperature coal tar: a review. Fuel 292:119954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11995410.1016/j.fuel.2020.119954 ↗
7. Ma Z, Li S, Dong X, Li M, Liu G, Liu Z, Liu F, Zong Z, Cong X, Wei X (2023) Recent advances in characterization technology for value-added utilization of coal tars. Fuel 334:126637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12663710.1016/j.fuel.2022.126637 ↗
8. Han X, Guo H, Xing B, Liang H, Zeng H, Kang W, Qu X, Zhang C, Cao Y, Chen Z (2024) A facile electrospinning strategy to prepare cost-effective carbon fibers as a self-supporting anode for lithium-ion batteries. Fuel 373:132277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13227710.1016/j.fuel.2024.132277 ↗
9. Liu Q, Wu D, Wang T, Wang C, Jia D (2024) Pre-oxidating and pre-carbonizing to regulate the composition and structure of coal tar pitch: the fabrication of porous carbon for supercapacitor applications. Adv Funct Mater 34:2400556. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20240055610.1002/adfm.202400556 ↗
10. Hosseini MS, Chartrand P (2020) Thermodynamics and phase relationship of carbonaceous mesophase appearing during coal tar pitch carbonization. Fuel 275:117899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11789910.1016/j.fuel.2020.117899 ↗
11. Yang Y, Li Q, Zuo P, Qu S, Shen W (2024) Synthesis and structural evolution of coal-based mesophase pitch by hydrogenation-vacuum thermal polycondensation process. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 181:106642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2024.10664210.1016/j.jaap.2024.106642 ↗
12. Zhu Y, Zhao C, Xu Y, Hu C, Zhao X (2019) Preparation and characterization of coal pitch-based needle coke (Part I): the effects of aromatic index (fa) in refined coal pitch. Energy Fuels 33(4):3456–3464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b0016010.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00160 ↗
13. Zhu Y, Hu C, Zhao C, Xu Y, Gao L, Zhao X (2019) Thermal conversion behavior of medium–low–temperature coal tar pitch during liquid–phase carbonization process. ChemistrySelect 4(40):11886–11892. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20190239710.1002/slct.201902397 ↗
14. Tillmanns H, Pietzka G, Pauls H (1978) Influence of the quinoline-insoluble matter in pitch on carbonization behaviour and structure of pitch coke. Fuel 57(3):171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(78)90070-410.1016/0016-2361(78)90070-4 ↗
15. Qi M, Huang S, Baker N, Teng T, Liang J, Wang S, Wu S, Wu Y, Bai Y, Gao J (2024) Correlation of mesophase properties with molecular structures of pitches from different sources. Energy Fuels 38:2855–2865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c0446510.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04465 ↗
16. Tian Y, Huang Y, Yu X, Gao F, Gao S, Wang F, Li D, Xu X, Cui L, Fan X, Dong H, Liu J (2021) Co-carbonization of medium and low temperature coal tar pitch and coal-based hydrogenated diesel oil prepare mesophase pitch for needle coke precursor. Adv Eng Mater 23:2001523. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20200152310.1002/adem.202001523 ↗
17. Tian Y, Liu J, Zheng J, Fan X, Y. H, F. Gao, L. Cui, D. Li, Y. Dang, (2020) Effects of different pretreatment methods on the preparation of medium and low temperature coal pitch-based needle coke. Carbon Tech 39(06):40–45. https://doi.org/10.14078/j.cnki.1001-3741.2020.06.00810.14078/j.cnki.1001-3741.2020.06.008 ↗
18. Guo X, Wei X, Hu L, Liu X, Chen M, Xu M, Zong Z (2021) Molecular characterization of a middle/low-temperature coal tar by multiple mass spectrometries. Fuel 306:121435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12143510.1016/j.fuel.2021.121435 ↗
19. Liu H, Guo M, He Y, Zhu L, Qu B (2017) Property analysis and preliminary application of low temperature coal tar pitch. Carbon Tech 36(06):65–68. https://doi.org/10.14078/j.cnki.1001-3741.2017.06.01410.14078/j.cnki.1001-3741.2017.06.014 ↗
20. Yang Y, Dong M, Zhong Q, Li Q, Wang L, Jiang T (2022) Application and research progress of carbonization consolidation of high temperature coal tar pitch binder in formed carbon material. Chem Ind Eng Prog 41(12):6419–6429. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-028410.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0284 ↗
21. Dong X, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhan W, Gao L, He Z (2024) Synthesis and characteristics of carbon-based synfuel from biomass and coal powder by synergistic co-carbonization technology. Renew Energy 227:120458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.12045810.1016/j.renene.2024.120458 ↗
22. Zhang Y, Liu X, Tian M, Zhu Y, Hua C, Zhao X (2022) Generation and characterization of coal-based needle coke produced by the co-carbonization of coal liquefaction pitch and anthracene oil. RSC Adv 12(40):25860–25871. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra03602a10.1039/d2ra03602a ↗
23. Wang M, Li Y, Wang H, Tao J, Li M, Shi Y, Zhou X, Zhou X (2024) The neglected role of asphaltene in the synthesis of mesophase pitch. Molecules 29(7):1500. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2907150010.3390/molecules29071500 ↗
24. Zhang Z, Wang Z, Zhang L, Cui J, Guo S, Ji H, Liu Y, Zhao G, Zhu W, Jiao C, Cao Y, Liu D (2022) Study on the co-carbonization behavior of high-temperature coal tar pitch and raffinate oil of low-temperature coal tar. Fuel 310:122469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12246910.1016/j.fuel.2021.122469 ↗
25. Fan X, Fei Y, Chen L, Li W (2017) Distribution and structural analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons abundant in coal tar pitch. Energy Fuels 31(5):4694–4704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0311310.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03113 ↗
26. García R, Crespo JL, Martin SC, Snape CE, Moinelo SR (2003) Development of mesophase from a low-temperature coal tar pitch. Energy Fuels 17(2):291–301. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020109n10.1021/ef020109n ↗
27. Cheng J, Zhao X, Gao L, Zhu Y (2019) Thermal conversion mechanism and thermodynamics of mixed oil in coal-based needle coke production. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 14(5):e2356. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.235610.1002/apj.2356 ↗
28. Aprianti N, Faizal M, Said M, Nasir S, Fudholi A (2023) Gasification kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of fine coal using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy 268:126666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.12666610.1016/j.energy.2023.126666 ↗
29. Kondrasheva NK, Rudko VA, Ancheyta J (2020) Thermogravimetric determination of the kinetics of petroleum needle coke formation by decantoil thermolysis. ACS Omega 5(45):29570–29576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c0455210.1021/acsomega.0c04552 ↗
30. Singh RK, Patil T, Pandey D, Tekade SP, Sawarkar AN (2022) Co-pyrolysis of petroleum coke and banana leaves biomass: kinetics, reaction mechanism, and thermodynamic analysis. J Environ Manage 301:113854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11385410.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113854 ↗
31. Xu X, Cui L, Shi J, Liu J, Zhu Y, Tian Y, Ma M, Liu T, Zheng H, Li D (2023) Effects of co-carbonization of medium and low temperature refined pitch and high temperature refined pitch on the structure and properties of needle coke. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 169:105783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.10578310.1016/j.jaap.2022.105783 ↗
32. Xu X, Cui L, Liu J, Shi J, Zhu Y, Liu J, Liu T, Zheng HA, Li D (2023) Effect of raw material composition on the development of semicoke mesophase structure. Chem Ind Eng Prog 42(05):2343–2352. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-127610.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1276 ↗
33. Zhu Y, Zhao X, Gao L, Cheng J (2018) Pyrolysis kinetics and microstructure of thermal conversion products on toluene soluble component from two kinds of modified pitch. Carbon Lett 28:38–46. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.28.03810.5714/CL.2018.28.038 ↗
34. Morga R, Jelonek I, Kruszewska K, Szulik W (2015) Relationships between quality of coals, resulting cokes, and micro-Raman spectral characteristics of these cokes. Int J Coal Geol 144:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.04.00610.1016/j.coal.2015.04.006 ↗
35. Chen K, Zhang H, Ibrahim UK, Xue W, Liu H, Guo A (2019) The quantitative assessment of coke morphology based on the Raman spectroscopic characterization of serial petroleum cokes. Fuel 246:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.09610.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.096 ↗
36. Alade O, Gang L, Tariq Z, Mahmoud M, Shehri DA, Sultan A, AI-Ramadhan A, Mokheimer E (2022) Kinetic and thermodynamic modelling of thermal decomposition of bitumen under high pressure enhanced with simulated annealing and artificial intelligence. Can J Chem Eng 100(6):1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2413410.1002/cjce.24134 ↗
37. Naqvi SR, Tariq R, Hameed Z, Ali I, Taqvi SA, Naqvi M, Niazi MBK, Noor T, Farooq W (2018) Pyrolysis of high-ash sewage sludge: thermo-kinetic study using TGA and artificial neural networks. Fuel 233:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.08910.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.089 ↗
38. White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL (2011) Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 91(1):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.00410.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.004 ↗
39. Chacon WDC, Valencia GA, Rojas GMA, Henao ACA (2020) Drying and pyrolysis of lulo peel: non-isothermal analysis of physicochemical, kinetics, and master plots. Bioenergy Res 13(3):927–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10127-610.1007/s12155-020-10127-6 ↗
40. Ledeţi I, Fuliaş A, Vlase G, Vlase T, Bercean V, Doca N (2013) Thermal behaviour and kinetic study of some triazoles as potential anti-inflammatory agents. J Therm Anal Calorim 114:1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3123-210.1007/s10973-013-3123-2 ↗
41. Flynn JH, Wall LA (1966) A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J Polym Sci Part C: Polym Lett 4(5):323–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1966.11004050410.1002/pol.1966.110040504 ↗
42. Ozawa T (1965) A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 38(11):1881–1886. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.38.188110.1246/bcsj.38.1881 ↗
43. Kissinger HE (1957) Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29(11):1702–1706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60131a04510.1021/ac60131a045 ↗
44. Chong C, Mong G, Ng J-H, Chong WWF, Ani FN, Lam SS, Ong HC (2019) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetic studies of horse manure using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Convers Manage 180:1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.07110.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.071 ↗
45. Friedman HL (1964) Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J Polym Sci Part C: Polym Symposia 6(1):183–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.507006012110.1002/polc.5070060121 ↗
46. Coats AW, Redfern JP (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201(4914):68–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1979-052310.1515/zna-1979-0523 ↗
47. Zhang M, Shen S, Chen S, Sun Y (2000) Analysis of heavy oil fractions in high temperature coal tar by capillary gas chromatography/fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Chin J Chromatogr 03:241–246. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-8713.2000.03.01310.3321/j.issn:1000-8713.2000.03.013 ↗
48. Xie Z, Ma X (2013) The thermal behaviour of the co-combustion between paper sludge and rice straw. Bioresour Technol 146:611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.12710.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.127 ↗
49. Niu M, Sun R, Ding K, Gu H, Cui X, Wang L, Hu J (2022) Synergistic effect on thermal behavior and product characteristics during co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste tire: influence of biomass species and waste blending ratios. Energy 240:122808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.12280810.1016/j.energy.2021.122808 ↗
50. Wang R, Diao R, Wang C, Chu X (2024) Insights into co-pyrolytic behavior, emission, kinetics, synergy of bio-oil distillation residue and waxy product via TG-FTIR-MS. Fuel 357:129853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12985310.1016/j.fuel.2023.129853 ↗
51. Wu Z, Wang S, Zhao J, Chen L, Meng H (2014) Synergistic effect on thermal behavior during co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass model components blend with bituminous coal. Bioresour Technol 169:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.10510.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.105 ↗
52. Zhu X, Li K, Zhang L, Wu X, Zhu X (2017) Synergistic effects on thermochemical behaviors of co-pyrolysis between bio-oil distillation residue and bituminous coal. Energy Convers Manag 151:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.08410.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.084 ↗
53. Wang X, Ma Y, Niu R, Wang Q, Wang X (2017) Pyrolysis behaviour and kinetic of coal tar pitch modified with paraformaldehyde. Waste Biomass Valor 8:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9568-310.1007/s12649-016-9568-3 ↗
54. Lu Z, Guo S, Shen J, Xu S, Wang Y, Niu Y, Liu G, Sheng Q (2023) Evolution of structure and pyrolysis characteristics of coal tar residue after extraction. J Energy Inst 111:101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2023.10142110.1016/j.joei.2023.101421 ↗
55. Gray RJ, Cathart JV (1966) Polarized light microscopy of politic carbon deposit. J Nucl Mater 19(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(66)90133-410.1016/0022-3115(66)90133-4 ↗
56. Zhang W, Peng X, Guo J, Guo H, Cheng S (2024) Pyrolysis kinetic analysis and model constructions of different ranks of coal and validation by GA–BP neural networks. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 182:106659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2024.10665910.1016/j.jaap.2024.106659 ↗
57. Zhang L, Liu C, Jia Y, Mu Y, Yan Y, Huang P (2024) Pyrolytic modification of heavy coal tar by multi-polymer blending: preparation of ordered carbonaceous mesophase. Polymers 16(1):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1601016110.3390/polym16010161 ↗
58. Manoj B, Kunjomana AG (2012) Study of stacking structure of amorphous carbon by X-ray diffraction technique. Int J Electrochem Sci 7(4):3127–3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1452-3981(23)13940-x10.1016/s1452-3981(23)13940-x ↗
59. Montes-Morán MA, Crespo JL, Young RJ, Garcı́a R, Moinelo SR (2002) Mesophase from a coal tar pitch: a Raman spectroscopy study. Fuel Process Technol 77:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00079-610.1016/S0378-3820(02)00079-6 ↗
60. Hao Y, Yan K (2005) Discussion on rheologic behavior of coal pitch. Carbon Tech 05:49–54. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-3741.2005.05.01010.3969/j.issn.1001-3741.2005.05.010 ↗