journal article·2024-01-26

Self-Tunable, Exfoliated Oxygen-Rich Flower-like MoS2 Nanosheets for Arsenic Removal: Investigations on Substitution, Stability, and Sustainability (3S) for Maxi-Sorption

Subbaiah Muthu Prabhu, Kamatchi Rubini, Seong-Hyeon Pyo, Kalimuthu Pandi, A. Santhana Krishna Kumar, Triveni Rajashekar Mandlimath, Ji-Kwang Cheon, Jinho Jung, Krishna Kumar Yadav, Ho Bum Park, Byong-Hun Jeon

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we synthesized La-incorporated O-rich defective MoS 2 nanosheets by a simple, inexpensive, in situ hydrothermal reaction to self-exfoliate the bulky MoS 2 layers themselves so that they can readily trap hard base anions, arsenic (arsenite and arsenate), from water. Attempting to modify MoS 2 surfaces by incorporating O allows for more active sites, which is confirmed by powder XRD patterns where the exfoliated layers have a d -spacing of 0.63 nm, while the spacing for the bulky layers is 0.60 nm. The substitution of La at different equivalent ratios on the interlayer/surface improves the adsorption properties of arsenite and arsenate in simple solutions, as shown by the Langmuir adsorption density values of 0.7760 and 1.4363 mmol g –1, respectively. When the O-rich MoS 2 layers were loaded with La, the adsorption densities improved, with La1.0 equiv showing the best values among the materials studied. The presence of O and S was more responsible for the removal of arsenite ions, and La and O, together with a small amount of N, were able to remove arsenate ions from water according to the well-known Pearson’s Lewis acid−base principle. The stability of the materials was characterized after the experiments, and it was found that there was no leaching of the materials by ICP-OES and the stability was maintained after 6 regeneration cycles. With the exception of phosphate, which behaves chemically similar to arsenic, the adsorption densities were not significantly affected by the mono- and divalent anions, indicating the selectivity of the prepared materials. The synthesis cost of MoO x S 2– x was 2 times lower than that of bulky MoS 2, and its adsorption properties were 10 times higher than those of the latter. The results suggest that La-substituted O-rich MoS 2 is a potential candidate for the removal of soft and hard base metals from water.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Arsenic contamination and mitigation · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, South Korea

Department of Chemistry, School of Advanced Sciences, VIT-AP University, Near Vijayawada 522241, Andhra Pradesh, India

BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, South Korea

Department of Chemistry, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70, Lien-hai Road, Gushan District, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan

Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, Krakow 30-059, Poland

Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, South Korea

Faculty of Science and Technology, Madhyanchal Professional University, Bhopal 462044, India

Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences Research Group, Scientific Research Center, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah 64001, Iraq

Department of Energy Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, South Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s44246-023-00041-910.1007/s44246-023-00041-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.00610.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.026350510.1371/journal.pone.0263505 ↗
4. 10.1007/s44169-022-00018-610.1007/s44169-022-00018-6 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.0c1408810.1021/acsami.0c14088 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b0555310.1021/acsami.5b05553 ↗
7. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0687810.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06878 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.11510.1016/j.cej.2016.12.115 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.9b1750810.1021/acsami.9b17508 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10822910.1016/j.jece.2022.108229 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.10105610.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101056 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.7b0418510.1021/acsami.7b04185 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0126810.1021/acsomega.0c01268 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja408329q10.1021/ja408329q ↗
15. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0075710.1021/acsomega.7b00757 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.00510.1016/j.jece.2016.01.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12399610.1016/j.cej.2019.123996 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12266910.1016/j.seppur.2022.122669 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl902423a10.1021/nl902423a ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12457310.1016/j.cej.2020.124573 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0431710.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04317 ↗
22. 10.1039/C9TA02419K10.1039/C9TA02419K ↗
23. 10.1002/advs.20150019510.1002/advs.201500195 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0160310.1021/acsomega.9b01603 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16450810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164508 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11356-020-07978-z10.1007/s11356-020-07978-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.11760010.1016/j.envpol.2021.117600 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13750710.1016/j.cej.2022.137507 ↗