Carbon dynamics in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and removals: a comprehensive review
Source abstract
Abstract
Agriculture is a pivotal player in the climate change narrative, contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while offering potential mitigation solutions. This study delved into agriculture’s climate impact. It comprehensively analysed emissions from diverse agricultural sources, carbon sequestration possibilities, and the repercussions of agricultural emissions on climate and ecosystems. The study began by contextualising the historical and societal importance of agricultural GHG emissions within the broader climate change discourse. It then discussed into GHG emitted from agricultural activities, examining carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions individually, including their sources and mitigation strategies. This research extended beyond emissions, scrutinising their effects on climate change and potential feedback loops in agricultural systems. It underscored the importance of considering both the positive and negative implications of emissions reduction policies in agriculture. In addition, the review explored various avenues for mitigating agricultural emissions and categorised them as sustainable agricultural practices, improved livestock management, and precision agriculture. Within each category, different subsections explain innovative methods and technologies that promise emissions reduction while enhancing agricultural sustainability. Furthermore, the study addressed carbon sequestration and removal in agriculture, focussing on soil carbon sequestration, afforestation, and reforestation. It highlighted agriculture’s potential not only to reduce emissions, but also to serve as a carbon reservoir, lowering overall GHG impact. The research also scrutinised the multifaceted nature of agriculture, examining the obstacles hindering mitigation strategies, including socioeconomic constraints and regulatory hurdles. This study emphasises the need for equitable and accessible solutions, especially for smallholder farmers. It envisioned the future of agricultural emissions reduction, emphasising the advancements in measurement, climate-smart agricultural technologies, and cross-sectoral collaboration. It highlighted agriculture’s role in achieving sustainability and resilience amid a warming world, advocating collective efforts and innovative approaches. In summary, this comprehensive analysis recognised agriculture’s capacity to mitigate emissions while safeguarding food security, biodiversity, and sustainable development. It presents a compelling vision of agriculture as a driver of a sustainable and resilient future. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle emissions and performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Badji A, Benseddik A, Bensaha H, Boukhelifa A, Hasrane I (2022) Design, technology, and management of greenhouse: a review. J Clean Prod 373:133753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13375310.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133753 ↗
2. Shukla P, Skea J, Slade R, Khourdajie AA, van Diemen R, McCollum D, Pathak M, Some S, Vyas P, Fradera R, Belkacemi M, Hasija A, Lisboa G, Luz S, Malley J (2022) In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.00110.1017/9781009157926.001 ↗
3. Gregory RP (2022) The effect of atmospheric greenhouse gases on firm value and firm size distribution. J Clean Prod 358:131751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13175110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131751 ↗
4. Stewart K, Balmford A, Scheelbeek P, Doherty A, Garnett EE (2023) Changes in greenhouse gas emissions from food supply in the united kingdom. J Clean Prod 410:137273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13727310.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137273 ↗
5. Jiang O, Li Y, Zheng Y, Gustave W, Tang X, Xu J (2023) Cadmium reduced CH$$4$$ emissions by stimulating CH$$4$$ oxidation in paddy soils. Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11709610.1016/j.envres.2023.117096 ↗
6. Khan MN, Huang J, shah A, Li D, Daba NA, Han T, Du J, Qaswar M, Anthonio CK, Sial TA, Haseeb A, Zhang L, Xu Y, He Z, Zhang H, Núñez-Delgado A (2022) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from a red acidic soil by using magnesium-modified wheat straw biochar. Environ Res 203:111879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.11187910.1016/j.envres.2021.111879 ↗
7. Yang X, Liu D, Fu Q, Li T, Hou R, Li Q, Li M, Meng F (2022) Characteristics of greenhouse gas emissions from farmland soils based on a structural equation model: regulation mechanism of biochar. Environ Res 206:112303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.11230310.1016/j.envres.2021.112303 ↗
8. Gaines AM, Davies T, Shahid M, Taylor F, Wu JH, Hadjikakou M, Pettigrew S, Seferidi P, Neal B (2023) A novel approach to estimate product-specific greenhouse gas emissions for 23,550 australian packaged foods and beverages. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13881610.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138816 ↗
9. Khan MN, Li D, Shah A, Huang J, Zhang L, Núñez-Delgado A, Han T, Du J, Ali S, Sial TA, Lan Z, Hayat S, Song Y, Bai Y, Zhang H (2022) The impact of pristine and modified rice straw biochar on the emission of greenhouse gases from a red acidic soil. Environ Res 208:112676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11267610.1016/j.envres.2022.112676 ↗
10. Li F, Anjarsari Y, Wang J, Azzahiidah R, Jiang J, Zou J, Xiang K, Ma H (2022) Arramel, Modulation of the lattice structure of 2d carbon-based materials for improving photo/electric properties. Carbon Lett 1–1110.1007/s42823-022-00380-4 ↗
11. Song K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Hubacek K, Sun L (2022) Unequal household carbon footprints in the peak-and-decline pattern of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. J Clean Prod 368:132650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13265010.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132650 ↗
12. Sivaranjanee R, Kumar PS, Rangasamy G (2023) A critical review on biochar for environmental applications. Carbon Lett 1–2610.1007/s42823-023-00527-x ↗
13. Kamyab H, Chelliapan S, Tavakkoli O, Mesbah M, Bhutto JK, Khademi T, Kirpichnikova I, Ahmad A, ALJohani AA (2022) A review on carbon-based molecularly-imprinted polymers (cbmip) for detection of hazardous pollutants in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 308:136471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13647110.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136471 ↗
14. Tahir MA, Hamza A, Hussain S, Xie Z, Brestic M, Rastogi A, Allakhverdiev SI, Sarwar G (2022) Carbon sequestrating fertilizers as a tool for carbon sequestration in agriculture under aridisols. Carbon Lett 32(7):1631–164410.1007/s42823-022-00368-0 ↗
15. Mehryar M, Hafezalkotob A, Azizi A, Sobhani FM (2021) Cooperative reliability allocation in network flow problems considering greenhouse gas emissions: optical fiber networks structure. J Clean Prod 326:129315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12931510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129315 ↗
16. Cruz OF Jr, Campello-Gómez I, Casco ME, Serafin J, Silvestre-Albero J, Martínez-Escandell M, Hotza D, Rambo CR (2023) Enhanced CO$$2$$ capture by cupuassu shell-derived activated carbon with high microporous volume. Carbon Lett 33(3):727–73510.1007/s42823-022-00454-3 ↗
17. Ribeiro-Kumara C, Köster E, Aaltonen H, Köster K (2020) How do forest fires affect soil greenhouse gas emissions in upland boreal forests? A review. Environ Res 184:109328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.10932810.1016/j.envres.2020.109328 ↗
18. Hu Y, Thomsen TP, Fenton O, Sommer SG, Shi W, Cui W (2023) Effects of dairy processing sludge and derived biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from Danish and Irish soils. Environ Res 216:114543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11454310.1016/j.envres.2022.114543 ↗
19. Li L, Zhao C, Wang X, Tan Y, Wang X, Liu X, Guo B (2023) Effects of nitrification and urease inhibitors on ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms, denitrifying bacteria, and greenhouse gas emissions in greenhouse vegetable fields. Environ Res 237:116781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11678110.1016/j.envres.2023.116781 ↗
20. You X, Wang S, Du L, Wu H, Wei Y (2022) Effects of organic fertilization on functional microbial communities associated with greenhouse gas emissions in paddy soils. Environ Res 213:113706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11370610.1016/j.envres.2022.113706 ↗
21. A.G.J.S.S.K.W.D.D.A.J. Kacprzak M, Malińska K, Meers E (2023) Cycles of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in poultry manure management technologies - environmental aspects. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 53(8):914–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.209698310.1080/10643389.2022.2096983 ↗
22. Shaaban M, Khalid MS, Hu R, Zhou M (2022) Effects of water regimes on soil N$$_2$$O, CH$$4$$ and CO$$2$$ emissions following addition of dicyandiamide and n fertilizer. Environ Res 212:113544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11354410.1016/j.envres.2022.113544 ↗
23. Omirou M, Stephanou C, Anastopoulos I, Philippot L, Ioannides IM (2022) Differential response of N$$_2$$O emissions, N$$_2$$O-producing and N$$_2$$O-reducing bacteria to varying tetracycline doses in fertilized soil. Environ Res 214:114013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11401310.1016/j.envres.2022.114013 ↗
24. Wabo SG, Klepel O (2021) Nitrogen release and pore formation through koh activation of nitrogen-doped carbon materials: an evaluation of the literature. Carbon Lett 31(4):581–59210.1007/s42823-021-00252-3 ↗
25. Yang H, Guo Y, Fang N, Dong B (2023) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of typical sewage sludge incineration treatment route based on two case studies in china. Environ Res 231:115959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11595910.1016/j.envres.2023.115959 ↗
26. Komatsuzaki M, Ohta H (2007) Soil management practices for sustainable agro-ecosystems. Springer, Tech. rep10.1007/s11625-006-0014-5 ↗
27. Kamyab H, Chelliapan S, Hayder G, Yusuf M, Taheri MM, Rezania S, Hasan M, Yadav KK, Khorami M, Farajnezhad M, Nouri J (2023) Exploring the potential of metal and metal oxide nanomaterials for sustainable water and wastewater treatment: a review of their antimicrobial properties. Chemosphere 335:139103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13910310.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139103 ↗
28. Feng ZY, Meng LY (2021) Hierarchical porous carbons derived from corncob: study on adsorption mechanism for gas and wastewater. Carbon Lett 31:643–65310.1007/s42823-021-00231-8 ↗
29. Hu Y, Su M, Jiao L (2023) Peak and fall of china’s agricultural ghg emissions. J Clean Prod 389:136035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13603510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136035 ↗
30. Warsame AA, Mohamed J, Mohamed AA (2023) The relationship between environmental degradation, agricultural crops, and livestock production in Somalia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(3):7825–783510.1007/s11356-022-22595-8 ↗
31. Yang HY, Ahn YH (2023) Analysis of electrification and its greenhouse gas reduction potential in the industrial sector of Korea using mixed methods. J Clean Prod 419:138160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13816010.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138160 ↗
32. Xie P, Gong N, Sun F, Li P, Pan X (2023) What factors contribute to the extent of decoupling economic growth and energy carbon emissions in china? Energy Policy 173:113416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.11341610.1016/j.enpol.2023.113416 ↗
33. Lamichhane JR, Alletto L, Cong WF, Dayoub E, Maury P, Plaza-Bonilla D, Reckling M, Saia S, Soltani E, Tison G, Debaeke P (2023) Relay cropping for sustainable intensification of agriculture across temperate regions: crop management challenges and future research priorities. Field Crop Res 291:108795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.10879510.1016/j.fcr.2022.108795 ↗
34. Yahaya SM, Mahmud AA, Abdullahi M, Haruna A (2023) Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: a review. Pedosphere 33(3):385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.07.01210.1016/j.pedsph.2022.07.012 ↗
35. Zhang D, Li D, Wang H, Li H, Li R, Batchelor WD, Ju H, Li Y (2023) Tillage practices offset wheat yield reductions under limited irrigation regime in the north china plain. Soil Tillage Res 230:105687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.10568710.1016/j.still.2023.105687 ↗
36. Yun JS, Kim JH, Kang SC, Im JS (2023) Mechanism of activated carbon-catalyzed CH$$4$$ decomposition process for the production of hydrogen and high-value carbon. Carbon Lett 1–11
37. Tuohy P, O’Sullivan L, Bracken C, Fenton O (2023) Drainage status of grassland peat soils in Ireland: extent, efficacy and implications for ghg emissions and rewetting efforts. J Environ Manage 344:118391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11839110.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118391 ↗
38. Kamyab H, Khademi T, Chelliapan S, SaberiKamarposhti M, Rezania S, Yusuf M, Farajnezhad M, Abbas M, Hun Jeon B, Ahn Y (2023) The latest innovative avenues for the utilization of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in water resource management. Results Eng 20:101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10156610.1016/j.rineng.2023.101566 ↗
39. Kamran M, Yan Z, Ahmad I, Jia Q, Ghani MU, Chen X, Chang S, Li T, Siddique KH, Fahad S, Hou F (2023) Assessment of greenhouse gases emissions, global warming potential and net ecosystem economic benefits from wheat field with reduced irrigation and nitrogen management in an arid region of china. Agric Ecosyst Environ 341:108197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.10819710.1016/j.agee.2022.108197 ↗
40. Hashim H, Zubir MA, Kamyab H, Zahran MFI (2022) Decarbonisation of the industrial sector through greenhouse gas mitigation, offset, and emission trading schemes. Chem Eng Trans 97:511–516. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET229708610.3303/CET2297086 ↗
41. Abyar H, Nowrouzi M (2023) Trickling filter systems for sustainable water supply: an evaluation of eco-environmental burdens and greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Res 237:117011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11701110.1016/j.envres.2023.117011 ↗
42. Li Y, Li ZL, Wu H, Zhou C, Liu X, Leng P, Yang P, Wu W, Tang R, Shang GF et al (2023) Biophysical impacts of earth greening can substantially mitigate regional land surface temperature warming. Nat Commun 14(1):12110.1038/s41467-023-35799-4 ↗
43. Bellebcir A, Merouane F, Chekroud K, Bounabi H, Vasseghian Y, Kamyab H, Chelliapan S, Klemeš JJ, Berkani M (2023) Bioprospecting of biosurfactant-producing bacteria for hydrocarbon bioremediation: optimization and characterization. Korean J Chem Eng 1–1610.1007/s11814-023-1418-y ↗
44. Ly NH, Nguyen NB, Tran HN, Hoang TTH, Joo SW, Vasseghian Y, Kamyab H, Chelliapan S, Klemeš JJ (2023) Metal-organic framework nanopesticide carrier for accurate pesticide delivery and decrement of groundwater pollution. J Clean Prod 402:136809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13680910.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136809 ↗
45. Yingying Zhang WW, Yao H (2023) Urea-based nitrogen fertilization in agriculture: a key source of n2o emissions and recent development in mitigating strategies. Arch Agron Soil Sci 69(5):663–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.202558810.1080/03650340.2022.2025588 ↗
46. Periakaruppan R, Palanimuthu V, Abed SA, Danaraj J (2023) New perception about the use of nanofungicides in sustainable agriculture practices. Arch Microbiol 205(1):410.1007/s00203-022-03324-8 ↗
47. Francaviglia R, Almagro M, Vicente-Vicente JL (2023) Conservation agriculture and soil organic carbon: principles, processes, practices and policy options. Soil Syst. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems701001710.3390/soilsystems7010017 ↗
48. Quandt A, Neufeldt H, Gorman K (2023) Climate change adaptation through agroforestry: opportunities and gaps. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 60:101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.10124410.1016/j.cosust.2022.101244 ↗
49. Hao X, Abou Najm M, Steenwerth KL, Nocco MA, Basset C, Daccache A (2023) Are there universal soil responses to cover cropping? A systematic review. Sci Total Environ 861:160600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.16060010.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160600 ↗
50. Gao B, Li Y, Zheng N, Liu C, Ren H, Yao H (2022) Interactive effects of microplastics, biochar, and earthworms on CO$$2$$ and N$$_2$$O emissions and microbial functional genes in vegetable-growing soil. Environ Res 213:113728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11372810.1016/j.envres.2022.113728 ↗
51. Alshehri DM (2023) Blockchain-assisted internet of things framework in smart livestock farming. Internet Things 22:100739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.10073910.1016/j.iot.2023.100739 ↗
52. Karabay A, Bolatov A, Varol HA, Chan MY (2023) A central Asian food dataset for personalized dietary interventions. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1507172810.3390/nu15071728 ↗
53. Fangueiro D, Merino P, Pantelopoulos A, Pereira JLS, Amon B, Chadwick DR (2023) The Implications of animal manure management on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions. Springer International Publishing, pp 99–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19730-7_510.1007/978-3-031-19730-7_5 ↗
54. Saranya T, Deisy C, Sridevi S, Anbananthen KSM (2023) A comparative study of deep learning and internet of things for precision agriculture. Eng Appl Artif Intell 122:106034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10603410.1016/j.engappai.2023.106034 ↗
55. Darjee S, Shrivastava M, Langyan S, Singh G, Pandey R, Sharma A, Khandelwal A, Singh R (2023) Integrated nutrient management reduced the nutrient losses and increased crop yield in irrigated wheat. Arch Agron Soil Sci 69(8):1298–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.208453510.1080/03650340.2022.2084535 ↗
56. Liu A, Imran M, Nassani AA, Binsaeed RH, Zaman K (2023) Reducing carbon emissions with geoscience solutions: a look at the contributions of nuclear energy, technology, and green finance. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.10169810.1016/j.gsf.2023.101698 ↗
57. Raya I, Kzar HH, Mahmoud ZH, Al Ayub Ahmed A, Ibatova AZ, Kianfar E (2021) A review of gas sensors based on carbon nanomaterial. Carbon Lett 1–2610.1007/s42823-021-00276-9 ↗
58. Tan SS, Kuebbing SE (2023) A synthesis of the effect of regenerative agriculture on soil carbon sequestration in southeast Asian croplands. Agricu Ecosyst Environ 349:108450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.10845010.1016/j.agee.2023.108450 ↗
59. Mustafa A, Saeed Q, Karimi Nezhad MT, Nan S, Hongjun G, Ping Z, Naveed M, Minggang X, Nú nez-Delgado A (2023) Physically separated soil organic matter pools as indicators of carbon and nitrogen change under long-term fertilization in a Chinese mollisol. Environ Res 216:114626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11462610.1016/j.envres.2022.114626 ↗
60. Kozar R, Djalante R, Leimona B, Subramanian SM, Saito O (2023) The politics of adaptiveness in agroecosystems and its role in transformations to sustainable food systems. Earth System Governance 15:100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2023.10016410.1016/j.esg.2023.100164 ↗
61. Zhang B, Lan K, Harris TB, Ashton MS, Yao Y (2023) Climate-smart forestry through innovative wood products and commercial afforestation and reforestation on marginal land. Proc Natl Acad Sci 120(23):e2221840120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.222184012010.1073/pnas.2221840120 ↗
62. Ansari SA, Shakeel A, Sawarkar R, Maddalwar S, Khan D, Singh L (2023) Additive facilitated co-composting of lignocellulosic biomass waste, approach towards minimizing greenhouse gas emissions: An up to date review. Environ Res 224:115529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11552910.1016/j.envres.2023.115529 ↗
63. Low G, Dalhaus T, Meuwissen MP (2023) Mixed farming and agroforestry systems: a systematic review on value chain implications. Agric Syst 206:103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.10360610.1016/j.agsy.2023.103606 ↗
64. Mallesh D, Swapna S, Rajitha P, Soujanya Y, Sumana C, Lingaiah N (2023) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of porous carbon adsorbents derived from waste biomass for CO$$2$$ capture. Carbon Lett 1–1610.2139/ssrn.4053261 ↗
65. Rasouli K, Rasouli J, Mohtaram MS, Sabbaghi S, Kamyab H, Moradi H, Chelliapan S (2023) Biomass-derived activated carbon nanocomposites for cleaner production: a review on aspects of photocatalytic pollutant degradation. J Clean Prod 419:138181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13818110.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138181 ↗
66. Babu KN, Mandyam S, Jetty S, Dar AA, Ayushi K, Narayanan A, Somaiah S, Narayanaswamy P (2023) Carbon stocks of tree plantations in a western Ghats landscape, India: influencing factors and management implications. Environ Monit Assess 195(3):40410.1007/s10661-023-10964-w ↗
67. de Sá CD, Søndergaard N, Barioni LG, Camargo RC (2023) The Brazilian way of farming: potential and challenges to agricultural decarbonization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_810.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_8 ↗
68. Phiri C, Njira K, Chitedze G (2023) An insight of chickpea production potential, utilization and their challenges among smallholder farmers in Malawi—a review. J Agric Food Res 14:100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.10071310.1016/j.jafr.2023.100713 ↗
69. Li K, Li Q (2023) Towards more efficient low-carbon agricultural technology extension in china: identifying lead smallholder farmers and their behavioral determinants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(10):27833–2784510.1007/s11356-022-24159-2 ↗
70. Zhao N, Wang K, Yuan Y (2023) Toward the carbon neutrality: forest carbon sinks and its spatial spillover effect in china. Ecol Econ 209:107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.10783710.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107837 ↗
71. Ding T, Steubing B, Achten WM (2023) Coupling optimization with territorial lca to support agricultural land-use planning. J Environ Manage 328:116946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11694610.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116946 ↗
72. Shen X, Gatto P, Pagliacci F (2023) Unravelling the role of institutions in market-based instruments: a systematic review on forest carbon mechanisms. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1401013610.3390/f14010136 ↗
73. Yanes AR, Martinez P, Ahmad R (2020) Towards automated aquaponics: a review on monitoring, IoT, and smart systems. J Clean Prod 263:121571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12157110.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121571 ↗
74. Hu R, Shahzad F, Abbas A, Liu X (2022) Decoupling the influence of eco-sustainability motivations in the adoption of the green industrial IoT and the impact of advanced manufacturing technologies. J Clean Prod 339:130708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13070810.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130708 ↗
75. Ding S, Ward H, Cucurachi S, Tukker A (2023) Revealing the hidden potentials of internet of things (IoT)—an integrated approach using agent-based modelling and system dynamics to assess sustainable supply chain performance. J Clean Prod 421:138558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13855810.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138558 ↗
76. Pirson T, Bol D (2021) Assessing the embodied carbon footprint of IoT edge devices with a bottom-up life-cycle approach. J Clean Prod 322:128966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12896610.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128966 ↗
77. Kongboon R, Gheewala SH, Sampattagul S (2022) Greenhouse gas emissions inventory data acquisition and analytics for low carbon cities. J Clean Prod 343:130711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13071110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130711 ↗
78. Kocak E, Alnour M (2022) Energy r &d expenditure, bioethanol consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in the united states: non-linear analysis and political implications. J Clean Prod 374:133887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13388710.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133887 ↗
79. Kumar M, Choubey VK, Raut RD, Jagtap S (2023) Enablers to achieve zero hunger through IoT and blockchain technology and transform the green food supply chain systems. J Clean Prod 405:136894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13689410.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136894 ↗
80. Kopac T (2023) Current overview of the valorization of bio-wastes for adsorbed natural gas applications. Carbon Lett 1–2910.1007/s42823-023-00508-0 ↗