journal article·2023-12

Predicting the wear performance of graphene and silicon nitride reinforced aluminium hybrid nanocomposites using artificial intelligence approach

Praveen Raj, P. L. Biju, B. Deepanraj, N. Senthilkumar

Carbon Letters· Volume 33· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Hybrid nanocomposites of aluminium (NHAMMCs) made from AA5052 are fabricated via stir casting route by reinforcing 12 wt% Si3N4 and 0.5 wt% of graphene for usage in aeronautical and automotive applications due to the lower density and higher strength to weight proportion. The wear characteristics of the NHAMMCs are evaluated for different axial load, rotational speed, sliding distance and sliding time based on Box-Behnken design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). Orowan strengthening mechanism is identified from optical image which improves the strength of the composite. Outcomes show that with higher axial load and rotational speed, there is substantial increase in wear loss whereas with increased sliding distance and sliding time there is no considerable increase in wear loss due to the lubricating nature of the reinforced graphene particles since it has higher surface area to volume ratio. Besides, artificial intelligence approach of neuro-fuzzy (ANFIS) model is developed to predict the output responses and the results are compared with the regression model predictions. Prediction from ANFIS outplays the regression model prediction.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Ajayi L, Ludema KC (2018) Friction, wear, lubrication: a textbook in tribology, 2nd edn. CRC Press
2. Liu S, Wang Y, Muthuramalingam T, Anbuchezhiyan G (2019) Effect of B4C and MoS2 reinforcement on micro structure and wear properties of aluminum hybrid composite for automotive applications. ComposPart B 176:107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10732910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107329 ↗
3. Zhai W, Bai L, Zhou R, Fan X, Kang G, Liu Y, Zhou K (2021) Recent progress on wear-resistant materials: designs, properties, and applications. Adv Sci 8:2003739. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20200373910.1002/advs.202003739 ↗
4. Friedrich K (2012) Friction and wear of polymer composites. Elsevier Science
5. Omrani E, Rohatgi PK, Menezes PL (2018) Self-lubricating composites. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
6. Kar KK (2016) Composite materials: processing, applications, characterizations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
7. Hasan MS, Kordijazi A, Rohatgi PK, Nosonovsky M (2022) Machine learning models of the transition from solid to liquid lubricated friction and wear in aluminum-graphite composites. Tribol Int 165:107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.10732610.1016/j.triboint.2021.107326 ↗
8. Raja T, Prabhakaran R, Praveen Kumar D, Sathish D (2022) Mechanical and tribological characteristics of AL7075/MWCNT, B4C & MoS2 hybrid metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 50(5):911–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.26210.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.262 ↗
9. Menachery M, Thomas S, Deepanraj B, Senthilkumar N (2023) Processing of nanoreinforced aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites and the effect of post-heat treatment: a review. Appl Nanosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02704-210.1007/s13204-022-02704-2 ↗
10. Pandey S, Son N, Kim S, Balakrishnan D, Kang M (2022) Locust Bean gum-based hydrogels embedded magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles nanocomposite: advanced materials for environmental and energy applications. Environ Res 214:114000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11400010.1016/j.envres.2022.114000 ↗
11. Mahaviradhan N, Sivaganesan S (2021) Tribological analysis of hybrid aluminum matrix composites for high temperature applications. Mater Today Proc 39(1):669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.18710.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.187 ↗
12. Aabid A, Murtuza MA, Khan SA, Baig M (2022) Optimization of dry sliding wear behavior of aluminium-based hybrid MMC’s using experimental and DOE methods. J Mater Res Technol 16:743–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.00510.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.005 ↗
13. AbebeEmiru A, Sinha DK, Kumar A, Yadav A (2022) Fabrication and characterization of hybrid aluminium (Al6061) metal matrix composite reinforced with SiC, B4C and MoS2 via stir casting. Inter Metalcast. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00800-110.1007/s40962-022-00800-1 ↗
14. Vaishnav V, Kumar RP, Venkatesh C (2022) Influence of nano MoS2 particle on the mechanical and tribological properties of Al-TiB2-Gr hybrid composite. J Mech Sci Technol 36:857–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0133-710.1007/s12206-022-0133-7 ↗
15. Şenel MC, Gürbüz M (2020) Microstructure and wear behaviour of graphene–Si3N4 binary particle-reinforced aluminium hybrid composites. Bull Mater Sci 43:148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-020-02124-410.1007/s12034-020-02124-4 ↗
16. Prakash T, Sivasankaran S, Sasikumar P (2015) Mechanical and tribological behaviour of friction-stir-processed Al 6061 aluminium sheet metal reinforced with Al2O3/0.5Gr hybrid surface nanocomposite. Arab J Sci Eng 40:559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1518-410.1007/s13369-014-1518-4 ↗
17. Senthil Kumar S, Sudhakara Pandian R, Pitchipoo P, Rajakarunakaran S, Rajesh S (2021) Investigation of Al-Mg based composite incorporated with MoS2 through powder metallurgy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E 235(4):986–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440892098576110.1177/0954408920985761 ↗
18. Anitha P, Rao SM (2022) Influence of titanium diboride and graphite on microstructure characteristics and mechanical behaviors of aluminium hybrid nanocomposites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408922108081910.1177/09544089221080819 ↗
19. Kumar A, Rana RS, Purohit R (2022) Investigation of wear and friction characteristic of Al/(Si3N4)np nano composites under as-cast and heat-treated conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408922111207010.1177/09544089221112070 ↗
20. Vignesh Kumar V, Raja K, Ramkumar T, Selvakumar M, Senthil KT (2021) Studies on mechanical property and wear behaviour of AA7075 hybrid composites prepared by a conventional casting method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E 235(6):2180–2188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408921103493910.1177/09544089211034939 ↗
21. Kishore P, Manoj Kumar P, Dinesh D (2019) Wear analysis of Al 5052 alloy with varying percentage of tungsten carbide. AIP Conf Proc 2128:040003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511796510.1063/1.5117965 ↗
22. Gugulothu B, Lakshmi Sankar S, Vijayakumar S, Vara Prasad AS, Thangaraj M, Venkatachalapathy M, Janardhana Rao TV (2022) Analysis of wear behaviour of AA5052 alloy composites by addition alumina with zirconium dioxide using the taguchi-grey relational method. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/454553110.1155/2022/4545531 ↗
23. Dhinakarraj CK, Senthilkumar N, Badri MA, Anbuchezhiyan G (2020) Vibration and damping behavior of Si3N4 reinforced magnesium alloy composite for structural applications. J New Mater Electrochem Syst 23(3):182–189. https://doi.org/10.14447/jnmes.v23i3.a0510.14447/jnmes.v23i3.a05 ↗
24. Abdelatty R, Khan A, Yusuf M, Alashraf A, Shakoor RA (2021) Effect of silicon nitride and graphene nanoplatelets on the properties of aluminum metal matrix composites. Materials 14(8):1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1408189810.3390/ma14081898 ↗
25. Prashantha Kumar HG, Anthony Xavior M (2014) Graphene reinforced metal matrix composite (GRMMC): a review. Procedia Eng 97:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.38110.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.381 ↗
26. Ahmad SI, Hamoudi H, Abdala A, Ghouri ZK, Youssef KM (2020) Graphene-reinforced bulk metal matrix composites: synthesis, microstructure, and properties. Rev Adv Mater Sci 59(1):67–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2020-000710.1515/rams-2020-0007 ↗
27. Sardar S, Karmakar SK, Das D (2017) Ultrasonic assisted fabrication of magnesium matrix composites: a review. Mater Today Proc 4(2):3280–3289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.21410.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.214 ↗
28. Rao TB (2021) Microstructural, mechanical, and wear properties characterization and strengthening mechanisms of Al7075/SiCnp composites processed through ultrasonic cavitation assisted stir-casting. Mater Sci Eng A 805:140553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14055310.1016/j.msea.2020.140553 ↗
29. Huang K, Jiang R, Li X, Zhang L, Li Z, Li R (2019) Effects of high-intensity ultrasound on microstructure and mechanical property of In situ TiB2/2A14 composites. Metals 9(11):1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/met911121010.3390/met9111210 ↗
30. Zhang B, Chen T (2019) Study of ultrasonic dispersion of graphene nanoplatelets. Materials 12(11):1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1211175710.3390/ma12111757 ↗
31. Ragupathy K, Velmurugan C, Ebenezer Jacob Dhas DS, Senthilkumar N, Leo Dev Wins K (2021) Prediction of dry sliding wear response of AlMg1SiCu/silicon carbide/molybdenum disulphide hybrid composites using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and response surface methodology (RSM). Arab J Sci Eng 46:12045–12063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05820-310.1007/s13369-021-05820-3 ↗
32. Thirumalvalavan S, Senthilkumar N, Perumal G, AnanthaPadmanaban MR (2022) Ameliorating the wear defiance of HVOF thermal spray silicon carbide coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy using PCA-GRA technique. Silicon 14:3101–3117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01706-710.1007/s12633-022-01706-7 ↗
33. Qian L, Chen L, Jiang L (2017) Wear measurement, friction, lubrication, and wear technology. In: Totten GE (ed) ASM handbook, vol 18. ASM International, pp 225–232. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a000638710.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006387 ↗
34. Gajalakshmi K, Senthilkumar N, Prabu B (2019) Multi-response optimization of dry sliding wear parameters of AA6026 using hybrid grey relational analysis coupled with response surface method. Meas Control 52:540–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/002029401984260310.1177/0020294019842603 ↗
35. Montgomery DC (2019) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley
36. Das D, Selvamuthu D (2018) Introduction to statistical methods, design of experiments and statistical quality control. Springer Singapore
37. Blokdyk G (2018) Response surface methodology, 2nd edn. Emereo Pty Limited
38. Azhagiri P, Senthilkumar N, Palanikumar K, Deepanraj B (2023) Mechanical properties evaluation on hybrid AA6026 composites added with nanoclay and carbon fibers. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00464-910.1007/s42823-023-00464-9 ↗
39. Freeman L, Montgomery DC, Rigdon SE, Pan R (2022) Design of experiments for reliability achievement. Wiley
40. Chopra S, Dhiman G, Sharma A, Shabaz M, Shukla P, Arora M (2021) Taxonomy of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in modern engineering sciences. Comput Intell Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/645559210.1155/2021/6455592 ↗
41. Lamba VK (2008) Neuro fuzzy systems. Laxmi Publications Pvt Limited
42. Nedjah N, MacedoMourelle LD (2005) Fuzzy systems engineering: theory and practice. Springer10.1007/b102051 ↗
43. Dhinakarraj CK, Senthilkumar N, Palanikumar K, Deepanraj B (2023) Experimental interrogations on morphologies and mechanical delineation of silicon nitride fortified Mg-Al-Zn alloy composites. Mater Today Commun 35:105731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10573110.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105731 ↗
44. Avcu E, Cao H, Zhang X, Guo Y, Withers PJ, Li X, Wang N, Yan S, Xiao P (2022) The effect of reduced graphene oxide content on the microstructural and mechanical properties of copper metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 856:143921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14392110.1016/j.msea.2022.143921 ↗
45. Leng J, Dong Y, Ren B, Wang R, Teng X (2020) Effects of graphene nanoplates on the mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanism of 7075Al alloy. Materials 13(24):580810.3390/ma13245808 ↗
46. Dzierwa A, Pawlus P (2021) Wear of a rough disc in dry sliding contact with a smooth ball: experiment and modeling. Arch Civ Mech Eng 21:85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00240-410.1007/s43452-021-00240-4 ↗
47. Velavan K, Palanikumar K, Senthilkumar N (2021) Experimental investigation of sliding wear behaviour of boron carbide and mica reinforced aluminium alloy hybrid metal matrix composites using Box-Behnken design. Mater Today Proc 44(5):3803–3810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.33310.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.333 ↗
48. Sharma P, Sharma S, Khanduja D (2015) Parametric study of dry sliding wear behavior of hybrid metal matrix composite produced by a novel process. Metall Mater Trans A 46:3260–3270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-2881-910.1007/s11661-015-2881-9 ↗
49. Ananth S, Sivaprakasam P, Udaya Prakash J, Ravi B, Kalusuraman G, Sundarakannan R (2022) Tribological characteristics of GCI-EN31 steel surface contact with dry sliding condition. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/647878110.1155/2022/6478781 ↗
50. Ji Z, Zhang L, Xie G, Xu W, Guo D, Luo J (2020) Mechanical and tribological properties of nanocomposites incorporated with two-dimensional materials. Friction 8(5):813–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0401-410.1007/s40544-020-0401-4 ↗
51. Subramanian K, Murugesan S, Mohan DG, Tomków J (2021) Study on dry sliding wear and friction behaviour of Al7068/Si3N4/BN hybrid composites. Materials 14(21):6560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1421656010.3390/ma14216560 ↗
52. Peck EA, Vining GG, Montgomery DC (2021) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley
53. Montgomery DC (2020) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley
54. Anderson MJ, Whitcomb PJ (2016) RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis10.1201/9781315382326 ↗
55. NiteshVashishtha SG (2017) Sapate, abrasive wear maps for high velocity oxy fuel (HVOF) sprayed WC-12Co and Cr3C2−25NiCr coatings. Tribol Int 114:290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.03710.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.037 ↗
56. Wu CFJ, Hamada MS (2011) Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization. Wiley
57. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley
58. Idusuyi N, Olayinka JI (2019) Dry sliding wear characteristics of aluminium metal matrix composites: a brief overview. J Mater Res Technol 8(3):3338–3346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.01710.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.017 ↗
59. Bhattacharya S, Das PP, Chatterjee P, Chakraborty S (2021) Prediction of responses in a sustainable dry turning operation: a comparative analysis. Math Problems Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/996797010.1155/2021/9967970 ↗
60. Mala D, Senthilkumar N, Deepanraj B, Tamizharasan T (2021) ANFIS-based prediction of MRR and surface roughness in electrical discharge machining of HAMMC. Green materials and advanced manufacturing technology: concepts and application, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, pp 75–93
61. Raharja MA, Darmawan IDMBA, Nilakusumawati DPE, Supriana IW (2021) Analysis of membership function in implementation of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) method for inflation prediction. J Phys 1722:012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/01200510.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012005 ↗
62. Dedeakayoğulları H, Kaçal A, Keser K (2022) Modeling and prediction of surface roughness at the drilling of SLM-Ti6Al4V parts manufactured with pre-hole with optimized ANN and ANFIS. Measurement 203:112029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11202910.1016/j.measurement.2022.112029 ↗