journal article·2022-05

Study on fractal model of activated carbon for pore formation

Junzhe Wang, Anning Zhou, Guoyang Liu, Zongxing Song, Chao Ma, Dan Wang

Carbon Letters· Volume 32· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In view of the activated carbon pore-forming mechanism, the fractal hypothesis of pore interior growth was proposed by optimizing the structure of Sierpinski sponge. Based on the hypothesis and the definition of fractal dimension, the function relationship between the reaction degree, reaction step length, specific surface area and pore volume was deduced, and the pore fractal growth model of activated carbon activation process was established. Semi-coke, apple charcoal and lychee charcoal were used to prepare activated carbon. The pore size distributions of the activated carbons are in accordance with the fractal growth hypothesis. Further, the reaction degree and reaction step length can be determined by the experimental data of pore and surface structure, which verified the feasibility of the pore fractal growth model.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Coal Properties and Utilization · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Kyotani T (2000) Control of pore structure in carbon. Carbon 38:269–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00142-610.1016/S0008-6223(99)00142-6 ↗
2. Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Gaspar CMTB (2003) Micropore size distribution of activated carbons impregnated after carbonization. J Porous Mater 10:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102403451766510.1023/A:1024034517665 ↗
3. Lee SM, Lee JH, Nam G, Kim SH, Kim J, Roh JS (2019) Surface shape and pore size change in carbon blacks isothermally oxidized in air atmosphere according to burn-off ratio. Carbon Lett 29:613–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00061-910.1007/s42823-019-00061-9 ↗
4. Chen X, Ong WJ, Kong Z, Zhao X, Li N (2020) Probing the active sites of site-specific nitrogen doping in metal-free graphdiyne for electrochemical oxygen reduction reactions. Sci Bull 65:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.10.01610.1016/j.scib.2019.10.016 ↗
5. Jiang J, Zou Y, Li F, Wang J, Zou J, Li N (2021) Intercalation engineering of MXenes towards highly efficient photo (electrocatalytic) hydrogen evolution reactions. J Mater Chem A 9:24195–24214. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA07332J10.1039/D1TA07332J ↗
6. Jiang J, Li N, Zou J, Zhou X, Eda G, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Li L, Zhai T, Wee AT (2019) Synergistic additive-mediated CVD growth and chemical modification of 2D materials. Chem Soc Rev 48:4639–4654. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00348G10.1039/C9CS00348G ↗
7. Mandelbrot BB (1999) Fractal: form, chance and dimension. World Publishing Corporation, Beijing, pp 51–53
8. Peng L, Chen B (2021) Fractal-based models study of the relative hydraulic conductivity and SWCC of bentonite by synchrotron radiation SAXS and X-ray computed tomography. Fractals 29:2150208. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X2150208X10.1142/S0218348X2150208X ↗
9. Bushell GC, Yan YD, Woodfield D, Raper JUDY, Amal ROSE (2002) On techniques for the measurement of the mass fractal dimension of aggregates. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 95:1–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(00)00078-610.1016/S0001-8686(00)00078-6 ↗
10. Avnir D, Jaroniec M (1989) An isotherm equation for adsorption on fractal surfaces of heterogeneous porous materials. Langmuir 5:1431–1433. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00090a03210.1021/la00090a032 ↗
11. Wang L, Jin M, Wu Y, Zhou Y, Tang S (2021) Hydration, shrinkage, pore structure and fractal dimension of silica fume modified low heat Portland cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater 272:121952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12195210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121952 ↗
12. Gauden PA, Terzyk AP, Rychlicki G (2001) The new correlation between microporosity of strictly microporous activated carbons and fractal dimension on the basis of the Polanyi–Dubinin theory of adsorption. Carbon 39:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00122-610.1016/S0008-6223(00)00122-6 ↗
13. Chen X, Zhou J, Ding N (2015) Fractal characterization of pore system evolution in cementitious materials. KSCE J Civ Eng 19:719–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0320-210.1007/s12205-013-0320-2 ↗
14. Kano F, Abe I, Kamaya H, Ueda I (2000) Fractal model for adsorption on activated carbon surfaces: Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption. Surf Sci 467:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00730-510.1016/S0039-6028(00)00730-5 ↗
15. Wang B, Li B, Li J, Gao Z, Xu J, Ren C, Zhang Y (2021) Measurement and modeling of coal adsorption-permeability based on the fractal method. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 88:103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.10382410.1016/j.jngse.2021.103824 ↗
16. Ren A, Wang Q, Guo B (2006) Structure characterization and surface fractal analysis of sludge activated carbon. Acta Chim Sin 64:1068–1072
17. Hu Q, Liu Y, Feng C, Zhang Z, Lei Z, Shimizu K (2018) Predicting equilibrium time by adsorption kinetic equations and modifying Langmuir isotherm by fractal-like approach. J Mol Liq 268:728–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.11310.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.113 ↗
18. Passe-Coutrin N, Altenor S, Cossement D, Jean-Marius C, Gaspard S (2008) Comparison of parameters calculated from the BET and Freundlich isotherms obtained by nitrogen adsorption on activated carbons: a new method for calculating the specific surface area. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 111:517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.03210.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.032 ↗
19. Wang F, Yang K, You J, Lei X (2019) Analysis of pore size distribution and fractal dimension in tight sandstone with mercury intrusion porosimetry. Results Phys 13:102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10228310.1016/j.rinp.2019.102283 ↗
20. Li K (2010) Analytical derivation of Brooks–Corey type capillary pressure models using fractal geometry and evaluation of rock heterogeneity. J Pet Sci Eng 73:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.00210.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.002 ↗
21. Liu Z, Li R, Yang H, Tian F, Zhu D (2021) A new fractal model of coal permeability based on the increasing fractal construction method of the Menger Sponge. Fractals 29:2150187–2150333. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X2150187510.1142/S0218348X21501875 ↗
22. Zhang S, Tang S, Tang D, Huang W, Pan Z (2014) Determining fractal dimensions of coal pores by FHH model: problems and effects. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 21:929–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.01810.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.018 ↗
23. Li A, Ding W, He J, Dai P, Yin S, Xie F (2016) Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs: a case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi formation in Malong block of eastern Yunnan Province, South China. Mar Pet Geol 70:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.00410.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.004 ↗
24. Mahamud MM, García V (2018) Textural characterization of chars using fractal analysis of N2 and CO2 adsorption. Fuel Process Technol 169:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.01310.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.013 ↗
25. Girgis BS, Soliman AM, Fathy NA (2011) Development of micro-mesoporous carbons from several seed hulls under varying conditions of activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 142:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.04410.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.044 ↗
26. Wang D, Yang H, Wu Y, Zhao C, Ju F, Wang X, Zhang S, Chen H (2020) Evolution of pore structure and fractal characteristics of coal char during coal gasification. J Energy Inst 93:1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2020.04.01510.1016/j.joei.2020.04.015 ↗
27. Yao Y, Liu D, Tang D, Tang S, Huang W (2008) Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from North China: an investigation on CH4 adsorption capacity of coals. J Coal Geol 73:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2007.07.00310.1016/j.coal.2007.07.003 ↗
28. Mahamud MM (2006) Textural characterization of active carbons using fractal analysis. Fuel Process Technol 87:907–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.00610.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.006 ↗
29. Fan X, Wang G, Li Y, Dai Q, Linghu S, Duan C, Zhang C, Zhang F (2019) Pore structure evaluation of tight reservoirs in the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sediments using fractal analysis of NMR experiments and logs. Mar Pet Geol 109:484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.03810.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.038 ↗
30. Song W, Wang D, Yao J, Li Y, Sun H, Yang Y, Zhang L (2019) Multiscale image-based fractal characteristic of shale pore structure with implication to accurate prediction of gas permeability. Fuel 241:522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.06210.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.062 ↗
31. Xia Y, Cai J, Wei W, Hu X, Wang X, Ge X (2018) A new method for calculating fractal dimensions of porous media based on pore size distribution. Fractals 26:1850006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X1850006810.1142/S0218348X18500068 ↗
32. Pan J, Wang K, Hou Q, Niu Q, Wang H, Ji Z (2016) Micro-pores and fractures of coals analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and fractal theory. Fuel 164:277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.01110.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.011 ↗
33. Yu S, Bo J, Fengli L, Jiegang L (2017) Structure and fractal characteristic of micro-and meso-pores in low, middle-rank tectonic deformed coals by CO2 and N2 adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 253:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.00910.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.009 ↗
34. Ma X, Wang L, Wan M, Deng T (2002) Fractal model of building blocks for structure of particles. Chin J Process Eng 2:385–391
35. Zhao M, Qing H, Wang Y, Liang J, Zhao M, Geng Y, Liang J, Lu B (2021) Superelastic behaviors of additively manufactured porous NiTi shape memory alloys designed with Menger sponge-like fractal structures. Mater Des 200:109448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10944810.1016/j.matdes.2021.109448 ↗
36. Vita MC, De Bartolo S, Fallico C, Veltri M (2012) Usage of infinitesimals in the Menger’s Sponge model of porosity. Appl Math Comput 218:8187–8195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.01310.1016/j.amc.2011.06.013 ↗
37. Zhang J (2005) Fractal. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing