journal article·2023-01-27Open access

Laser-Patterned Porous Carbon/ZnO Nanostructure Composites for Selective Room-Temperature Sensing of Volatile Organic Compounds

Huize Wang, Pablo Jiménez-Calvo, Marco Hepp, Mark Andrew Isaacs, Charles Otieno Ogolla, Ines Below-Lutz, Benjamin Butz, Volker Strauss

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 2

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The development of mobile, noninvasive, and portable sensor technologies for diagnostics and emission control is highly demanded. For that purpose, laser carbonization is studied as a tool to produce responsive carbon materials from inexpensive organic precursors for the room-temperature selective detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) applicable in future sensor array-based devices. To increase the response of intrinsically low-responsive laser-patterned carbons (LP-C) to analytes in the gas phase, we tested carbonization in the presence of nanoscale ZnO precursors in primary inks. Following the addition of a zinc salt, Zn(NO 3 ) 2, a noticeable 43-fold increase in the sensor response (Δ R / R 0 = −21.5% toward 2.5% acetone) was achieved. This effect is explained by a significant increase in the measurable surface area up to ∼700 m 2 ·g –1 due to the carbothermic reduction supported by the in situ formation of ZnO nanoparticles. Varying Zn concentrations or the addition of as-prepared ZnO nanorods lead to different surface properties like the surface area, porosity, and polarity of LP-C. A predominant effect of the surface polarity on the selectivity toward different analytes of the sensors during physisorption, e.g., acetone vs toluene, was identified and tested. The best-performing LP-C sensors were finely characterized by transmission/scanning electron microscopies and X-ray photoelectron/energy-dispersive X-ray/Raman spectroscopies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Max Planck Institut für Kolloid- und Grenzflächenforschung, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476Potsdam, Germany

Micro- and Nanoanalytics Group, University of Siegen, 57076Siegen, Germany

Harwell XPS, Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratories, DidcotOX11 0FA, U.K.

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft · Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Overview of Volatile Organic Compounds, 2017.
2. 10.3390/environments401002110.3390/environments4010021 ↗
3. 10.3390/s1707152010.3390/s17071520 ↗
4. 10.3390/diagnostics801001210.3390/diagnostics8010012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13086710.1016/j.snb.2021.130867 ↗
6. Probert C. · J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. · 2009 · 18 · 337
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab67a610.1149/1945-7111/ab67a6 ↗
8. 10.3390/S1808261310.3390/S18082613 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41378-020-0161-310.1038/s41378-020-0161-3 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20200480510.1002/adma.202004805 ↗
11. https://smart-nanotubes.com/; date of access: December 06, 2022.
12. 10.1109/TIE.2022.319462910.1109/TIE.2022.3194629 ↗
13. 10.3390/s10030208810.3390/s100302088 ↗
14. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2018.06.04110.1016/J.MATDES.2018.06.041 ↗
15. 10.1039/D1EN00929J10.1039/D1EN00929J ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.03910.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.039 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20170060810.1002/adem.201700608 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.01310.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013 ↗
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab67a910.1149/1945-7111/ab67a9 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b1685910.1021/acsami.7b16859 ↗
21. 10.1002/aelm.20200046310.1002/aelm.202000463 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41528-020-0080-210.1038/s41528-020-0080-2 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0414910.1021/acsomega.9b04149 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23055810.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230558 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0094210.1021/acsaelm.0c00942 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12715010.1016/j.matlet.2019.127150 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e0020510.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00205 ↗
28. Watanabe A. · 2019 · 3810.1117/12.2507540 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8TC00457A10.1039/C8TC00457A ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12879010.1016/j.snb.2020.128790 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.6b0295210.1021/acsami.6b02952 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.01010.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.010 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0962210.1021/acsnano.8b09622 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20210406110.1002/adfm.202104061 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10951810.1016/j.matdes.2021.109518 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10424010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104240 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20140276810.1002/adfm.201402768 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41528-022-00136-010.1038/s41528-022-00136-0 ↗
39. 10.1039/D1TA09459A10.1039/D1TA09459A ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.01810.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.03010.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.030 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.09410.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.094 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00953-X10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00953-X ↗
44. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.05510.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.055 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2006.12.00210.1016/j.progsurf.2006.12.002 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.01210.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.012 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20220740610.1002/adfm.202207406 ↗
49. 10.1007/BF0270592610.1007/BF02705926 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02316-610.1016/S0039-6028(02)02316-6 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12393010.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123930 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14521110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145211 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11747810.1016/j.fuel.2020.117478 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.11711310.1016/j.envpol.2021.117113 ↗
55. 10.1080/00405000.2016.119174510.1080/00405000.2016.1191745 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.04710.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047 ↗
57. 10.1346/CCMN.1970.018040410.1346/CCMN.1970.0180404 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.micron.2013.08.00510.1016/j.micron.2013.08.005 ↗