A simple nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on coconut shell charcoal powder-coated nickel foil electrode
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, a simple nonenzymatic glucose sensor has been proposed based on coconut shell charcoal (CSC) modified nickel foil as working electrode in a three-electrode electrochemical cell. Charcoal was prepared by the pyrolysis of coconut shells. The most important advantages of coconut shells are cost-effectiveness and their abundance in nature. The morphology and phase of the CSC powder were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The electrochemical performance of the CSC powder coated Nickel foil electrode was investigated by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. The sensor shows a higher sensitivity of 2.992 mA cm−2 mM−1 in the linear range of 0.5–5.5 mM and slightly lower sensitivity of 1.1526 mA cm−2 mM−1 in the range of 7–18.5 mM glucose concentration with a detection limit of 0.2 mM. The anti-interference property of CSC powder also was investigated and found that the response of interfering species was less significant compared to glucose response. The proposed sensor offers good sensitivity, wide linear range, and a very low response to interfering biomolecules.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Toghill KE, Compton RG (2010) Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors: a perspective and an evaluation. Int J Electrochem Sci 5(9):1246–130110.1016/S1452-3981(23)15359-4 ↗
2. Morikawa MA, Kimizuka N, Yoshihara M, Endo T (2002) New colorimetric detection of glucose by means of electron-accepting indicators: ligand substitution of [Fe (acac) 3−n (phen) n] n+ complexes triggered by electron transfer from glucose oxidase. Chem A Eur J 8(24):5580–558410.1002/1521-3765(20021216)8:24<5580::AID-CHEM5580>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
3. Manoj B, Raj AM, Thomas GC (2018) Tailoring of low grade coal to fluorescent nanocarbon structures and their potential as a glucose sensor. Sci Rep 8(1):1389110.1038/s41598-018-30026-3 ↗
4. Hsieh HV, Pfeiffer ZA, Amiss TJ, Sherman DB, Pitner JB (2004) Direct detection of glucose by surface plasmon resonance with bacterial glucose/galactose-binding protein. Biosens Bioelectron 19(7):653–66010.1016/S0956-5663(03)00271-9 ↗
5. Lundsgaard-Nielsen SM, Pors A, Banke SO, Henriksen JE, Hepp DK, Weber A (2018) Critical-depth Raman spectroscopy enables home-use non-invasive glucose monitoring. PLoS ONE 13(5):e019713410.1371/journal.pone.0197134 ↗
6. Vilian AE, Chen S-M, Ali MA, Al-Hemaid FM (2014) Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase immobilized on ZrO2 nanoparticles-decorated reduced graphene oxide sheets for a glucose biosensor. RSC Adv 4(57):30358–3036710.1039/C4RA04350B ↗
7. Vilian AE, Mani V, Chen S-M, Dinesh B, Huang S-T (2014) The immobilization of glucose oxidase at manganese dioxide particles-decorated reduced graphene oxide sheets for the fabrication of a glucose biosensor. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(40):15582–1558910.1021/ie502430d ↗
8. Vilian AE, Dinesh B, Rethinasabapathy M, Hwang S-K, Jin C-S, Huh YS, Han Y-K (2018) Hexagonal Co3O4 anchored reduced graphene oxide sheets for high-performance supercapacitors and non-enzymatic glucose sensing. J Mater Chem A 6(29):14367–1437910.1039/C8TA04941F ↗
9. Sun KG, Hur SH (2015) Highly sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Pt nanoparticle decorated graphene oxide hydrogel. Sens Actuators B Chem 210:618–62310.1016/j.snb.2014.11.143 ↗
10. Yang J, Lin Q, Yin W, Jiang T, Zhao D, Jiang L (2017) A novel nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on functionalized PDDA-graphene/CuO nanocomposites. Sens Actuators B Chem 253:1087–109510.1016/j.snb.2017.07.008 ↗
11. Ye J-S, Wen Y, De Zhang W, Gan LM, Xu GQ, Sheu F-S (2004) Nonenzymatic glucose detection using multi-walled carbon nanotube electrodes. Electrochem Commun 6(1):66–7010.1016/j.elecom.2003.10.013 ↗
12. Zhu Z, Garcia-Gancedo L, Flewitt AJ, Xie H, Moussy F, Milne WI (2012) A critical review of glucose biosensors based on carbon nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes and graphene. Sensors 12(5):5996–602210.3390/s120505996 ↗
13. Hwang D-W, Lee S, Seo M, Chung TD (2018) Recent advances in electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors—a review. Anal Chim Acta 1033:1–3410.1016/j.aca.2018.05.051 ↗
14. Qiao N, Zheng J (2012) Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on glassy carbon electrode modified with a nanocomposite composed of nickel hydroxide and graphene. Microchim Acta 177(1–2):103–10910.1007/s00604-011-0756-3 ↗
15. Koskun Y, Şavk A, Şen B, Şen F (2018) Highly sensitive glucose sensor based on monodisperse palladium nickel/activated carbon nanocomposites. Anal Chim Acta 1010:37–4310.1016/j.aca.2018.01.035 ↗
16. Pulidindi IN, Gedanken A (2014) Carbon nanoparticles based non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Int J Environ Anal Chem 94(1):28–3510.1080/03067319.2013.782488 ↗
17. Rahman HA, Chin SX (2019) Physical and chemical properties of the rice straw activated carbon produced from carbonization and KOH activation processes. Sains Malays 48(2):385–39110.17576/jsm-2019-4802-16 ↗
18. Sreńscek-Nazzal J, Kamińska W, Michalkiewicz B, Koren ZC (2013) Production, characterization and methane storage potential of KOH-activated carbon from sugarcane molasses. Ind Crops Prod 47:153–15910.1016/j.indcrop.2013.03.004 ↗
19. Tang Y-b, Liu Q, Chen F-Y (2012) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from waste ramulus mori. Chem Eng J 203:19–2410.1016/j.cej.2012.07.007 ↗
20. Singh C, Quested T, Boothroyd CB, Thomas P, Kinloch IA, Abou-Kandil AI, Windle AH (2002) Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanofibers produced by the floating catalyst method. J Phys Chem B 106(42):10915–1092210.1021/jp026159a ↗
21. Polarz S, Smarsly B, Schattka JH (2002) Hierachical porous carbon structures from cellulose acetate fibers. Chem Mater 14(7):2940–294510.1021/cm011271r ↗
22. Zhang F, Ma H, Chen J, Li G-D, Zhang Y, Chen J-S (2008) Preparation and gas storage of high surface area microporous carbon derived from biomass source cornstalks. Biores Technol 99(11):4803–480810.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.052 ↗
23. Shu J, Cheng S, Xia H, Zhang L, Peng J, Li C, Zhang S (2017) Copper loaded on activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for removal of methylene blue. RSC Adv 7(24):14395–1440510.1039/C7RA00287D ↗
24. Kayiran SB, Lamari FD, Levesque D (2004) Adsorption properties and structural characterization of activated carbons and nanocarbons. J Phys Chem B 108(39):15211–1521510.1021/jp048169c ↗
25. Yogesh GK, Shuaib E, Roopmani P, Gumpu MB, Krishnan UM, Sastikumar D (2019) Fluorescent carbon nanoparticles from laser-ablated Bougainvillea alba flower extract for bioimaging applications. Appl Phys A 125(6):37910.1007/s00339-019-2673-y ↗
26. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J (2010) Barley husk and coconut shell reinforced polypropylene composites: the effect of fibre physical, chemical and surface properties. Compos Sci Technol 70(5):840–84610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.022 ↗
27. Tian K, Prestgard M, Tiwari A (2014) A review of recent advances in nonenzymatic glucose sensors. Mater Sci Eng, C 41:100–11810.1016/j.msec.2014.04.013 ↗
28. Luo L, Li F, Zhu L, Ding Y, Zhang Z, Deng D, Lu B (2013) Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on nickel (II) oxide/ordered mesoporous carbon modified glassy carbon electrode. Colloids Surf B 102:307–31110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.08.003 ↗