journal article·2020-04-24

Nanogap Sensors Decorated with SnO2 Nanoparticles Enable Low-Temperature Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds

Luca Francioso, Chiara De Pascali, Pasquale Creti, Antonio V. Radogna, Simonetta Capone, Antonietta Taurino, Mauro Epifani, Chiara Baldacchini, Anna R. Bizzarri, Pietro A. Siciliano

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 3· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, an experiment was carried out in order to exploit the physical properties of an electrode structure with nanometric gap to enable the operation of MOX sensors at low temperature independently from the gas sensing properties of the adopted active material. The 100 nm-gap fingers gas sensor array was fabricated by using electron beam and UV optical lithography onto 4″ silicon wafers (guaranteeing high process yield). SnO2 nanoparticles (NPs) synthesized by sol–gel/solvothermal method were trapped between the nanogap electrodes by dielectrophoresis, and scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy surface analysis were used to investigate the semiconducting NPs dispersion between the nanogap fingers. Nanogap SnO2 NPs based-sensor responses to acetone and ethanol in dry air carrier gas at near room temperatures were reported, discussed, and compared with those obtained from 5 μm gap gas sensors (comparable to standard microgap commonly used in commercial sensors) functionalized with the same sensing material. The nanogap sensors exhibited better performance compared to the microgap ones, and larger response to ethanol than to acetone. For the lowest investigated gas concentration (10 ppm), the ethanol response (Rair/Rgas) increased with temperature from 2.56 at 50 °C to 17.91 to 100 °C, respectively from 1.56 to 3.92 for acetone. The best nanogap sensor responses were found at 100 °C with Rair/Rgas ≈ 38 for 150 ppm of ethanol, and Rair/Rgas ≈ 10 for 150 ppm of acetone. The experimental measurements confirmed the adopted theoretical model correlation between the sensor responses and the electrodes separation gap.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems, CNR-IMM, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Biophysics and Nanoscience Centre, DEB, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Largo dell’Università, 01100 Viterbo, Italy

Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems, CNR-IRET, Via Marconi 2, 05010 Porano, Italy

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.snb.2005.11.00610.1016/j.snb.2005.11.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.snb.2006.12.02910.1016/j.snb.2006.12.029 ↗
3. 10.3390/chemosensors301000110.3390/chemosensors3010001 ↗
4. 10.3390/s12030261010.3390/s120302610 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00695-510.1016/S0925-4005(01)00695-5 ↗
6. Briand D. · 2013 · 22010.1533/9780857098665.2.220 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.04.02010.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.04.020 ↗
8. 10.1088/0957-0233/19/5/05520510.1088/0957-0233/19/5/055205 ↗
9. 10.3390/environments401002010.3390/environments4010020 ↗
10. 10.1155/2009/71631610.1155/2009/716316 ↗
11. 10.3390/s1802033910.3390/s18020339 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.13110.1016/j.snb.2016.02.131 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0103810.1021/acsanm.9b01038 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0062710.1021/acsanm.8b00627 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0197510.1021/acsanm.8b01975 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.00310.1016/j.snb.2014.10.003 ↗
17. Capone S. · 2004 · 3 · 769
18. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.285785110.1109/JSEN.2018.2857851 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/9/09530210.1088/0957-4484/23/9/095302 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep3506610.1038/srep35066 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.324345810.1063/1.3243458 ↗
22. 10.1039/C7RA09441H10.1039/C7RA09441H ↗
23. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70201-710.1016/S1369-7021(10)70201-7 ↗
24. 10.1541/ieejsmas.126.57310.1541/ieejsmas.126.573 ↗
25. Bârsan N. · 2013 · 3510.1533/9780857098665.1.35 ↗
26. 10.1039/C5RA19388E10.1039/C5RA19388E ↗
27. 10.1007/s10854-019-01840-w10.1007/s10854-019-01840-w ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.08110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.081 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0230210.1021/acsanm.9b02302 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.343054210.1063/1.3430542 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0060610.1021/acsanm.9b00606 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10404-014-1446-310.1007/s10404-014-1446-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.06.00410.1016/j.pnsc.2013.06.004 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41378-018-0023-410.1038/s41378-018-0023-4 ↗
35. Kumar, S.; Shin, H.; Peng, Z.; Carson, C. G.; Wang, Z. L.; Gerhardt, R. A.; Hesketh, P. J. Dielectrophoretic Characterization of SnO2 Nanobelts. In TRANSDUCERS 2007 - 2007 International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference; June 10–14, 2007; IEEE: Lyon, France, 2007.10.1109/SENSOR.2007.4300317 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.497893010.1063/1.4978930 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.00910.1016/j.snb.2013.12.009 ↗
38. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0004110.1021/acssensors.6b00041 ↗
39. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.138-139.112110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.138-139.1121 ↗
40. 10.1002/ejic.20070094610.1002/ejic.200700946 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00339-017-1309-310.1007/s00339-017-1309-3 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗
43. 10.1021/la048235210.1021/la0482352 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.01110.1016/j.snb.2013.07.011 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20160156210.1002/adfm.201601562 ↗
46. 10.3762/bjnano.7.16410.3762/bjnano.7.164 ↗
47. 10.3390/s15112808810.3390/s151128088 ↗
48. 10.1021/cr400625j10.1021/cr400625j ↗
49. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0047910.1021/acsomega.7b00479 ↗