Construction of a Carbon Nanomaterial-Based Nanocomposite Aerogel for the Removal of Organic Compounds from Water
Source abstract
Abstract
Overutilization of organic-based compounds (e.g., fertilizers) in agricultural settings continues to cause concern due to potential adverse impacts on the health of humans and the environment. Adsorbents, such as activated carbon, are widely used due to their ability to adsorb various contaminants. Limitations in the effectiveness of activated carbon, where high uptake capacities are desired, require the need for alternatives to current state-of-the-art adsorbents. In this work, the adsorption capability of a lightweight, carbon-based aerogel is presented. The aerogel is composed of 0 to 2 wt % mixture of both graphene nanoplatelets (GnP) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). Two organic compounds, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 1-pyrenebutyric acid (PBA), served as the contaminants of interest. Results show that the aerogel containing 0.2 wt % SWCNT-GnP achieved an uptake capacity of 0.22 mg of 2,4-D/mg of aerogel and 0.083 mg of PBA/mg of aerogel. Compared to activated carbon, from a kinetic standpoint, the aerogels produced in this work demonstrated 39-fold higher adsorption of 2,4-D and 5-fold higher adsorption of PBA, making them a viable candidate as a next generation adsorbent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Aerogels and thermal insulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, United States
School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
Funding
Office of the Vice President, Rochester Institute of Technology · Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Guo Y. · J. Environ. Health · 2011 · 73 · 22
2. 10.1039/c4nr01028k10.1039/c4nr01028k ↗
3. 10.1039/c3ta13968a10.1039/c3ta13968a ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.5b0497410.1021/acsami.5b04974 ↗
5. 10.1557/mrs.2012.27610.1557/mrs.2012.276 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.04210.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.042 ↗
7. 10.1039/C3EN00093A10.1039/C3EN00093A ↗
8. 10.1039/C5RA11167F10.1039/C5RA11167F ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.08310.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.083 ↗
10. Cussler E. L. · 200910.1017/CBO9780511805134 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0235010.1021/acs.iecr.5b02350 ↗
12. 10.1021/es801777n10.1021/es801777n ↗
13. 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00960-610.1016/S0009-2614(03)00960-6 ↗
14. 10.1006/jcis.1997.518810.1006/jcis.1997.5188 ↗
15. 10.1021/es101326j10.1021/es101326j ↗
16. 10.1021/es101326j10.1021/es101326j ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.08.03810.1016/j.jcis.2008.08.038 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp802102410.1021/jp8021024 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.11410.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.114 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.479040310.1063/1.4790403 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.09.00210.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.09.002 ↗
22. 10.1021/es101482810.1021/es1014828 ↗
23. 10.1021/es801412j10.1021/es801412j ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.11510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.115 ↗
25. 10.1021/cr100059s10.1021/cr100059s ↗
26. 10.1021/ie051106b10.1021/ie051106b ↗
27. 10.1016/j.susc.2009.09.01010.1016/j.susc.2009.09.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.08110.1016/j.cej.2010.10.081 ↗
29. 10.1021/es071230h10.1021/es071230h ↗
30. 10.1021/es052208w10.1021/es052208w ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.01910.1016/j.cej.2011.08.019 ↗
32. 10.1166/jnn.2011.479110.1166/jnn.2011.4791 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6EW00284F10.1039/C6EW00284F ↗