Development of microporous-activated carbons derived from two renewable precursors for CO2 capture
Source abstract
Abstract
Wood sawdust from an invasive arboreal species, Parkinsonia aculeata, and seeds from a tropical fruit of massive consumption, Pouteria sapota, were used as precursors for the development of activated carbons (ACs) directed to CO2 adsorption. Chemical activation employing KOH as activating agent and pre-established experimental conditions was applied. Main physicochemical properties of the ACs in relation to their CO2 adsorption performance were examined. The ACs developed from the wood sawdust and the seeds presented specific surfaces areas of 770 and 1000 m2 g−1, respectively, with their porosity development resulting essentially microporous (< 2 nm). They also showed a similar content of acidic surface groups, but basic functionalities of the former duplicated those of the latter. Maximum CO2 adsorbed at equilibrium (273 K and 100 kPa) was 5.0 mmol g−1 and 4.4 mmol g−1 for the samples derived from the sawdust and the seeds, respectively. On the other hand, CO2 adsorption capacities mimicking post-combustion conditions, as evaluated from thermogravimetric assays and breakthrough curves obtained in a packed-bed column, were approximately 1 mmol g−1, indicating a good CO2 adsorption performance for both ACs. Nevertheless, those derived from the wood sawdust with a notorious preeminence of micropores (~ 93%), narrower pore size distribution centered around 1 nm, and a higher content of basic functionalities than the ACs obtained from the seeds showed a relatively better performance. The CO2 removal capacity of the activated carbons was not noticeably affected after five CO2 adsorption–desorption cycles, with both samples almost keeping their initial CO2 adsorption capacity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. ICPP (2014) Climate change: mitigation of climate change, working group III contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report, ICPP, http://www.ipcc.ch/ . Accessed 12 June 2018
2. Serafin J, Narkiewicz U, Morawski A, Wróbel R, Michalkiewicz B (2017) Highly Microporous Activated carbons from biomass for CO2 capture and effective micropores at different conditions. J CO2 Util 18:73–7910.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.006 ↗
3. Tiwari D, Goel C, Bhunia H, Bajpai P (2017) Melamine-formaldehyde derived porous carbons for adsorption of CO2 capture. J Environ Manage 197:415–42710.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.013 ↗
4. Plaza M, Pevida C, Arias C, Fermoso J, Arenillas A, Rubiera F, Pis J (2008) Application of thermogravimetric analysis to the evaluation of aminated solid sorbents for CO2 capture. J Therm Anal Calorim 92:601–60610.1007/s10973-007-8493-x ↗
5. Cozma P, Ghinea C, Mamaliga I, Wukovits W, Friedl A, Gavrilescu M (2013) Environmental impact assessment of high pressure water scrubbing biogas upgrading technology. Clean Soil Air Water 41:917–92710.1002/clen.201200303 ↗
6. Zhang L, Yin Y, Li L, Wang F, Song Q, Zhao N, Xiao F, Wei W (2016) Numerical simulation of CO2 adsorption on K based sorbent. Energ Fuel 30:4283–429110.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02588 ↗
7. Hori K, Higuchi T, Aoki Y, Miyamoto M, Oumi Y, Yogo K, Uemiya S (2017) Effect of pore size, aminosilane density and aminosilane molecular length on CO2 adsorption performance in aminosilane modified mesoporous Silica. Micropor Mesopor Mat 246:158–16510.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.020 ↗
8. Nwaoha C, Supap T, Idem R, Saiwan C, Tontiwachwuthikul P, AL-Marri M, Benamor A (2017) Advancement and new perspectives of using formulated reactive amine blends for post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies. Petroleum 3:10–3610.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.002 ↗
9. Zhu X, Wang P, Peng C, Yang J, Yan X (2014) Activated carbon produced from paulownia sawdust for high-Performance CO2 sorbents. Chin Chem Lett 25:929–93210.1016/j.cclet.2014.03.039 ↗
10. Ammendola P, Raganati F, Chirone R (2017) CO2 adsorption on a fine activated carbon in a sound assisted fluidized bed: thermodynamics and kinetics. Chem Eng J 322:302–31310.1016/j.cej.2017.04.037 ↗
11. Seo SW, Choi YJ, Kim JH et al (2019) Micropore-structured activated carbon prepared by waste PET/petroleum-based pitch. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00028-w10.1007/s42823-019-00028-w ↗
12. Shen C, Yu J, Li P, Grande C, Rodrigues A (2011) Capture of CO2 from flue gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption using activated carbon beads. Adsorption 17:179–18810.1007/s10450-010-9298-y ↗
13. Dong X, Li Y, Li S, Wang Y, Zhu J (2017) Insight into the CO2 capturer derived from graphene/MgO composite. Clean Soil Air Water 45(9999):160075510.1002/clen.201600755 ↗
14. Moura P, Vilarrasa-Garcia E, Maia D, Bastos-Neto M, Ania C, Parra J, Azevedo D (2018) Assessing the potential of nanoporous carbon adsorbents from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to separate CO2 from flue gas. Adsortion 24:279–29110.1007/s10450-018-9943-4 ↗
15. Vargas D, Giraldo L, Silvestre-Albero J, Moreno-Piraján J (2011) CO2 adsorption on binderless activated carbon monoliths. Adsorption 17:497–50410.1007/s10450-010-9309-z ↗
16. Deng S, Wei H, Chen T, Wang B, Huang J, Yu G (2014) Superior CO2 adsorption on pine nut shell-derived activated carbons and the effective micropores at different temperatures. Chem Eng J 253:46–5410.1016/j.cej.2014.04.115 ↗
17. Banisheykholeslami F, Ghoreyshi A, Mohammadi M, Pirzadeh K (2015) Synthesis of a carbon molecular sieve from broom corn stalk via carbon deposition of methane for the selective separation of a CO2/CH4 Mixture. Clean – Soil. Air, Water 43:1084–109210.1002/clen.201400112 ↗
18. Song T, Liao J, Xiao J, Shen L (2015) Effect of micropore and mesopore structure on CO2 adsorption by activated carbons from biomass. New Carbon Mater 30:156–16610.1016/S1872-5805(15)60181-0 ↗
19. Nunell G, Fernández M, Bonelli P, Cukierman A (2016) Development and characterization of microwave-assisted activated carbons from Parkinsonia aculeata wood. Adsorption 22:347–35610.1007/s10450-016-9783-z ↗
20. Al-Janabi N, Vakili R, Kalumpasut P, Gorgojo P, Siperstein FR, Fan X, McCloskey P (2018) Velocity variation effect in fixed bed columns: a case study of CO2 capture using porous solid adsorbents. AIChE J 64:2189–219710.1002/aic.16135 ↗
21. Nunell G, Fernández M, Bonelli P, Cukierman A (2012) Conversion of biomass from an invasive species into activated carbons for removal of nitrate from wastewater. Biomass Bioenergy 44:87–9510.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.001 ↗
22. Deng H, Li G, Yang H, Tang J, Tang J (2010) Preparation of activated carbons from cotton stalk by microwave assisted KOH and K2CO3 activation. Chem Eng J 163:373–38110.1016/j.cej.2010.08.019 ↗
23. Ramos M, Bonelli P, Blacher S, Ribeiro Carrott M, Carrott P, Cukierman A (2011) Effect of the activating agent on physico-chemical and electrical properties of activated carbon cloths developed from a novel cellulosic precursor. Colloid Surface A 378:87–9310.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.02.005 ↗
24. Basso M, Cerrella E, Cukierman A (2002) Activated carbons developed from a rapidly renewable biosource for removal of cadmium (II) and nickel (II) ions from dilute aqueous solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:180–18910.1021/ie010664x ↗
25. Kacem M, Pellerano M, Delebarre A (2015) Pressure swing adsorption for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separation: comparison between activated carbons and zeolites performances. Fuel Process Technol 138:271–28310.1016/j.fuproc.2015.04.032 ↗
26. Nunell G, Fernández M, Bonelli P, Cukierman A (2015) Nitrate uptake from water by means of tailored adsorbents. Water Air Soil Poll 226:27810.1007/s11270-015-2546-8 ↗
27. Shafeeyan M, Daud W, Houshmand A, Shamiri A (2010) A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption. J Anal Appl Pyrol 89:143–15110.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006 ↗
28. Rouquerol J, Rouquerol F, Llewellyn P, Maurin G, Sing K (2014) Adsorption by powders and porous solids principles, methodology and applications, 2nd edn. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam
29. Jagiello J, Thommes M (2004) Comparison of DFT characterization methods based On N2, Ar, CO2, and H2 adsorption applied to carbons with various pore size distributions. Carbon 42:1227–123210.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.022 ↗
30. González A, Plaza M, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2013) Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 230:456–46510.1016/j.cej.2013.06.118 ↗
31. Wang R, Wang P, Yan X, Lang J, Peng C, Xue Q (2012) Promising porous carbon derived from celtuce leaves with outstanding supercapacitance and CO2 capture performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5800–580610.1021/am302077c ↗
32. Plaza MG, González AS, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2012) Valorisation of spent coffee grounds as CO2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications. Appl Energy 99:272–27910.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.028 ↗
33. Ello AS, de Souza LKC, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M (2013) Coconut shell-based microporous carbons for CO2 capture. Micropor Mesopor Mat 180:280–28310.1016/j.micromeso.2013.07.008 ↗
34. Travis W, Gadipelli S, Guo Z (2015) Superior CO2 adsorption from waste coffee ground derived carbons. RSC Adv 5:29558–2956210.1039/C4RA13026J ↗
35. Wang J, Heerwig A, Lohe MR, Oschatz M, Borchardt L, Kaskel S (2012) Fungi-based porous carbons for CO2 adsorption and separation. J Mater Chem 22:13911–1391310.1039/c2jm32139d ↗
36. Parshetti GK, Chowdhury S, Balasubramanian R (2015) Biomass derived low-cost microporous adsorbents for efficient CO2 capture. Fuel 148:246–25410.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.032 ↗
37. Vargas DP, Giraldo L, Erto A, Moreno-Piraján JC (2013) Chemical modification of activated carbon monoliths for CO2 adsorption. J Therm Anal Calorim 114:1039–104710.1007/s10973-013-3086-3 ↗
38. Deng S, Hu B, Chen T, Wang B, Huang J, Wang Y et al (2015) Activated carbons prepared from peanut shell and sunflower seed shell for high CO2 adsorption. Adsorption 21:125–13310.1007/s10450-015-9655-y ↗
39. Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2011) Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ Sci 4:1765–177110.1039/c0ee00784f ↗
40. Matabosch Coromina H, Walsh DA, Mokaya R (2016) Biomass-derived activated carbon with simultaneously enhanced CO2 uptake for both pre and post combustion capture applications. J Mater Chem A 4:280–28910.1039/C5TA09202G ↗
41. Landaverde-Alvarado C, Morris A, Martin S (2017) Gas sorption and kinetics of CO2 sorption and transport in a polymorphic microporous MOF with open Zn (II) coordination sites. J CO2 Util 19:40–4810.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.029 ↗
42. Loganathan S, Tikmani M, Edubilli S, Mishra A, Ghoshal AK (2014) CO2 adsorption kinetics on mesoporous silica under wide range of pressure and temperature. Chem Eng J 256:1–810.1016/j.cej.2014.06.091 ↗
43. Borna M, Pirsaheb M, Niri M, Mashizie R, Kakavandi B, Zare M, Asadi A (2016) Batch and column studies for the adsorption of chromium (VI) on low-cost Hibiscus cannabinus kenaf, a green adsorbent. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 68:80–8910.1016/j.jtice.2016.09.022 ↗
44. Cui X, Bustin R, Dipple G (2004) Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in Coal: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data. Fuel 83:293–30310.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001 ↗