journal article·2020-02-28

ZnO Nanostructured Interphase for Multifunctional and Lightweight Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials under Various Loading Conditions

Jalal Nasser, Kelsey Steinke, Henry Sodano

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 3· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The optimal mechanical performance of glass fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composites typically relies on the suitability of its interfacial properties to the applied loading conditions. The contrasting interfacial requirements for glass fiber composites in ballistic versus structural applications require multicomponent designs that lead to an increase in the system’s weight, cost, and complexity. Thus, interfacial modifications that yield a multifunctional composite performance are necessary to simultaneously yield maximal energy absorption under dynamic loading rates and high resistance to delamination under static loading rates. In this work, a zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructured interphase is grafted on the surface of glass fibers to enable the tuning of interfacial shear strength (IFSS) in glass fiber reinforced composites (GFRC) for optimal behavior across a large range of strain rates. The glass fibers are functionalized by using a treatment in piranha solution to increase the surface oxygen content and improve the adhesion between the fiber and the ZnO nanostructure. The ZnO nanowires displayed up to 96% improvement in average IFSS relative to untreated fibers at a quasi-static strain rate and a 68% decrease in IFFS compared to untreated fibers at strain rates greater than 2000 s–1. The enhanced average IFSS at static loading conditions is caused by the creation of a functional gradient at the glass fiber–epoxy matrix interface due to the ZnO nanowire interphase, while the decrease in interfacial properties at dynamic loading rates is the result of matrix stiffening, causing brittle fracture of the ceramic interphase. These results demonstrate the potential of integrating ZnO nanomaterials at the fiber–matrix interface to simultaneously introduce ballistic and structural functionality into fiberglass reinforced polymer matrix composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Funding

Army Research Office

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.009 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.007 ↗
3. 10.1177/1045389X0809738710.1177/1045389X08097387 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5EE03181H10.1039/C5EE03181H ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20180284610.1002/adfm.201802846 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.008 ↗
7. Walker, S. P.; Daryabeigi, K.; Samareh, J. A.; Wagner, R.; Waters, W. A Multifunctional Hot Structure Heat Shield Concept for Planetary Entry. In 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, 2015.10.2514/6.2015-3530 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.05910.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.059 ↗
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/02110.1088/0964-1726/13/5/021 ↗
10. NASA - Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Vol. I.
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.011 ↗
13. Bhatnagar A. · 2016
14. 10.1106/FR0L-T33W-JPD0-VFH310.1106/FR0L-T33W-JPD0-VFH3 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-001-0237-010.1007/s11661-001-0237-0 ↗
16. Vieille, B.; Casado, V. M.; Bouvet, C. Comparative Study on the Impact Behavior and Damage Tolerance of Woven Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic-and Thermosetting-Composites. In 15th European Conference on Composite Materials; Venice, 2012.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.025 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.011 ↗
18. Norris, R. G. Military Helmet Extension and Military Helmet Including the Extension, March 10, 2005.
19. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00064-110.1016/S0263-8223(99)00064-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00061-110.1016/S0143-7496(02)00061-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/0010-4361(89)90346-710.1016/0010-4361(89)90346-7 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219980177266155110.1177/002199801772661551 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.05310.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.053 ↗
25. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00109-A10.1016/0020-7683(94)00109-A ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.029 ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90123-X10.1016/0266-3538(93)90123-X ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.14910.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.149 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.010 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00052-010.1016/S0266-3538(02)00052-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.08810.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.088 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.01310.1016/j.msea.2007.06.013 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20090001110.1002/adfm.200900011 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.010 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.05710.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.057 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.474639810.1063/1.4746398 ↗
37. 10.1021/am506272c10.1021/am506272c ↗
38. 10.1080/09276440.2017.134179010.1080/09276440.2017.1341790 ↗
39. 10.1021/am302060v10.1021/am302060v ↗
40. 10.1021/am900376t10.1021/am900376t ↗
41. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00550-210.1016/S0021-9797(03)00550-2 ↗
42. Shokri, B.; Abbasi-Firouzjah, M.; Iman Hosseini, S. FTIR Analysis of Silicon Dioxide Thin Film Deposited by Metal Organic-Based PECVD. In 19th international symposium on plasma chemistry society; Bochum, 2009.
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.012 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.08410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.084 ↗
45. Giannopoulos, I. P.; Burgoyne, C. J. Viscoelasticity of Kevlar 49 Fibres. In 16th National Conference on Concrete Structure, 2009.
46. 10.1007/s11340-019-00502-610.1007/s11340-019-00502-6 ↗
47. 10.1002/admi.20150040410.1002/admi.201500404 ↗
48. 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90629-110.1016/0921-5093(89)90629-1 ↗
49. Goldberg, R. K.; Roberts, G. D. Strain Rate Sensitivity of Epoxy Resin in Tensile and Shear Loading, 2005.
50. 10.1007/s40870-016-0052-810.1007/s40870-016-0052-8 ↗
51. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/20/20550310.1088/0957-4484/18/20/205503 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.04.04610.1016/j.sna.2006.04.046 ↗
53. Nasser, J.; Lin, J.; Steinke, K.; Sodano, H. A. Adsorbed Aramid Nanofiber Interphase for Enhanced Aramid Fiber Reinforced Composites, 2019.10.2514/6.2019-1200 ↗