journal article·2016-04

Mid-infrared plasmonic tuning via nanogap control in periodic multilayer graphene nanoribbons

Jong-Kwon Lee, Heetae Kim

Optical Materials· Volume 54
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Plasmonic tuning at mid-infrared wavelength by regulating the nanogap between the adjacent multilayer graphene nanoribbons (GNs) is investigated with Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method. The 100-nm-wide multilayer GNs formed on a SiO 2 /p-Si show that plasmon resonance moves to longer wavelength by decreasing the nanogap from 100 nm to 5 nm, due to the inter-nanoribbon attractive interaction. Also, the resonance wavelength shifts are 7.0, 4.8 and 3.9–3.3 μm in this nanogap range for 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-layer GNs, respectively, at Fermi energy (E F ) of 0.2 eV, implying enhanced confinement in plasmonic oscillation as the number of graphene layer increases. Meanwhile, by shifting the E F from 0.2 eV to 0.4 eV, the resonance peaks for each multilayer GN move to shorter wavelengths, and the peak shifts in the same nanogap range are further decreased resulting from the increased charge carriers involved in the localized plasmonic oscillation. These observed results can provide an insight in designing mid-infrared plasmonic devices for advanced nano-photonic systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic and Optical Devices · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Westervelt · Science · 2008 · 320 · 32410.1126/science.1156936 ↗
2. Xia · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 71510.1021/nl9039636 ↗
3. Bonaccorso · Nat. Photon. · 2010 · 4 · 61110.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
4. Ju · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 63010.1038/nnano.2011.146 ↗
5. Wang · Science · 2008 · 320 · 20610.1126/science.1152793 ↗
6. Hwang · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 20541810.1103/PhysRevB.75.205418 ↗
7. Jablan · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 24543510.1103/PhysRevB.80.245435 ↗
8. Emani · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 520210.1021/nl302322t ↗
9. Grigorenko · Nat. Photon. · 2012 · 6 · 74910.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
10. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 15311110.1063/1.3702819 ↗
11. Bao · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 367710.1021/nn300989g ↗
12. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13110810.1063/1.4800931 ↗
13. Gao · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 780610.1021/nn301888e ↗
14. Cai · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 04310510.1063/1.4906996 ↗
15. Chu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 23110710.1063/1.4810003 ↗
16. Christensen · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 43110.1021/nn2037626 ↗
17. Koppens · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 337010.1021/nl201771h ↗
18. Hanson · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 06430210.1063/1.2891452 ↗
19. Casiraghi · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 271110.1021/nl071168m ↗
20. Nikitin · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 08140510.1103/PhysRevB.85.081405 ↗