Optical and structural characterization of annealed proton exchange waveguides in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO3
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, studies are presented on proton exchanged (PE) and annealed proton exchanged (APE) waveguides in Y-cut magnesium doped lithium niobate based on our systematic fabrication and characterizations. The analysis is focused on the optical and structural properties from the measurements of prism coupler, X-ray diffraction and infrared absorption. The evolution of the index profile with annealing is studied. Unlike the Gaussian index profile for the APE waveguides in pure LiNbO 3 , the index profile of APE waveguides in MgO:LiNbO 3 still keeps the characteristics of step-like profile though with a long index tail. From the measurement results of X-ray diffraction, the strain induced by proton exchange depends on the exchange condition in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO 3 . The lattice distortion in the guiding layer of an as-exchanged waveguide in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO 3 can be up to +0.73%, which can be restored to +0.20% by annealing for a short time. The proton exchange causes more serious non-uniformity of the strain in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO 3 than that in pure LiNbO 3 in our study. It was also found that HNbO 3 phase of high hydrogen concentration can be formed more easily in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO 3 by proton exchange from the analysis of 3300 cm −1 peak in the IR spectra. The intensity of the infrared absorption peak at 3500 cm −1 decreases and the broad peak at 3300 cm −1 disappears after annealing in Y-cut MgO:LiNbO 3 waveguides.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies · Solid State Laser Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Bryan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1984 · 44 · 84710.1063/1.94946 ↗
2. Shoji · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1997 · 14 · 226810.1364/JOSAB.14.002268 ↗
3. Sugita · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 · 2001 · 40 · 175110.1143/JJAP.40.1751 ↗
4. Zhang · J. Mod. Opt. · 2000 · 47 · 613
5. Digonnet · Opt. Lett. · 1985 · 10 · 23510.1364/OL.10.000235 ↗
6. Pun · Electron. Lett. · 1991 · 27 · 16810.1049/el:19910108 ↗
7. Canali · Proc. SPIE · 1984 · 460 · 4910.1117/12.939456 ↗
8. Korkishko · Proc. SPIE · 1997 · 2997 · 18810.1117/12.264149 ↗
9. Mukaide · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 385210.1063/1.1556570 ↗
10. Korkishko · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 116310.1063/1.1586464 ↗
11. Jakel · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1982 · 41 · 60710.1063/1.93615 ↗
12. Kuneva · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2000 · 3 · 58110.1016/S1369-8001(00)00088-3 ↗
13. White · Appl. Opt. · 1976 · 15 · 15110.1364/AO.15.000151 ↗
14. Nikolopoulos · IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. · 1991 · 9 · 86410.1109/50.85787 ↗
15. Goto · Appl. Opt. · 1989 · 28 · 6010.1364/AO.28.000060 ↗
16. Minakata · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 49 · 99210.1063/1.97468 ↗
17. Rice · Mater. Res. Bull. · 1984 · 19 · 59110.1016/0025-5408(84)90126-0 ↗
18. Loni · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 396410.1063/1.345006 ↗
19. Loni · IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. · 1989 · 7 · 91110.1109/50.32358 ↗
20. Ziling · J. Appl. Phys. · 1993 · 73 · 312510.1063/1.353002 ↗
21. Vohra · IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. · 1988 · 6 · 184810.1109/50.9254 ↗
22. Lee · J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 262910.1063/1.336965 ↗