journal article·2001-01

The possibility of tailoring the ne vs cLi relationship in lithium niobate optical waveguides

Jarmila Špirková-Hradilová, Pavla Nekvindová, Jiřı́ Vacı́k, Jarmila Červená, Josef Schröfel

Optical Materials· Volume 15· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We present results of our study of concentration profiles of lithium ( c Li ) in annealed proton exchanged (APE) waveguiding layers as measured by the neutron depth profiling (NDP) method. This non-destructive method, based on the 6 Li(n,α) 3 H reaction induced by thermal neutrons, allowed easy monitoring of c Li profiles in a large number of samples fabricated under various fabrication conditions. Our systematic study revealed that, though every particular waveguide could be characterised by very similar mirror-shaped extraordinary refractive index ( n e ) as well as c Li depth profiles, in contrast with up to now generally accepted opinion, there was no linear relationship which unambiguously attributed Δn e to Δc Li . The most important fabrication step appeared to be the post-exchange annealing, during which the lithium atoms were transported towards the sample surfaces. The annealing regime pre-destined not only the depth distribution of the lithium atoms but, as a consequence of it, also other properties of the waveguiding region. That knowledge allows us to fabricate the APE waveguides with a priori given properties for a wide range of special applications. We have also formulated the n e vs c Li semi-empirical relationship, which was proved to fit all our fabricated APE waveguides.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Jackel · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1982 · 41 · 60710.1063/1.93615 ↗
2. Canali · J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 264310.1063/1.336968 ↗
3. McWright Howerton · J. Quant. Electron. · 1991 · 77 · 59310.1109/3.81368 ↗
4. Richter · Phys. Stat. Sol. A · 1989 · 114 · 76510.1002/pssa.2211140241 ↗
5. Wilson · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 605510.1063/1.343584 ↗
6. Vohra · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 516110.1063/1.343751 ↗
7. Paz-Pujalt · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 76 · 398110.1063/1.358495 ↗
8. Zavada · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 269710.1063/1.358738 ↗
9. Korkishko · Appl. Opt. · 1996 · 35 · 705610.1364/AO.35.007056 ↗
10. Korkishko · Tech. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 21 · 752
11. Korkishko · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 101010.1063/1.365864 ↗
12. V. Sirotek, J. Hradilová, J. Schröfel, J. Čtyroký, in: PHOTONICS'95, Prague, 23–25 August 1995, in: European Optical Society Annual Meetings Digest Series, vol. 2A, p. 151
13. P. Kolářová, J. Hradilová, P. Novák, J. Schröfel, J. Vacı́k, J. Čtyroký, in: PHOTONICS'95, Prague, 23–25 August 1995, in: European Optical Society Annual Meetings Digest Series, vol. 2A, p. 190
14. White · Appl. Opt. · 1976 · 15 · 15110.1364/AO.15.000151 ↗
15. Vacı́k · Acta Phys. Hungarica · 1994 · 75 · 36910.1007/BF03156605 ↗
16. Kolářová · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1998 · 141 · 49810.1016/S0168-583X(98)00160-8 ↗
17. Kapphan · Phys. Stat. Sol. A · 1992 · 133 · 1510.1002/pssa.2211330117 ↗