journal article·2020-11

Growth of magnetic binary metal oxides on reduced graphene oxide sheets and its application as saturable absorber in mode-locked Tm/Ho Co-doped fiber laser

Harith Ahmad, Mohammad Mahdi Ariannejad, Rizal Ramli, Norazriena Yusoff, Muhamad Zharif Samion, Leonard Bayang

Optical Materials· Volume 109
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this work, a simple yet efficient method of growing magnetic binary metal oxides of CuO/Fe2O3 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets using the hydrothermal method was demonstrated. The rGO-CuO/Fe2O3 nanocomposite was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis. The nonlinear optical absorption characteristics of the rGO-CuO/Fe2O3 nanocomposite exhibited a modulation depth and saturation intensity of 12.5% and 1.0 kW/cm2, respectively. The rGO-CuO/Fe2O3 nanocomposite in the solution form were drop-casted onto a microfiber to form a saturable absorber (SA) which was then incorporated into a Thulium-Holmium (Tm/Ho) co-doped fiber laser (THDFL) cavity. The mode-locked output was generated at 1917 nm with pulse duration of 1.34 ps and repetition rate of 11.36 MHz. The obtained RF spectrum revealed that the mode-locked laser was stable with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of about 63 dB. This work demonstrated the capability of rGO-CuO/Fe2O3 nanocomposite as an SA to induce stable mode-locking in a THDF fiber laser cavity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Jin · Nanophotonics · 2020 · 1
2. Malinauskas · Light Sci. Appl. · 2016 · 510.1038/lsa.2016.133 ↗
3. Lubatschowski · 2003 · 113
4. Harun · Laser Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 8 · 44910.1002/lapl.201110015 ↗
5. Wang · APL Photonics · 2016 · 110.1063/1.4965249 ↗
6. Han · Progress Quantum Electron. · 2020 · 10026410.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100264 ↗
7. Ahmad · Opt. Fiber Technol. · 2018 · 45 · 12210.1016/j.yofte.2018.07.012 ↗
8. A femtosecond thulium holmium co-doped fiber laser based on graphene oxide evanescent filed interaction
9. Zhou · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2019 · 7 · 1121510.1039/C9TC03083B ↗
10. Ma · Optic Commun. · 2020 · 12597910.1016/j.optcom.2020.125979 ↗
11. Wang · Optic Laser. Technol. · 2020 · 128 · 10622810.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106228 ↗
12. Haris · Optic Laser. Technol. · 2017 · 88 · 12110.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.015 ↗
13. Al-Masoodi · Opt. Eng. · 2017 · 5610.1117/1.OE.56.5.056103 ↗
14. Hu · Optik · 2019 · 189 · 9710.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.071 ↗
15. Li · Optic Commun. · 2018 · 406 · 8010.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.007 ↗
16. Zuikafly · Results Phys. · 2018 · 9 · 37110.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.002 ↗
17. Luo · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 106610.1039/C5NR06981E ↗
18. Sadeq · Results Phys. · 2018 · 10 · 26410.1016/j.rinp.2018.06.006 ↗
19. Pang · Optic Laser. Technol. · 2019 · 113 · 37910.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.011 ↗
20. Ahmad · Infrared Phys. Technol. · 2018 · 93 · 9610.1016/j.infrared.2018.07.019 ↗
21. Ahmad · Infrared Phys. Technol. · 2019 · 97 · 14210.1016/j.infrared.2018.12.037 ↗
22. Ahmad · IEEE Photonics J. · 2015 · 8 · 110.1109/JPHOT.2015.2506169 ↗
23. Ando · Nature · 1995 · 374 · 62510.1038/374625a0 ↗
24. Zhou · J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 19 · 53910.1023/A:1008788606180 ↗
25. Boltaev · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 110.1038/s41598-019-47941-8 ↗
26. Shi · Optic Express · 2014 · 22 · 1937510.1364/OE.22.019375 ↗
27. Harun · Optik · 2013 · 124 · 53810.1016/j.ijleo.2011.12.054 ↗
28. Study evanescent-field penetration depth in tapered nano-fiber optics
29. Huang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2011 · 6 · 344310.2147/IJN.S26812 ↗
30. Huang · Sci. China Technol. Sci. · 2018 · 61 · 97110.1007/s11431-017-9221-3 ↗
31. Li · Optik · 2017 · 142 · 47010.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.029 ↗
32. Martinez · APL Photonics · 2017 · 2 · 12610310.1063/1.4996918 ↗
33. Bhosale · J. Mol. Catal. Chem. · 2015 · 404 · 810.1016/j.molcata.2015.04.002 ↗
34. Ethiraj · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2012 · 7 · 7010.1186/1556-276X-7-70 ↗
35. Wei · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 6614110.1039/C5RA08254D ↗
36. Sharifi · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 110.1038/ncomms3319 ↗
37. Fang · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 5602310.1039/C7RA12022B ↗
38. Yusoff · Microchimica Acta · 2017 · 184 · 329110.1007/s00604-017-2344-7 ↗
39. Yeap · J. Nanoparticle Res. · 2017 · 19 · 36810.1007/s11051-017-4065-6 ↗
40. Ahmad · Appl. Optic. · 2016 · 55 · 100110.1364/AO.55.001001 ↗
41. Ahmad · Appl. Optic. · 2018 · 57 · 693710.1364/AO.57.006937 ↗
42. Ahmad · Laser Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 16
43. Agrawal · 2001
44. Set · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2004 · 22 · 5110.1109/JLT.2003.822205 ↗