journal article·2015-04

Electro-optical properties of low viscosity driven holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals

K.R. Moon, S.Y. Bae, B.K. Kim

Optical Materials· Volume 42
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Relative diffraction efficiency (RDE), operating voltage, and response times are most important performance characteristics of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals (HPDLC). Two types of triallyl isocyanurate (TI) having different structures were incorporated into the conventional transmission grating of HPDLC. Premix viscosity decreased by 13–18% with up to 3% TI, beyond which it increased. TI eliminated induction period and augmented initial grating formation rate at all contents. Saturation RDE increased over 200% while threshold voltage and rise time decreased to about half and 2/3, respectively up to 3% TI, beyond which the tendencies were reversed. Among the two TIs, low viscosity monomer (TA) showed high RDE, while high miscibility monomer (TE) low characteristic voltages and short response times. It is concluded that grating formation is largely favored by low viscosity, while interface tensions and electro-optical performances by miscibility at similar viscosities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Qi · Display · 2004 · 25 · 17710.1016/j.displa.2004.09.009 ↗
2. Nalwa · 2001
3. Natarajan · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 247710.1021/cm021824d ↗
4. Kim · J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. · 2012 · 50 · 141810.1002/pola.25909 ↗
5. Nicoletta · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 99510.1002/adfm.200400403 ↗
6. Yamane · Polymer · 1999 · 40 · 477710.1016/S0032-3861(98)00712-5 ↗
7. Ryu · Eur. Polym. J. · 2007 · 43 · 212710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.02.033 ↗
8. Kim · Polym. Int. · 2008 · 57 · 62610.1002/pi.2386 ↗
9. Shin · Polym. Int. · 2005 · 54 · 92210.1002/pi.1790 ↗
10. Patnaik · Polymer · 1999 · 40 · 650710.1016/S0032-3861(98)00851-9 ↗
11. White · Polymer · 2007 · 48 · 597910.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.007 ↗
12. Klosterman · MRS Proc. · 1999 · 559 · 12910.1557/PROC-559-129 ↗
13. G.T. Warren, M. Desarker, J. Qi, G.P. Crawford. SID 01 DIGEST 32 (2001) pp. 866–869.
14. Kim · ChemPhysChem · 2006 · 11 · 200810.1002/cphc.200600272 ↗
15. Park · Polymer · 2003 · 44 · 159510.1016/S0032-3861(03)00005-3 ↗
16. Woo · ChemPhysChem · 2008 · 9 · 14110.1002/cphc.200700521 ↗
17. Natarajan · Polymer · 2006 · 47 · 441110.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.033 ↗
18. White · Macromolecules · 2007 · 40 · 112110.1021/ma061829m ↗
19. Asif · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 1106610.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.046 ↗
20. Yates · Eur. Polym. J. · 2004 · 40 · 125710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.02.007 ↗
21. Baird · 1998
22. Jang · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 1922610.1039/c1jm13827h ↗
23. Park · J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. · 2013 · 51 · 125510.1002/pola.26495 ↗
24. Zhou · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 2001 · 41 · 136510.1002/pen.10836 ↗
25. Mark · 1984
26. Solymer · 2004
27. Brandrup · 1999
28. Krevelen · 2009
29. Gill · J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. · 2003 · 41 · 20410.1002/pola.10566 ↗
30. Ahmad · Bull. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 35 · 22110.1007/s12034-012-0286-6 ↗
31. Sarkar · Macromolecules · 2003 · 36 · 63010.1021/ma020726a ↗
32. Kim · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2006 · 27 · 55310.1002/marc.200500784 ↗