journal article·2026-05-01Open access

Self-Assembly Interactions in Magnetite-Coated Cellulose Nanocrystals: Implications for Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications

Mohammad Jahid Hasan, Erin L. McNeill, Kishore Chand, Juganta K. Roy, Monishita Deb, Katherine Schlaak, Sydney Herzog, Yvonne Sun, Sarah Watzman, Esteban E. Ureña-Benavides, Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 9· Issue 17

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Magnetic cellulose nanocrystal (MCNC) nanocomposites are promising sustainable and biocompatible platforms for magnetic hyperthermia; however, the molecular mechanisms governing Fe 3 O 4 adsorption and deposition onto CNCs remain poorly understood. Here, sulfated (S-CNC) and TEMPO-oxidized CNCs (T-CNC) were used to prepare nanocomposites at 1:2 and 1:4 CNC:Fe 3 O 4 mass ratios, enabling a systematic evaluation of how surface chemistry and nanoparticle loading dictate interfacial interactions and magneto-colloidal behavior. Bare magnetite nanoparticles were 21 ± 5 nm by TEM but grew to 144 ± 18 in the DLS measurement at pH 7. The S-CNC nanocomposites had hydrodynamic sizes between 144 and 210 nm, not much larger than the 140 nm long CNC rods, suggesting an enhanced dispersion stability compared to Fe 3 O 4 alone. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy combined with density functional theory revealed that −OH and −COOH groups drive electrostatic adsorption with charge transfer from Fe 3 O 4 to the CNC surface, while T-CNCs showed more favorable adsorption energies and evidence of covalent Fe–O bonding. Vibrating sample magnetometry demonstrated superparamagnetic behavior for all samples, with S-CNC/Fe 3 O 4 1:4 and 1:2 displaying saturation magnetizations of 78 and 77 emu/g-Fe 3 O 4, close to the 83 emu/g of bare magnetite. The T-CNC composites showed lower (60 and 66 emu/g-Fe 3 O 4 ) saturation magnetizations. Zero-field-cooled/field-cooled measurements resulted in a blocking temperature of 112 K for all samples, except T-CNC/Fe 3 O 4 1:2 (100 K). Magnetic hyperthermia studies revealed that specific absorption rate (SAR) increased with field strength and Fe 3 O 4 content; however, S-CNC/Fe 3 O 4 (1:2) achieved the highest intrinsic SAR per gram of Fe 3 O 4 (649 W/g-Fe 3 O 4 ) likely due to its anisotropy and fast magnetic relaxation. Cytotoxicity assays confirmed that all nanocomposites were nontoxic toward mammalian cells. These results establish quantitative structure–property relationships between CNC surface chemistry, interfacial bonding mechanisms, and magnetic heating performance, providing a foundation for rational design of biocompatible magnetic nanocomposites for hyperthermia and related applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, Texas 78249, United States

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0256, United States

Department of Chemistry and Physics

West Texas A&M University

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, 2901Woodside Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, United States

Department of Biology

University of Dayton

Hanley Sustainability Institute, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, Ohio 45469, United States

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture · Basic Energy Sciences · San Diego Supercomputer Center

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c0321010.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c03210 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0294610.1021/acsanm.3c02946 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma201649f10.1021/ma201649f ↗
4. 10.1007/s10570-017-1319-510.1007/s10570-017-1319-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.13710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.137 ↗
6. 10.3390/pr806069810.3390/pr8060698 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.12315610.1016/j.carbpol.2024.123156 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1038210.1021/acsnano.4c10382 ↗
9. 10.1039/D2RA07952F10.1039/D2RA07952F ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaenm.5c0069910.1021/acsaenm.5c00699 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0089310.1021/acsnano.8b00893 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20190231310.1002/smll.201902313 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0468510.1021/acsnano.4c04685 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsabm.5c0102910.1021/acsabm.5c01029 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jct.2023.10700710.1016/j.jct.2023.107007 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10904-020-01500-110.1007/s10904-020-01500-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.12331710.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123317 ↗
18. 10.1007/s41981-025-00355-210.1007/s41981-025-00355-2 ↗
19. 10.1080/02656736.2019.162831310.1080/02656736.2019.1628313 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-021-03813-x10.1007/s10570-021-03813-x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.physb.2021.41305410.1016/j.physb.2021.413054 ↗
22. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08110110.1103/PhysRevB.82.081101 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm800726v10.1021/bm800726v ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.09.02810.1016/j.carres.2005.09.028 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c0726110.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07261 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp205827y10.1021/jp205827y ↗
30. 10.1021/jp202489s10.1021/jp202489s ↗
31. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
32. 10.3390/nano1303045310.3390/nano13030453 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0654210.1021/acsnano.8b06542 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano902027510.3390/nano9020275 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1519667310.3390/ma15196673 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.018 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cis.2023.10297310.1016/j.cis.2023.102973 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.10008110.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100081 ↗
39. 10.1186/s42834-022-00136-910.1186/s42834-022-00136-9 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.10510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.105 ↗
41. 10.1021/ma102731m10.1021/ma102731m ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.279 ↗
43. 10.30492/ijcce.2023.563026.562410.30492/ijcce.2023.563026.5624 ↗
44. Markhulia J. · Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. · 2018 · 13 · 1081
45. 10.1007/s00396-020-04640-510.1007/s00396-020-04640-5 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10570-019-02944-610.1007/s10570-019-02944-6 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.02010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.020 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0292810.1021/acsomega.0c02928 ↗
49. 10.1116/1.124793810.1116/1.1247938 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.01110.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.011 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ssc.2023.11508810.1016/j.ssc.2023.115088 ↗
52. 10.3762/bjnano.16.510.3762/bjnano.16.5 ↗
53. 10.1002/cctc.20250076510.1002/cctc.202500765 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.08600210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.086002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
56. 10.1021/j100135a01410.1021/j100135a014 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10909-014-1242-110.1007/s10909-014-1242-1 ↗
58. 10.1021/sc400540f10.1021/sc400540f ↗
59. 10.3390/nano1107178710.3390/nano11071787 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10948-014-2561-910.1007/s10948-014-2561-9 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.10552110.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105521 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.493548410.1063/1.4935484 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41598-018-29501-810.1038/s41598-018-29501-8 ↗
64. 10.1039/D4RA01600A10.1039/D4RA01600A ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.085 ↗
66. 10.1063/5.024520010.1063/5.0245200 ↗
67. 10.1002/smll.20250766510.1002/smll.202507665 ↗
68. 10.1039/D1TC02105B10.1039/D1TC02105B ↗
69. 10.3390/ijms2617858610.3390/ijms26178586 ↗